Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Who was Newsweek's source? Analyst believes anti-Bush CIA 'weasel' set up reporter Isikoff
WorldNetDaily.com ^ | May 21, 2005 | WorldNetDaily.com

Posted on 05/23/2005 7:24:30 PM PDT by Jacob Kell

A disgruntled former CIA operative hoping to hurt President Bush was likely Newsweek's source on the fake Quran-in-the-toilet story, says geopolitical expert Jack Wheeler, and his action now means journalists will no longer trust the ex-Langley agents forced out by chief Porter Goss.

In a column on his intelligence website, To the Point, Wheeler writes of this "silver lining" to the Newsweek story penned by reporter Michael Isikoff.

(Excerpt) Read more at worldnetdaily.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Cuba; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Government; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; Philosophy; Politics/Elections; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: bush; cia; ciareform; guantanamo; isikoff; jackwheeler; korandesecration; newsweek; portergoss; rogueweasels; traitor; unnamedsource; waronterror
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last
Goss's cleaning is WAY past time. WHoever the weasel is, he should be sent to prison for the rest of his life. Seeing that makes me think that the CIA sucks.
1 posted on 05/23/2005 7:24:37 PM PDT by Jacob Kell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Jacob Kell

Bush should have cleaned house after he took over...but as usual...he is being nice to the democrats...Gaggggg


2 posted on 05/23/2005 7:28:11 PM PDT by dinok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dinok

Wonder how Condi's coming with the State Department ?


3 posted on 05/23/2005 7:30:02 PM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Jacob Kell

Give the jerk a bunk next to that scum....Pollard.


4 posted on 05/23/2005 7:32:22 PM PDT by CROSSHIGHWAYMAN (NO PRISONERS!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jacob Kell

Good little article. Makes alot of sense.


5 posted on 05/23/2005 7:35:40 PM PDT by Dat Mon (will work for clever tagline)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eric in the Ozarks

I havent heard that Cond8i is cleaning house...if she had, the times would be screaming bloody murder.

Hillary went after a few people in the travel office to let everyone know she was to be feared. Our side just doesnt have the guts to do what needs to be done.


6 posted on 05/23/2005 7:36:26 PM PDT by dinok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Eric in the Ozarks

>>Wonder how Condi's coming with the State Department?<<

You can follow developments over there with these three (now two) State Dept Employee Blogs:

http://diplomadic.blogspot.com/ (defunct since Feb)

http://dailydemarche.blogspot.com/

http://newsisyphus.blogspot.com/


7 posted on 05/23/2005 7:37:43 PM PDT by FreedomCalls (It's the "Statue of Liberty," not the "Statue of Security.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: dinok
Our side just doesnt have the guts to do what needs to be done.

Then why the disgruntled CIA people? Looks like Goss DOES have guts.

8 posted on 05/23/2005 7:39:42 PM PDT by what's up
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Jacob Kell

Could it be true? Maybe. Could Newsweek do an order of magnitude better job in research and verification? Absolutely.


9 posted on 05/23/2005 7:41:11 PM PDT by jimfree (Freep and ye shall find.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jacob Kell

This might or might not be a silver lining. Shinseki was pushed out by Rumsfeld, his doctrines thrown aside, and those boosters of the president celebrated. it took over 18 months for the administration to begrudgingly admit Shinseki's doctrines on force structure should have been part of the post invasion occupation.

Only time will tell if those men thrown aside by Goss were correct, or at least should have been held on as counsel to balance the viewpoints within the CIA.


10 posted on 05/23/2005 7:41:42 PM PDT by JerseyHighlander
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jacob Kell
I have always thought that the question of "who was the source" was more important than the Newsweek part. They're just...idiots.

The "source" knew what he/she/it was doing. That is where the real stories are. We have begun to root out the Oil for Food scandal at the UN. This is next.

11 posted on 05/23/2005 7:46:21 PM PDT by pollyannaish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jacob Kell

Honestly this "Scandal" does not matter, but it would be worth setting up Newsweek to bite such a tasty trap.

Stupid Muslims/Arabs/Islamic/Towel-Heads/Etc will hate what is not their culture no matter what we do unless we all convert or die...


12 posted on 05/23/2005 7:53:46 PM PDT by thebaron512
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pollyannaish

Do you think Kofi will blame his tribulations on Karl Rove or on the VRWC? Of course they are one and the same as far as the left is concerned.

It's probably America's fault because we didn't specifically tell anyone not to profit from the sale of Iraiqi oil at the expense of innocent Iraqis.


13 posted on 05/23/2005 7:56:04 PM PDT by SusaninOhio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: CROSSHIGHWAYMAN

No, no man, didn't you see? Just the other day a group of Jewish buttheads were protesting for I think Laura Bush on behalf of releasing Jonathan?
He'll be released any moment.
He's a national hero after all.

Hang the puke spy.


14 posted on 05/23/2005 8:19:39 PM PDT by Joe Boucher (an enemy of islam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Jacob Kell

Maybe there was no source at all?! 100% Fabrication.


15 posted on 05/23/2005 8:19:51 PM PDT by jungleboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jacob Kell

A very long shot, but possibly Valerie Plame?


16 posted on 05/23/2005 8:38:52 PM PDT by solzhenitsyn ("Live Not By Lies")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jacob Kell

If this is true that's one very stupid "anti-Bush CIA official".


17 posted on 05/23/2005 8:39:49 PM PDT by Fledermaus (Nothing in this RINO deal guarantees Brown, Owen and Pryor will be CONFIRMED!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JerseyHighlander

Oh, please!


18 posted on 05/23/2005 8:44:40 PM PDT by Deb (Beat him, strip him and bring him to my tent!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: pollyannaish

Newsweek isn't any more interested in exposing and punishing their "source" than CBS was in exposing their document forger. I'm pretty sure that's how you tell they were part of the conspiracy.


19 posted on 05/23/2005 8:48:08 PM PDT by Deb (Beat him, strip him and bring him to my tent!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Deb

True. Newsweek is so predictable it isn't even newsworthy. It's also part of the problem.

But there have to be real journalists out there somewhere. After all, Eric Shawn finally had the guts/integrity to go after the UN!

So maybe not Newsweek...but somebody else.


20 posted on 05/23/2005 8:55:57 PM PDT by pollyannaish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson