To: Clintonfatigued
All of this could be solved if we eliminated those federal assistance program.
Voila. Problem vanishes.
To: flashbunny
You're only partly right. In order for there to be support for ending such programs, work has to pay enough for the workers to subsist on their own.
To: flashbunny; Willie Green; Wolfie; ex-snook; Jhoffa_; FITZ; arete; FreedomPoster; Red Jones; ...
"Because of Wal-Mart's inadequate wages and benefits, Wal-Mart employees are eligible for $2.5 billion in Federal assistance, which comes from your tax dollars."
All of this could be solved if we eliminated those federal assistance program. Voila. Problem vanishes. Please elaborate. It is very interesting.
18 posted on
05/26/2005 6:39:02 PM PDT by
A. Pole
(The Law of Comparative Advantage: "Americans should not have children and should not go to college")
To: flashbunny
You mean the unconstitutional giveaways? I agree. Get rid of them and the people working for minimum wage will either leave Wal-Mart for a better job or be happy getting paid squat.
55 posted on
05/26/2005 6:57:49 PM PDT by
Blood of Tyrants
(G-d is not a Republican. But Satan is definitely a Democrat.)
To: flashbunny
BINGO! I used this exact argument this week with someone.
Besides I've been in WalMart several times and have never been exploited yet.
504 posted on
05/28/2005 7:24:43 AM PDT by
festus
(The constitution may be flawed but its a whole lot better than what we have now.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson