Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

So if the Labour Party over there doesn't win, will we continue to see support in the War on Terror from its most visible leader?

In Canada, there was once a similar situation. Lester B. Pearson (the Liberal) defeated John Diefenbaker. Pearson was the more pro-American of the two. Diefenbaker's background included membership in a very anti-American group within the British Conservative Party.

Political parties in some foreign countries are interesting, to say the least, but we should learn about them in the context of history with respect to the USA.

1 posted on 02/24/2005 10:43:03 AM PST by familyop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: familyop

Who cares? The Brits are all girly-men.


2 posted on 02/24/2005 10:44:44 AM PST by TommyDale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: familyop

Why worry over another countries politics. You can't do anything to change the people, so let them elect a leader. If they don't like America, big deal, tell them to get in the back of the line. Our President will do what is best for his people. Europe should do the same.


4 posted on 02/24/2005 10:49:15 AM PST by JeffersonRepublic.com (The 51st state is right around the corner.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: familyop

"So if the Labour Party over there doesn't win, will we continue to see support in the War on Terror from its most visible leader?"

The USA would get more support from the Tories than from the Labour Party (particularly without Blair - who will likely be gotten rid of by the left within his party at the earliest opportunity)


5 posted on 02/24/2005 10:51:57 AM PST by oursouls
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: familyop

"So if the Labour Party over there doesn't win, will we continue to see support in the War on Terror from its most visible leader?"

The USA would get more support from the Tories than from the Labour Party (particularly without Blair - who will likely be gotten rid of by the left wing of his party at the earliest opportunity)


6 posted on 02/24/2005 10:52:34 AM PST by oursouls
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: familyop
Not sure if this is good news or bad, actually. I've come to respect Blair, even if he's a total wishy-washy pansy on social and moral issues.

I wonder if the Slightly Silly Party will be running any candidates this time 'round?
12 posted on 02/24/2005 10:59:15 AM PST by Antoninus (In hoc signo, vinces †)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: familyop

The Liberal Democrat party getting 18% is most unsettling part of this poll.

If these numbers are right, it mean Labour and the Libs will have a coaliton government. The British are going to have some pretty far left policies being introduced.


19 posted on 02/24/2005 11:09:50 AM PST by nypokerface
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: familyop; MadIvan

Other polls have suggested the Conservatives were heading toward third-party status... what happened?


21 posted on 02/24/2005 11:12:18 AM PST by GeronL (Bush on the PRESS "They just float sewer out there.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: familyop
Prayers for our FRiends in Britain, may the results best serve our allies and the cause of freedom.
25 posted on 02/24/2005 11:16:23 AM PST by Caipirabob (Democrats.. Socialists..Commies..Traitors...Who can tell the difference?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson