Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Senate Confirms a Judge
NY Times ^ | April 12, 2005 | THE ASSOCIATED PRESS

Posted on 04/12/2005 12:39:03 PM PDT by neverdem

WASHINGTON, April 11 (AP) - The Senate on Monday confirmed the first of President Bush's second-term judicial nominees as senators continued to argue over Democrats' blocking the White House's most prized candidates.

On a 95-to-0 vote, the Senate confirmed Paul Crotty as a federal district judge for New York State. With Mr. Crotty's confirmation, Mr. Bush has put 205 trial and appellate judges on the federal court since becoming president.

Democrats have blocked 10 of Mr. Bush's 52 appeals court nominations through filibuster threats, while allowing Republicans to confirm 34 others.

They have said they plan to keep blocking those 10 if they are brought up for confirmation again. In return, the Republicans have threatened to change the Senate rules to ban filibusters of judicial nominees.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; Government; News/Current Events; US: District of Columbia; US: New York
KEYWORDS: 109th; appealscourts; circuitcourts; courts; judges; judicialnominees; judiciary; paulcrotty; ussenate
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last
I was looking for the numbers of the Circuit(appeals) Court judges. Does anyone dispute the AP count?
1 posted on 04/12/2005 12:39:04 PM PDT by neverdem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Here come de Judge!.....


2 posted on 04/12/2005 12:41:55 PM PDT by Red Badger (Entrepreneurs find a need and fill it. Politicians create a need and fill it........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

They have said they plan to keep blocking those 10 if they are brought up for confirmation again.
=====
Yeah, the key anti-Marxist, patriotic, conservative judges who believe that the Constitution should be upheld, and that judges DO NOT legislate from the bench...


3 posted on 04/12/2005 12:45:34 PM PDT by EagleUSA (Q)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: EagleUSA

Why can't we take KKKBYRD at his word as the historian of the Senate? there is NO CONSTITUTIONAL REQUIREMENT for a SENATE VOTE!.......


4 posted on 04/12/2005 12:50:29 PM PDT by Red Badger (Entrepreneurs find a need and fill it. Politicians create a need and fill it........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

The first of the "contested" ones will come to the floor in the nesx week or so, that's when the fun starts. It's looking good.

http://exposingtheleft.blogspot.com/2005/04/50-for-nuclear-option.html


5 posted on 04/12/2005 12:52:01 PM PDT by traderrob6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: traderrob6

I'm still of the opinion that a nominee is AUTOMATICALLY a lock unless the Senate VOTES to SAY NO!.......


6 posted on 04/12/2005 12:55:00 PM PDT by Red Badger (Entrepreneurs find a need and fill it. Politicians create a need and fill it........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
Democrats have blocked 10 of Mr. Bush's 52 appeals court nominations through filibuster threats, while allowing Republicans to confirm 34 others...

"allowing" is an amusing choice of word. I'd like to see the Republicans grow a pair of balls and make these obstructionist 'rats TRULY FILIBUSTER...make them talk and talk and talk and talk and talk and talk and talk and talk and talk and talk and talk and talk and talk and talk and talk and talk and talk and talk and talk and talk and talk and talk and talk and talk and talk and talk and talk and talk and talk and talk and talk and talk and talk and talk.

And then I'd like to see the Republicans remind America that is was the Democrats who also filibustered civil rights legislation.

7 posted on 04/12/2005 12:55:08 PM PDT by Recovering_Democrat (I'm so glad to no longer be associated with the Party of Dependence on Government!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Any doubt as to why this one made it thru? This from 2004:

Senator Clinton Praises New York Judicial Nominee
November 16, 2004

Calling it an “absolute delight” to testify on his behalf before the Senate Judiciary Committee, Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton enthusiastically endorsed the nomination of Buffalo Native Paul Crotty to a seat on the federal bench. The Committee, today, considered Crotty’s nomination to the bench in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York.

"Paul has distinguished himself in both the public and private sectors,” Senator Clinton said. She cited his private sector work as a practicing attorney and as Group President for New York and Connecticut for Verizon Communications. Crotty joined the company in 1997.

Senator Clinton also highlighted Crotty’s service on the Lower Manhattan Development board, which was created after the September 11th terrorist attacks to help spur the recovery of Lower Manhattan. “In serving in that capacity, Paul has embodied that tremendous New York spirit and determination.


8 posted on 04/12/2005 12:57:49 PM PDT by taxesareforever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Byrd is correct about that. Silence can be "consent."


9 posted on 04/12/2005 1:01:30 PM PDT by justshutupandtakeit (Public Enemy #1, the RATmedia.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Recovering_Democrat

Yes, that term "allowing" jumped out at me as well. Allowing them to come to a vote is more accurate.


10 posted on 04/12/2005 1:02:57 PM PDT by traderrob6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

You, me and Byrd. What a triumvirate.


11 posted on 04/12/2005 1:03:30 PM PDT by justshutupandtakeit (Public Enemy #1, the RATmedia.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: taxesareforever
Calling it an “absolute delight” to testify on his behalf before the Senate Judiciary Committee, Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton enthusiastically endorsed the nomination of Buffalo Native Paul Crotty to a seat on the federal bench.

This is scary. I want to know more about this person.

12 posted on 04/12/2005 1:05:10 PM PDT by Digger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: justshutupandtakeit

We need to at least TRY IT and if they get upset then just give them the BYRD!.......


13 posted on 04/12/2005 1:06:20 PM PDT by Red Badger (Entrepreneurs find a need and fill it. Politicians create a need and fill it........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Ah yes, the Senate war continues ...


14 posted on 04/12/2005 1:12:22 PM PDT by Princip. Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Digger
My thoughts exactly. Any ringing endorsement from HRC should cast doubt upon this nominee. Also, the 95-0 confirmation is suspicious. Given these two facts, it is impossible that this guy has any conservative bonafides.

Does anyone know anything about him?
15 posted on 04/12/2005 1:15:08 PM PDT by kluge5180
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: kluge5180

confirmations used to be unanimous, or nearly so. That ended when Teddy "Borked" the process


16 posted on 04/12/2005 1:26:26 PM PDT by digger48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
Senate Confirms a Judge

And, this is headline news.

17 posted on 04/12/2005 1:38:46 PM PDT by Right_in_Virginia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: digger48
One possibility in this case is that this guy is only a district judge and the Dems don't want to waste political capital opposing him.
18 posted on 04/12/2005 1:51:24 PM PDT by kluge5180
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: kluge5180

This is his resume. Not very informative, though. Most recently, he was the president of Verizon.
http://www.usdoj.gov/olp/crottyresume.htm
He was originally nominated in 2004 but did not make it out of committee. Re-nominated this year.


19 posted on 04/12/2005 3:04:50 PM PDT by AdrianR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: AdrianR

Thanks!

I agree. Impossible to glean his judicial philosophy from the resume.


20 posted on 04/12/2005 8:06:02 PM PDT by kluge5180
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson