Skip to comments.
Who is going to die?
World Net Daily ^
| December 1, 2004
| Joseph Farah
Posted on 12/01/2004 1:04:29 AM PST by eakole
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 141-146 next last
1
posted on
12/01/2004 1:04:29 AM PST
by
eakole
To: eakole
Who is going to die? Everybody, eventually.
2
posted on
12/01/2004 1:06:47 AM PST
by
asgardshill
(November 2004 - The Month That Just Kept On Giving)
To: SLB; Jeff Head; Travis McGee; Grampa Dave
3
posted on
12/01/2004 1:09:37 AM PST
by
Squantos
(Be polite. Be professional. But, have a plan to kill everyone you meet. ©)
To: eakole
"The Islamist world and its allies need to know there will be an unprecedented nuclear response to any attack on the United States with weapons of mass destruction. We don't need to be specific about which major cities and installations will be vaporized. ""hhhmmmm....
If the US says that Syria or Iran will be nuked then it provides incentive for small-time enemies of Syria or Iran to launch a WMD attack against the US (anthrax, sarin, ricin or radiological bomb, all fairly available to smaller countries...) and then provide clear evidenc it was Syria or Iran.
Otherwise how does the US know for sure the origins of a WMD attack. There is no missile trail.
4
posted on
12/01/2004 1:10:27 AM PST
by
Mark Felton
(We are free because we are Christian. There is no other reason.)
To: eakole
Terrorism is a cancer that can only be cured with a massive dose of radiation.
To: eakole
Guilty of aiding and abetting:
Saudi Arabia
Iran
Pakistan
Syria
Palestine
North Korea
Without the moral and material support of those nations, the terrorists would not get WMD.
6
posted on
12/01/2004 1:14:56 AM PST
by
Bon mots
To: Squantos
What's this guy trying to say, Squantos? It's a bit of a mystery. Thanks in advance. :)
7
posted on
12/01/2004 1:16:14 AM PST
by
bd476
To: Bon mots
Unfortunately Russia is a major supplier too.
Just look at Iran...
8
posted on
12/01/2004 1:16:34 AM PST
by
DB
(©)
To: eakole
I vote for the Samson Option.
9
posted on
12/01/2004 1:16:59 AM PST
by
shibumi
(John Galt is alive and well. He tends bar in a casino restaurant.)
To: BulletBobCo
I much prefer FAE's to nukes, no radioactivity to worry about afterwards. You can go right in after the firestorms have abated. We already used them in DS and OEF, we will just have to use a few more at a time.
10
posted on
12/01/2004 1:18:11 AM PST
by
stm
To: onyx
Here's a fun topic. / tongue in cheek
11
posted on
12/01/2004 1:19:00 AM PST
by
bd476
To: bd476
I think he's wishing more than speaking......I like the way he wishes . Short version IMO he's selling the threat as it should be ....to other countries. Not ours.
Stay safe !
12
posted on
12/01/2004 1:20:36 AM PST
by
Squantos
(Be polite. Be professional. But, have a plan to kill everyone you meet. ©)
To: eakole
Excellent. The engineering solution to this problem begins to creep in around the edges of the mainstream. Yes, we need to have this discussion. |
13
posted on
12/01/2004 1:20:49 AM PST
by
Nick Danger
(Want some wood?)
To: eakole
The MSM could only dream of such a scenario: Bush fails to protect the US, and them kills millions overseas in "cowboy-like" retaliation, blah, blah, blah. And the images would immediately shift from dead Americans to dead people overseas, "Bush started WWIII" protests in Europe, blah, blah, blah.
14
posted on
12/01/2004 1:23:12 AM PST
by
DTogo
(U.S. out of the U.N. & U.N out of the U.S.)
To: DTogo
15
posted on
12/01/2004 1:27:31 AM PST
by
DB
(©)
To: Mark Felton
You are applying rationality to a Joseph Farah screed. Cut that out!
16
posted on
12/01/2004 1:28:44 AM PST
by
AntiGuv
(™)
To: eakole
Prime Target
17
posted on
12/01/2004 1:29:39 AM PST
by
Kozak
(Anti Shahada: " There is no God named Allah, and Muhammed is his False Prophet")
To: Squantos
Thank you, Squantos. I was interpreting it in a completely different way. Now that I've read the entire article, all I can say is that I hope this is already planned out.
We certainly have the addresses of the monsters who are giving approval to the terrorists. I hope we do.
This needs to be beyond the planning stages by now. Discussion yes. Resolve yes. Ready time, yesterday.
18
posted on
12/01/2004 1:30:40 AM PST
by
bd476
To: Nick Danger
One problem to consider is the event that we elect a muslim, internationalist, milquetoast or "Benedict Arnold" President.
19
posted on
12/01/2004 1:36:11 AM PST
by
eakole
To: bd476
You pinged me to THIS as a fun topic/tongue in cheek?
Am I still sane or is my head hurting too much? LOL!
I want you to know, I read the whole article.
For once, I agree with JF.
We do need to tell the Islamic world that we'll nuke all of them
if we're attacked with WMD's.
20
posted on
12/01/2004 1:40:53 AM PST
by
onyx
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 141-146 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson