Posted on 01/08/2005 12:13:31 PM PST by kattracks
Which is exactly how the MSM would have portrayed it.
The decision to keep the politically awkward indictment under wraps allowed Mr. and Mrs. Clinton to assume high profile roles attacking President Bush on the Iraq war, as well as a whole range of domestic issues, without having to answer questions about their role in Rosen's case.
As if anyone, especiially the MSM would have asked these questions,
While I guess I don't really care - What ever happened to simply disclosing the indictment when it comes down, in the normal course. ANY interference by anyone in the process is wrong, whether it is to rush it or delay it for political or other advantage.
IMO that is.
Hopefully, Sandy Burglar will be next............
Aw ... how kind, how clever!
What a blessing it is to have the Liberal Press to blame for such moves.
Reminds me of the time the GOP Senators "split their consciences" and passed the Schumer Amendment 87-13 lest Gore get any good press coverage for breaking what they would have has us believe was gonna be a "tie".
Don't know that I'll stick around to read the comments on this thread. I'm not one who enjoys listening to the abused defend their abusers ... particularly where concerns the enabling of objective "Evil" sorts like the Clintons.
What a pathetic joke.
later read
Hmmmm. Methinks his nickname is Bravo Sierra.
Dang if you do and dang if you don't!!
How many people think the DemocRATS would have acted similarly, if the situation had been reversed?
Hmmmm. Methinks his nickname is Bravo Sierra.
Unlike the DemonRats, who engaged in a full-court press to taint Bush's election. The got Hollywood to make bogus documentaries, they spun all news events to appear as negative as possible, they engaged in document forgeries, the list goes on and on.... It sure says a lot about both campaigns and their supporters, doesn't it?
At this time???
Kind of makes a person go Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
BRING ON THE POPCORN!
I'm sure that the Democrats would have handled this with the same discretion. (/sarcasm)
=== former finance chairman David Rosen was actually indicted in 2003, the Bush administration kept it secret till the indictment was unsealed late Friday
Perhaps this is just timed so that the Moral Party's loosening of its own standards in order to wipe the slate clean for Delay won't appear quite so hypocritical.
Me, too. His treachery was caught on tape..
You got in first, you sneaky thing... ;-)
Its Hollywood....I want milk-duds
=== It sure says a lot about both campaigns and their supporters, doesn't it?
Yes it does but I'm not sure you're getting the message yet if you're still pleased as punch to be a member of the "Stoopid Party"
As opposed to some people who would rather ALWAYS blame the Republicans or President Bush.
Don't know that I'll stick around to read the comments on this thread.
Believe me, you won't be missed.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.