Posted on 10/15/2004 5:28:10 PM PDT by freedom44
http://www.iranian.com/Poll/
The Washington Times reports: "The Kerry-Edwards campaign is headed toward a campaign finance scandal involving contributions on behalf of a foreign power, similar to allegations that plagued Bill Clinton's re-election in 1996. Instead of Communist China, this time the foreign power seeking to influence a U.S. presidential candidate is the Islamic Republic of Iran, the world's premier state sponsor of international terror." Do you believe there's a link between Iran and Kerry? Or is this pre-election propaganda?
-- Yes, there is a link 35.48 % (33)
-- No, it is pre-election propaganda 56.99 % (53)
-- Not sure 7.53 % (7)
Above results from when first posted
How 'bout a link between Kerry and Rathergate....or Clinton and Memogate.....
As good as a link between Saddam and Terrorism!
"yes" is ahead now but freep harder.
-- Yes, there is a link 50.40 % (63)
-- No, it is pre-election propaganda 43.20 % (54)
-- Not sure 6.40 % (8)
Total Votes: 125
Well we turned that around in hurry.....
Yes=52%
No=40%
I just voted and now it is:
- Yes, there is a link 56.86 % (87)
-- No, it is pre-election propaganda 36.60 % (56)
-- Not sure 6.54 % (10)
I know the Iranians are sleezy, but do you really think they would associate with Kerry?
Well i wouldn't say Iranian people are sleezy, but the Government yes and i believe they certainly would.
Wouldn't you if he promised to give you enriched Nuclear Materials???
Moderater didn't like the way the polls were going so he pulled the poll. Check it out.
Updates
help
Due to obvious cheating in altering the results of recent iranian.com polls, I will no longer use iranian.com's own polling software. If you know of a secure and reliable polling service please let me know.
How about the DNC being on the oil voucher list??
John
Due to Obvious Cheating?
He has a mail link on the words "Let Me Know"
mailto:times@iranian.com
So I emailed him and accused him of cowardice
for pulling the poll just because he didn't like
the results.
Did the same. I hope everyone emails him
Here is his reply to me, followed by my subsequent reply to him... I was trying to be polite...
On Friday 15 October 2004 05:33 pm, you wrote:
> >What are you talking about...?
> >The result goses against your belief so automatically its cheating?
> >
> >When a pole comes to the attention of a lot of people you get a
> >better reading on the views of the community as a whole. Dropping
> >your poll just because you don't like the result is cowardly.
> No sir... the results reversed in a matter of 10 minutes.
> I know who it is.
Results reversed because many people were alerted to the existence
of the poll. With the sample size I saw (about 114 when I saw it)
this is not unusual. Give it time. When 6 or 700 results are in then
it will be more stable.
It is intellectually dishonest to cut and run just because the results
differ with your pre-conceived notions. The Poll was about what
people BELIEVE. Preventing the expression of belief does not
change the belief - let alone the truth.
You need courage.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.