Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Just What the Doctor Ordered? (Glenn Reynolds on the need for hospitals to change)
Tech Central Station ^ | 3/2/05 | Glenn Harlan Reynolds

Posted on 03/02/2005 6:07:41 AM PST by jalisco555

In last week's column, I mentioned that I now have a bionic wife, courtesy of an implantable cardioverter/defibrillator device. She's now recovering nicely, but the experience has left me with a few thoughts on health-care delivery.

The technology seems pretty good. My wife's ICD is a technological marvel, and these devices are improving rapidly, something that seems likely to continue as Medicare's recent expansion of coverage for ICDs pumps more money into the system, supporting further research and development. The imaging technology that they used to implant the device, and assess the results later is pretty impressive. So is the wireless monitoring technology they use on the cardiac floor.

The people were also very nice. They were universally efficient, caring, and pleasant. (One nurse cheered my wife up by pointing to her (rather protuberant) belly and announcing that she had had a heart attack several years earlier but was now pregnant at the age of 46. Her bustling energy and good cheer were ample evidence that there's life after heart trouble.) As always, the physicians seemed more remote from most of the goings-on, but they seemed quite careful and competent.

It's other places where they fall down. Being in the hospital is an exhausting, draining experience even if you aren't sick. I spent a lot of time, and a couple of nights, there, and I felt like I had been run over by a truck. Imagine how I'd have felt if I had been, you know, a patient with something actually wrong with me.

Sleep interruptions are one problem. The floor below my wife's housed the sleep-disorder clinic, where they monitor people and try to help them overcome various problems, like sleep apnea, so that they can achieve an uninterrupted night's sleep. Ironically, it's probably the only place in the hospital where they let you sleep all night long if you want. My wife was interrupted, on average, about every 90 minutes or so all night long: To have blood drawn, to have vital signs checked, to have her temperature taken, to be given medications ("wake up, it's time for your sleeping pill" isn't just a hospital joke) and, most irritatingly, to be weighed.

Now, there are good reasons for a lot of this stuff. Medications have to be given at certain times, temperatures have to be monitored, and so on. Even the weight is important, especially for cardiac patients where fluid balance often matters a lot. (Though not in my wife's case, as her problems were different.)

But the end result of all of this stuff, especially when it's spread over the evening, is a huge amount of stress on somebody who's already under stress from illness. I don't think that anyone has done the experiment (as has in fact been done with regard to mental hospitals) of hospitalizing some healthy grad students for a couple of weeks and then measuring their condition on discharge, but I'm pretty sure I know what the result would be: Most of them would come out in far worse shape than they were when they entered, even if they managed to avoid other hospital hazards like nosocomial infections or malnutrition from lousy hospital food. And I rather doubt that anyone familiar with hospitals and hospitalization would disagree. That suggests to me that somebody ought to be thinking harder about ways of making the hospital environment more patient-friendly. It's impossible to make a hospital as stress-free as, say, a spa or a hotel, but it seems to me that with a bit of planning and organization it would be possible to do a lot better than we're doing now. (And several of the nurses with whom I discussed this problem agreed.) Like the traditional hospital gowns, an awful lot of things seem to be "flimsy, drab, and designed for the practitioner's convenience rather than for the patient's comfort." It's time for that to change.

Speaking of hotels and comfort, it might be a good idea for hospitals to pay more attention to visitors' needs, too. No matter how good the nursing staff is, they're understaffed almost everywhere. That means that hospitals rely, to greater or lesser degrees, on patients' families and friends for everything from minor services like refilling water glasses to fairly major things like monitoring treatments and medications to make sure there aren't errors. I always pay close attention to that sort of thing on behalf of my family members who are hospitalized, and have caught a couple of mistakes that might have led to serious problems.

You'd think that would be cheap malpractice insurance, and hospitals seem to notice in the abstract -- I saw posters telling people that if they couldn't have family or friends around they should hire someone to sit with them -- but not much is done to make the lot of long-term visitors easy; even the chair in my wife's room was excruciatingly uncomfortable. ("I'd rather be a patient than a visitor," one nurse told me). While there are some efforts along these lines, there's not enough.

I'd have liked a comfy chair, and high-speed Internet. (The latter would benefit patients, too -- my computer has a go-anywhere cellular card from Verizon, which the hospital told me was safe to use in the rooms, and my wife got considerable pleasure and relief from being able to check her email, keep her web-related stuff updated, etc. I think a lot of patients would benefit similarly, as hospitals aren't just uncomfortable, but crushingly dull. Yeah, I know: Comfy chairs and wireless Internet are my answers to a lot of problems. But hey, they're good answers!) But though Internet access would have been nice, I'd have settled for a comfy chair.

Call me crazy, but I suspect that if hospitals -- and health care generally -- ran more along market lines, there would be a lot more emphasis on making patients and visitors happy, and on organizing things more efficiently. As Andy Stedman notes, in writing about emergency rooms:

"Restaurants and tire stores, like emergency rooms, never really know how much business to expect. However, it is unusual to have to wait hours for a meal or new tires, whereas in emergency rooms it seems to be the norm to wait hours for treatment. They're not full, either, they're just woefully understaffed."

I wonder if this perspective will get much attention during discussions of health-care "reform?" Not unless those of us who think that way make some noise.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Editorial; Government; News/Current Events; Philosophy; US: Tennessee
KEYWORDS: healthcare; hospitals; instapundit; insurance
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last
As someone who has spent a lot of time in hospitals I agree with a lot of what the professor is saying.
1 posted on 03/02/2005 6:07:41 AM PST by jalisco555
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: jalisco555
Call me crazy, but I suspect that if hospitals ... ran more along market lines, there would be a lot more emphasis on making patients and visitors happy, and on organizing things more efficiently.

For that to happen, people would have to be spending their own money rather than someone else's (or, at least, making more of their own decisions).

That seems to be the problem with most of whatever is wrong with our current healthcare system.

2 posted on 03/02/2005 6:15:10 AM PST by newgeezer (Just my opinion, of course. Your mileage may vary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jalisco555
"They do a wonderful job, but I was so uncomfortable!"

Wow. Hospitals should be day-spas, resorts, and spiritual retreats...

3 posted on 03/02/2005 6:15:31 AM PST by Mamzelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jalisco555

I am totally on board with this. The last place I would want to be is the hospital if I were seriously ill. From the lack of total darkness to sleep in, to the lack of being left alone long enough to get some sleep, to the lack of quiet enough to be able to sleep, to the unhealthy high fat low fiber meals, it's enough to kill a sick person. If I need surgery or to have a baby, fine, they've saved my life once and saved my baby's life, but after the procedure I want out of ther ASAP, thank you very much.


4 posted on 03/02/2005 6:18:05 AM PST by yldstrk (My heros have always been cowboys-Reagan and Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jalisco555
However, it is unusual to have to wait hours for a meal or new tires, whereas in emergency rooms it seems to be the norm to wait hours for treatment. They're not full, either, they're just woefully understaffed."

As someone who works in a hospital, he is correct on some points. However, he feels that hospitals should be more orientated towards making everyone feel good emotionally instead of physically - that is not their job. Emergency Rooms are for just that EMERGENCIES. Many people enter the ER with simple cuts, sore throats, headaches, stubbed toes, etc. These type of patients clog the system and only take time away from people who truly need medical attention.

5 posted on 03/02/2005 6:19:29 AM PST by Gerish (Choose God, he has already chosen you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jalisco555
Like the traditional hospital gowns

Is it too much trouble to bring a bathrobe with you to the hospital?

Your stay in a hospital is what you make of it. You make the decision. If you are expecting 4 star service, you are an idiot.

6 posted on 03/02/2005 6:25:27 AM PST by Glenn (The two keys to character: 1) Learn how to keep a secret. 2) ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: newgeezer
Heyyyyy, are you saying that the government funding of medicine has skewed the market fundamentals and handed the keys to the treasury to the medical/legal/insurance professions??

What are you, a capitalist or something?

Why, for that to be true, then the costs of medicine and medical procedures would have had to outstrip the rate of inflation!

Who would believe that? 8^)
7 posted on 03/02/2005 6:26:55 AM PST by bill1952 ("All that we do is done with an eye towards something else.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: newgeezer
For that to happen, people would have to be spending their own money rather than someone else's (or, at least, making more of their own decisions).

Agreed.

8 posted on 03/02/2005 6:28:08 AM PST by jalisco555 ("The best lack all conviction, while the worst are full of passionate intensity." W. B. Yeats)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Gerish
Many people enter the ER with simple cuts, sore throats, headaches, stubbed toes, etc

Many? You must work in a remote area. 8^)

It has been a while since the U of P in Phila, but I would have said "most." -good post.

9 posted on 03/02/2005 6:30:16 AM PST by bill1952 ("All that we do is done with an eye towards something else.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: bill1952
Many? You must work in a remote area. 8^)

This is primarily due to the way their health care is paid for. If people have a personal financial stake in the way their care is delivered these abuses would end.

10 posted on 03/02/2005 6:34:16 AM PST by jalisco555 ("The best lack all conviction, while the worst are full of passionate intensity." W. B. Yeats)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: jalisco555

Agreed.


11 posted on 03/02/2005 6:42:14 AM PST by bill1952 ("All that we do is done with an eye towards something else.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: jalisco555
They're not full, either, they're just woefully understaffed."

Well....that statement doesn't ring true with me....I've worked in plenty of ER's..that were generally staffed correctly..but had gurneys with people on them lined in the blooming hallways! In other words...we were not only FULL...we were overwhelmed..!!

12 posted on 03/02/2005 6:46:45 AM PST by Osage Orange (I'm a man, I can change, if I want to...Maybe.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Osage Orange; jalisco555
re: .I've worked in plenty of ER's..that were generally staffed correctly..but had gurneys with people on them lined in the blooming hallways)))

Well, according to the posters here, the time should have been spent giving those people in guernies---a "Rejuvenate and Restore Facial" (I'm reading from a flyer from a local day spa)... From the "a la carte" maybe a foot mud wrap and an express pedicure. Maybe a capuccino, sir? Please peruse our assortment of entertainments--the concierge would be pleased to please you!

We have free DSL lines, and a Yoga Master. Select from our designer bathrobes, which we will have monogrammed PRN. Later, the Monks from the local Frappist monastery will lead in Gregarian chants to help with your stress level.

13 posted on 03/02/2005 7:08:10 AM PST by Mamzelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Glenn

Well, you're paying enough for 4 star service, at 1500 dollars per night. Why not expect 4 star service?


14 posted on 03/02/2005 7:17:55 AM PST by TwoWolves (The only kind of control the liberals don't want is self control.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: jalisco555
...they're understaffed almost everywhere.

Let's see. People gripe about hgh medical costs. Two thirds of a hospital's costs are labor. And you want to increase staffing.
Am I the only one who figures that this doesn't compute?

15 posted on 03/02/2005 7:18:44 AM PST by curmudgeonII (Time wounds all heels.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bill1952

and for the most part they are on Medicaid or here in california MediCal. it's much easer to go to the er then their Doc's office.


16 posted on 03/02/2005 7:19:01 AM PST by markman46
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Mamzelle
LOL.....yeah, those were the good ol' days, eh?

Funny story.....

I've worked in a couple hospitals..that the oldster employees tell of the hospital many years in the past having dinner choice's of lobster and/or fillet mignon. With gourmet chefs...available 24/7. And where the local yokel's would actually come to Sunday bunch at the hospital cafeteria..!!

LOL!!!

17 posted on 03/02/2005 7:21:30 AM PST by Osage Orange (I'm a man, I can change, if I want to...Maybe.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: TwoWolves
You're paying to maintain a staggeringly expensive infrastructure. It is utterly trivial to compare a hospital to a hotel.

Ultrasounds, operating rooms, MRIs, equipment-equipment-equipment maintained by an army of unseen technicians.

18 posted on 03/02/2005 7:27:55 AM PST by Mamzelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: TwoWolves

Well, you're paying enough for 4 star service, at 1500 dollars per night. Why not expect 4 star service?

This has to be one of the least analytical thoughts I've seen in a long time.

19 posted on 03/02/2005 7:35:16 AM PST by Taliesan (The power of the State to do good is the power of the State to do evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: jalisco555
the Instawife who had the surgery:

20 posted on 03/02/2005 7:37:29 AM PST by finnman69 (cum puella incedit minore medio corpore sub quo manifestus globus, inflammare animos)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson