Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

HAVE YOU NO SHAME, SENATORS?
OPINION EDITORIALS.COM ^ | OCTOBER 18, 2004 | JUDSON COX

Posted on 10/18/2004 12:23:05 PM PDT by CHARLITE

Have You No Shame Senators? Judson Cox

In January, I wrote a column entitled “The John Edwards North Carolina Knows.” I accused Sen. Edwards of being a side show huckster, a snake oil salesman, a man willing to exploit any situation and use any person to advance his career. I based my evaluation of Edwards, not only on his public statements, but on my personal experience with him. I knew his faults, because I know the man. Many people responded, angrily defending Edwards. This week, Edwards proved my point.

Edwards said, at a rally in Newton, Iowa, “... when John Kerry is president, people like Christopher Reeve are going to walk, get up out of that wheelchair and walk again.''

Edwards took the occasion of Christopher Reeve’s death to play the stunts he used as a trial lawyer, saying that if he and Kerry are elected, the lame will walk. Charles Krauthammer labeled this the worst example of demagoguery he has witnessed in 25 years of DC politics. Were Krauthammer to study Edwards more closely, he would have to revise his statement frequently – this incident barely scratches the surface of the depths of Edwards' ruthless opportunism.

Sen. Kerry also sought to take advantage of Reeve’s tragedy. According to Tribune National Correspondent, Jill Zuckman, Kerry claimed Reeve called him on the night of the second debate, and left a message thanking him for supporting stem cell research. “The excitement in his voice was really just palpable. He was just thrilled at where the discussion of stem cell research had come to." Reeve had already fallen in to a coma at the time Kerry claims he called. Kerry’s willingness to exploit people and situations knows no bounds.

In the third debate, Kerry gratuitously exploited Vice President Cheney’s daughter, “We're all God's children, Bob. And I think if you were to talk to Dick Cheney's daughter, who is a lesbian, she would tell you that she's being who she was, she's being who she was born as.” The question was whether or not the candidates believe people are born gay. There was no reason for Kerry to mention the Cheney daughter. His goal was to use her lesbianism as a political weapon against the President. Kerry’ campaign manager, Mary Beth Cahill, said Cheney’s sexuality was, “fair game.” As Lynne Cheney responded, this was “a cheap and tawdry political trick.”

In the debates, Kerry prefaced nearly every statement on moral issues by reminding us that he was raised a Catholic and was once an altar boy. This, even though he denies the Church’s authority, and condemns bishops for pointing out that his politics are in opposition to Catholic teaching. Kerry said, “My faith affects everything that I do, in truth. There's a great passage of the Bible that says, "What does it mean, my brother, to say you have faith if there are no deeds? Faith without works is dead." What are these works? He claims his faith leads him to fight poverty and work for a better environment, but his faith has no bearing on issues such as abortion or gay marriage. Even though he claims to believe that life begins at conception, Kerry’s faith does not lead him to condemn what, by his own reasoning, is taking an innocent human life.

Kerry pledges not to impose his faith on others by condemning policies morally opposed to Biblical principles. In other words, he will take any politically expedient position. Were Kerry around during American slavery, I imagine his position would be something along the lines of, “I believe slavery is morally wrong, but I will not impose my religious beliefs on slave holders.” Were he alive during the Holocaust, he may have said, “I am against killing Jews, but I will not impose my religious beliefs on the Nazis.” Clearly this dichotomy is unacceptable. It is merely an exploitation of an issue meant to take advantage of both sides.

Kerry and Edwards are from opposing sides of the Mason – Dixon Line, but they are cut from the same cloth. They are opportunists, willing to exploit any issue for political gain. In the words of Lynne Cheney, “The only thing I can conclude is he (Sen. Kerry) is not a good man” – neither is Sen. Edwards.

JUDSON COX Judson Cox is a political columnist from the mountains of North Carolina. He is quickly gaining recognition as one of the most popular and influential voices of his generation. As a college student, President of the Foundation for Conservative American Values and Editor In Chief of the North Carolina Conservative (North Carolina’s largest circulation newspaper) he has a unique perspective on matters of politics, economics and culture.

Comment: conservativejud@yahoo.com


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; Philosophy; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: campaign; christopherreeve; cures; cynical; exploitation; hitler; jews; johnedwards; johnkerry; lesbian; marybethcahill; marycheney; nazis; ncarolina; politicalweapon; research; senate; senators; shame; snakeoil; stemcell; wheelchair

1 posted on 10/18/2004 12:23:16 PM PDT by CHARLITE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: CHARLITE
"Reeve had already fallen in to a coma at the time Kerry claims he called."

Is anyone surprised?


Stay Strong,
Fuzzy122

2 posted on 10/18/2004 12:28:49 PM PDT by fuzzy122 (GBGB [God Bless George Bush] and the Armed Forces ... Arnold and Zell too!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CHARLITE

CHarlite,

Thanks for posting. If you do some search, you will see that I made the *exact* same points about Kerry's spiritual convenience the day after the last debate.

Seems that being catholic is only important when saving the poor and downtrodden, not when saving the unborn.


3 posted on 10/18/2004 12:29:08 PM PDT by Paloma_55
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paloma_55

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1246484/posts?page=7#7


4 posted on 10/18/2004 12:34:03 PM PDT by Paloma_55
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: CHARLITE

The most vile form of living tissue on this planet is a lawyer-politician.


5 posted on 10/18/2004 12:35:02 PM PDT by ampat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CHARLITE
Edwards took the occasion of Christopher Reeve’s death to play the stunts he used as a trial lawyer, saying that if he and Kerry are elected, the lame will walk

I had NO idea Christ was on the ballot.

These "people" make me sick.

6 posted on 10/18/2004 12:44:21 PM PDT by Puppage (You may disagree with what I have to say, but I shall defend to your death my right to say it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fuzzy122

Second debate on Friday October 8. Heart attack followed by coma on Saturday. Death on Sunday.

Still a slimy thing for him to mention. The whole family was grieving, not needing to hear about the death again....


7 posted on 10/18/2004 12:44:29 PM PDT by AdamsPapers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: AdamsPapers

Hal Lindsey
"By Whatever Means Necessary"
World Net Daily Oct. 14, 2004

"Nothing appears to be above exploitation. John Kerry even dedicated a speech he delivered on Monday to the late actor Christopher Reeve. Kerry said he knew the "Superman" actor for about 15 years through family and dedication to the same causes, and said Reeve left him a long voice-mail on Saturday thanking him for campaigning on the possibilities of a cure for conditions like his.

It had been originally reported that Reeve died on Sunday after slipping into a coma on Thursday following complications from treatment for a bed sore. After John Kerry's speech, reports of Reeve's death were changed to remove the reference to Thursday in order to make it possible for Reeve to call John Kerry and leave a long message for him on his answering machine on Saturday night. Evidently, Kerry didn't know about the "coma" part until after the speech, but his well-oiled damage-control team was already on it."


The first reports I heard confirm Linsey's account, so I'm sticking with it.


8 posted on 10/18/2004 12:55:59 PM PDT by conservativejud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: fuzzy122

This is another example of Kerry displaying his "essential decency" (referred to today by William Safire). Sorry Bill, this is a quality that Horseface has never had. He is a self consumed opportunist, a liar, and a boor.


9 posted on 10/18/2004 12:56:51 PM PDT by Big Digger (If you can keep your head when others are losing theirs, you must be a Republican)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Big Digger

He is a self consumed opportunist, a liar, and a boor.


And gigolo.

Don't forget the gigoloism.


10 posted on 10/18/2004 2:52:03 PM PDT by Ole Okie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: CHARLITE
What contemptible bullsh*t.
11 posted on 10/18/2004 3:34:15 PM PDT by four more in O 4 (God Bless George Bush and God Bless YOU.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CHARLITE
"There was no reason for Kerry to mention the Cheney daughter."

And there was no reason for the stoopid moderator to ask the question except to give Kerry an opening to make the stoopid remark. A set-up if I ever saw one.

12 posted on 10/18/2004 4:33:08 PM PDT by Eastbound ("Neither a Scrooge nor a Patsy be.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson