A Reputation in Tatters - Time To Impeach Bush (by Paul Craig Roberts)

Chronicles Magazine ^ | 5/20/05

[iconoclast]

What I posted is precisely the truth

No, my fellow FReeper, the administration has finally denied all that horse shit, and no, I'm not gonna spend a half hour documenting it.

[Gondring]

I asked a question, thinking you might actually have some support to these claims you were making--some point I was missing--and you call it "b*tching"?

I guess I should take it that you made up the stuff about Bush's spending?

Just because I don't want a socialist Dem means I have to praise a statist? Hmmm...I praise our president where he deserves it, but I am still not happy with the damage he is doing. I'm sorry, but "it could be worse" is no principle for running a country or judging leaders. Kinda like "your honor, if I hadn't robbed him, he coulda spent that money on drugs!"

I'd rather President Bush treated our borders as borders, treated our Constitution as a Constitution, and treated our citizens as having the right to make decisions for themselves without being monitored. But yes, he could be FAR worse, and I give him credit for supporting the troops, trying to restore some class to the office of president, etc.

[iconoclast]

Good post.

[iconoclast]

Bush is just ramping up revenues for 30 years of RAT socialism. Govenment spending is pretty much on autopilot when it comes to entitlements, blmae 30 years of RAT control of spending.

Sorry Pal, your post is a total very sorry surrender.

[John Lenin]

No pal, it's reality. Welcome to the real world.

[Pharmboy]

Time to put Paul Craig Roberts on full ignore.

[Chewbacca]

" Why haven't you moved o Mexico?"

Because I would rather move to Argentina or Tazmania than Mexico.

[Billthedrill]

...and no, I'm not gonna spend a half hour documenting it.

More bluster. You won't because you can't, and the administration has done no such thing as to deny it.

Let's make it real easy - do you affirm or deny that the intervention was authorized by a joint resolution of Congress? Do you affirm or deny that the Clinton administration believed that there were WMD in Iraq? Do you affirm or deny that casus belli was not the presence of WMD but the refusal of Saddam to provide proof that numerous UN resolutions required that he had destroyed the WMD known to exist? Those were my points. Refute them or concede them.

[ArrogantBustard]

Muslims hated the US since the days of Jimmy Carter Thomas Jefferson.

[Knitting A Conundrum]

....to the shores of Tripoli.....

[Gondring]

Fightin' words, my FRiend.

[iconoclast]

Iraq was helpless, defenseless, and ready for pillage and we proved it.

What did we prove by by verifying that fact, other than if you don't want it to happen to you, you better get a nuclear deterrent?

[Gondring]

Twins?
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/1407279/posts?page=24#24

[ArrogantBustard]

I swear, I posted my comment before reading anybody else's!

[iconoclast]

Don't make it complicated.

You and Peach are dumber than a pile of rocks.

[Gondring]

I guess North Korea and Iran will test that theory.

[Gondring]

I swear, I posted my comment before reading anybody else's!

I swear, your honor...I knew the gun was loaded!

[mountainfolk]

I see you've been rereading your posts.

[Peach]

I see you understand full well how he'll respond. He has nothing else.

Facts mean nothing to some freepers and their desire to undermine the Bush presidency is so obvious that I often wonder who is paying them because surely there is no reason to come here without a paycheck as their ideology is so far removed from conservatism.