Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Top Aide: Don't Expect Hillary to Serve Full Second Term
NewsMax.com ^ | 12/04/04 | Carl Limbacher

Posted on 12/04/2004 11:58:36 AM PST by kattracks

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-100 next last
To: christie
More good stuff :

_________________________________________________

AIM Report: Hillary Clinton's Biggest Cover-Ups
August 11, 2003

Living History does attempt to explain her move from the political right to the left. But it stops far short of explaining her involvement with extreme left-wing groups.
Send this page to a friend
Format this page for printing


Of all the Hillary Clinton scandals and cover-ups, none is more significant than her attempt to whitewash her own personal transformation from Goldwater girl to Marxist. No mainstream media organization has examined how she is determined in her new book to keep people in the dark about what Hillary biographer, the late Barbara Olson, described as her "roots in Marxism."

"In her formative years," explained Olson, "Marxism was a very important part of her ideology..."

Olson's important 1999 book, Hell to Pay: The Unfolding Story of Hillary Rodham Clinton (Regnery Publishing, Inc., 1999), remains the best account of Hillary's communist connections and emergence as a "budding Leninist" who "understood the Leninist concept of acquiring, accumulating and maintaining political power at any cost."

As an example, Hillary's book gripes that the end to her illegal closed-door health-care task-force meetings, where a socialized medicine scheme was hatched, was the result of her opponents citing an "obscure federal law" in court. Hillary, a lawyer, never wanted the law to get in her way.

Excerpted ........see

61 posted on 12/04/2004 1:44:19 PM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach (A Proud member of Free Republic ~~The New Face of the Fourth Estate since 1996.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Whataday

"new yorkers are crazy"...there is a novel idea...some would say that too many of them are certifiable[yes,the rat colonies]....i thought it was a given that most of them felt confident that they lived in the centre of the universe and that the universe revolved around them, as and when requested,of course and ,i almost forgot,..that's why hillary and bubba are carpetbagging in that fair state...bcboy


62 posted on 12/04/2004 1:44:24 PM PST by bc boy (bc boy again)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: kattracks

Nah, she'll never serve a complete 2nd term. Hope the New Yorkers bounce her out on her a**--I know, wishful thinking!


63 posted on 12/04/2004 1:48:42 PM PST by lilylangtree (Veni, Vidi, Vici)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach; All
--Early life, education, and career-
64 posted on 12/04/2004 1:49:34 PM PST by backhoe (-30-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: TWohlford

Not to mention a Hillary run will be one of the most entertaining political races in US history. I personally can't wait. A solid year or two of Clinton laugh a minute.


65 posted on 12/04/2004 1:50:49 PM PST by tjg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: backhoe; Bullish; christie; seenenuf; kattracks

This is turning into a good educational thread......


66 posted on 12/04/2004 1:53:16 PM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach (A Proud member of Free Republic ~~The New Face of the Fourth Estate since 1996.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Internet polls are always skewed to the right. People who frequent the Internet are by and large more educated and intelligent than the public at large.
67 posted on 12/04/2004 1:54:12 PM PST by Bullish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Hillary - Voted #5 in a 'Most Evil People in the 20th Century' poll

Right up there with Hitler, Stalin, Pol Pot and Bill Clinton

68 posted on 12/04/2004 2:01:21 PM PST by Slyfox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Slyfox

I wonder if Webb Hubble needs another half-a-million bucks.


69 posted on 12/04/2004 2:06:12 PM PST by agere_contra
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Txsleuth
Does anyone know anything about Evan Bayh?

He's very popular in his home state of Indiana. The Bayh name is a dynasty there. He's the son of Birch Bayh who was also a Senator for Indiana. Evan was a two term governor who did not raise taxes (maybe the only one in the nation for those eight years). His ACU rating as a Senator is around 20 which isn't moderate, except for a Dem. He appears moderate and has a good looking family and is generally regarded as Mr. Clean. No Clinton like baggage here.

He's probably the best guy they can nominate. He was snubbed for the veep pick in 2000 because he votes against partial birth abortion.

70 posted on 12/04/2004 2:06:18 PM PST by NeoCaveman (http://route-82.blogspot.com (Now with 20% more stuned beebers))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: dubyaismypresident

Sounds like a formidable foe, eh?


71 posted on 12/04/2004 2:09:44 PM PST by Txsleuth (Proud to be a Texan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: TWohlford
The only thing we have to fear is if she gets elected due to the utter bumbling of "our side."

Or our side not having a strong viable candidate.

72 posted on 12/04/2004 2:11:34 PM PST by Aeronaut (May all the feckless become fecked.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: kattracks

i don't expect her to serve a first.


73 posted on 12/04/2004 2:13:11 PM PST by the invisib1e hand (if a man lives long enough, he gets to see the same thing over and over.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Txsleuth
Sounds like a formidable foe, eh?

My nightmare is Bayh vs. Guiliani. Bayh would attack him from the right, and it would probably work.

74 posted on 12/04/2004 2:13:42 PM PST by NeoCaveman (http://route-82.blogspot.com (Now with 20% more stuned beebers))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: DoctorMichael
Senator Kerry did NOT do this this in 2004.

Nor did Seantor LIEberman.

75 posted on 12/04/2004 2:16:11 PM PST by Aeronaut (May all the feckless become fecked.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: christie

And the funny thing about this"taking away what you have for the common good"quote is that it was made at a big fund raising affair for her rich Democrat donors,a group that may think they"deserve"to have some of that wealth taken away.
Which is Ok with me if they so CHOOSE to donate any of their excess profits to the national treasury!
The key word being CHOOSE!


76 posted on 12/04/2004 2:20:46 PM PST by Riverman94610
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
This is great. The Dims have already lost to George W. Bush twice in a row. Now they're planning to run against him again, even though he won't be on the ballot.

They're already making huge strategic mistakes, and it isn't even 2006, much less 2008.

77 posted on 12/04/2004 2:24:39 PM PST by savedbygrace ("No Monday morning quarterback has never led a team to victory" GW Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
I don't think she'll run in 2006. She won't risk the loss and she can spend all her time running for President. She will have several YEARS to run AND no more votes in the senate that could be used against her.

She is VERY CUNNING and is spending all her time raising money and re-inventing herself...remember, short memories and the MSM on her side....we need to do the same as her...spend our time educating people about her.

78 posted on 12/04/2004 2:29:41 PM PST by cfrels
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: An Old Marine
Hillary will run for the Senate in '06 and New Yorkers will return her. As a New Yorker I can't explain it but thats the way it'll be.

Do you really think that Rudy doesn't have what it takes to unseat her? Especially if Al Sharpton gives her a bruising fight for the nomination? My theory is that he ran for President in order to call Tawana Brawley, et al. "old news". Hillary would have to bring it up, or at least allude to it to get the nomination, and Al's urban supporters would feel bitter about it after Hill gets the nod, then would take it out on her by voting for Rudy.

Sound plausible, or am I hallucinating here?

79 posted on 12/04/2004 2:38:47 PM PST by hunter112 (Total victory, both in the USA and the Middle East!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Txsleuth

He'd never get out of the primaries..


80 posted on 12/04/2004 2:40:49 PM PST by ken5050
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-100 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson