Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Do Women Really Want a Male Birth Control Pill?
Newsday ^ | 4/11/05 | Glenn Sacks

Posted on 04/18/2005 12:30:17 PM PDT by PercivalWalks

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-134 next last

1 posted on 04/18/2005 12:30:25 PM PDT by PercivalWalks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: PercivalWalks

Man, this pill is great.

Women can't have it both ways. I wouldn't presume to tell my wife what to do with her reproductive system, we would discuss our options and come to a mutual conclusion. There's no reason why I shouldn't be included in that process.


2 posted on 04/18/2005 12:32:35 PM PDT by ruiner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PercivalWalks

Most women won't trust a man to wash his own laundry, and they are going to trust him to take a pill every day?


3 posted on 04/18/2005 12:32:43 PM PDT by gridlock (ELIMINATE PERVERSE INCENTIVES)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PercivalWalks
Woman #2: “That’s what the pill has given men—a right to be perpetual adolescents. It’s given them veto power over women who want to have children.”

How's that for an immature disgusting bitch trying to entrap a male? Unnngh! I thought having a child should be a joint decision between 2 consenting adults. How silly of me to be one to decide for myself if I am ready or not.

4 posted on 04/18/2005 12:33:54 PM PDT by Fierce Allegiance (MIF = the Mexican Invasion Force)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gridlock

Lets see, i think this is great. I take enough pills everyday as it is, if my husband could take a pill I'd be all over it! However, I would help him remember as I'd ask him almost every day to remember, LOL!


5 posted on 04/18/2005 12:34:31 PM PDT by Halls
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: PercivalWalks
The pill will help ensure that men only have children in the context that’s best for men--a stable marriage.

Happily, this is also the best context for women and children.

Since they have yet to develop a pill for women which has no side-effects, I'm a tad skeptical about this one.
6 posted on 04/18/2005 12:34:46 PM PDT by Gingersnap
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PercivalWalks

Women will still have the same level of control they had before. They can still take the pill.

However, men will have an extra option to spare pregnancy with this.


7 posted on 04/18/2005 12:37:36 PM PDT by ConservativeMind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PercivalWalks

I wonder what this will do to the presumption of paternity in a marriage? Will the law REQUIRE a woman to become pregnant by her husband? What if she unilaterally decides to go to a sperm clinic without telling the husband? Under the law in many states (see CF) he would STILL be the legal father.

Of course this MIGHT allow men to get in a faster response for that absurdly short paternity fraud period in CF and have more men NOT signing those acknowledgments of paternity.


8 posted on 04/18/2005 12:38:01 PM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #9 Removed by Moderator

Comment #10 Removed by Moderator

To: gridlock

I think the point is that women would find men will not STOP taking birth control. I bet this will have some very rapid divorces or parternity fraud types of cases.


11 posted on 04/18/2005 12:39:32 PM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMind
Women will still have the same level of control they had before.

Not really, They have less control. They can no longer entrap an unwilling but trusting partner.
12 posted on 04/18/2005 12:41:17 PM PDT by contemplator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: PercivalWalks

hmmmmm, what's good for the goos is good for the gander.

wait a minute...let's rephrase.

What's good for the gander is good for the goose.


13 posted on 04/18/2005 12:41:52 PM PDT by peacebaby (Carpe dune!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fierce Allegiance
It’s given them veto power over women who want to have children.

Here's a news flash, world...men already HAVE that power. It's called the "keep it in your pants" option, and is quite reliable.

14 posted on 04/18/2005 12:41:58 PM PDT by Oberon (What does it take to make government shrink?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: PercivalWalks

So when are they going to develop a pill to let children avoid having parents? :)

Oh, I guess they already have one, it's called Prozac. Although the cause and effect are in debate, clearly there are examples how it ended up with that result.


15 posted on 04/18/2005 12:43:57 PM PDT by anymouse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Baynative

15 years of marriage and 4 daughters later, I don't have a clue what women want.


16 posted on 04/18/2005 12:44:05 PM PDT by Fierce Allegiance (MIF = the Mexican Invasion Force)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: longtermmemmory

With the rate of complaints I hear from married men about the lack of sex after children, such a pill could prove quite popular.

I surely hope, though, that men aren't having children now simply because they didn't want to wear a condom on those occasions.


17 posted on 04/18/2005 12:44:16 PM PDT by ConservativeMind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: PercivalWalks

One consequence will be that married men who might otherwise not stray, will feel much less restraint in regards to having affairs.


18 posted on 04/18/2005 12:44:41 PM PDT by contemplator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oberon

Hear, hear.


19 posted on 04/18/2005 12:46:50 PM PDT by Ruth A.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Fierce Allegiance

"15 years of marriage and 4 daughters later, I don't have a clue what women want."

Apparently, in your case, little girls! Congrats!


20 posted on 04/18/2005 12:47:12 PM PDT by Frank_Discussion (May the wings of Liberty never lose a feather!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-134 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson