Skip to comments.
Supreme Court justice faces boot from home?
WND ^
| June 28, 2005
| Ron Strom
Posted on 06/28/2005 4:05:47 PM PDT by Nachum
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-73 next last
To: Nachum
A private developer contacted the local government in Supreme Court Justice David Souter's hometown in New Hampshire yesterday asking that the property of the judge who voted in favor of a controversial decision allowing a city to take residents' homes for private development be seized to make room for a new hotel. We can only hope ...
To: BipolarBob
GOOD, I PREFER A SECOND FLOOR ROOM.
42
posted on
06/28/2005 5:35:29 PM PDT
by
pointsal
To: JohnD9207
Bader and Souter make a lovely couple.
They could live together in Celibacy City.
43
posted on
06/28/2005 5:36:49 PM PDT
by
hdstmf
To: Hostage
I suggest he go public with an IPO and use the proceeds to erect other hotels (or even indoor gun ranges) on the homes of the other four 'justices' that are party to this act of fascism. To be fair, he should THEN go after any selectmen who DO vote for this use of eminent domain ... one at a time, to see what excuses the others come up with to disallow it ... and then, in an expert move, go after his own house.
Then, sell the hotel, and go after that land again to build an EVEN bugger hotel ... you know, big enough to provide $5 more a year in tax revenue.
(For bonus points, erect a giant 10-commandments monument on the property, then grant the hotel to the town as town office space with the caveat that the monument can never be covered or removed.)
I'm all for this!
To: Outland
what if he does and a 4 to 4 tie occurs? I believe he then LOSES his house, as the current opinion of the Supreme Court is that this is allowed, and they'd need a 5-4 (or other majority) to overturn.
To: Nachum
it'll serve that f---er right
46
posted on
06/28/2005 6:04:29 PM PDT
by
xrp
(Fox News Channel should rename itself the Missing Persons Network)
To: All
47
posted on
06/28/2005 6:06:57 PM PDT
by
tomkat
To: tomkat
How do we go about investing in this development?
48
posted on
06/28/2005 6:20:33 PM PDT
by
AnimalLover
( ((Are there special rules and regulations for the big guys?)))
To: tomkat
Perhaps we should know the info on the 5 person Board of Selectmen. They are the ones who'd have to approve the eviction.
Imagine the tourism in that town if they could pull this off - or even if they got a giant amount of press by just voting to condem.
To: yall
Check out the thread I linked.
The guy behind it is FReeper 'Freemedia'.
See post #69 for more info...
50
posted on
06/28/2005 6:34:24 PM PDT
by
tomkat
To: Ladysmith
"So tell me, if the local government rejects it, can the developer take them to court? And if he continues to lose, couldn't this theoretically wind up in the U.S. Supreme Court??"
Oh that would be funny!! LOL!! I think this is great! LOL!!
51
posted on
06/28/2005 6:37:20 PM PDT
by
GloriaJane
(http://music.download.com/gloriajane "Seems Like Our Press Has Turned Against Our Country")
To: All
OOPS - Freestar, not Freemedia
Click here for his post on the other thread.
52
posted on
06/28/2005 6:37:42 PM PDT
by
tomkat
To: Nachum
Clements says some people have already offered to put money into the projectCount me in.
53
posted on
06/28/2005 6:41:26 PM PDT
by
T. Buzzard Trueblood
("The Klan is needed today as never before." - Robert Byrd, 1946)
To: Jambe
Oh! And you have to have a clown room! For clowns Palosi with her runaway bride look and Kennedy with his drunken red nose look LOL!!!
54
posted on
06/28/2005 6:43:07 PM PDT
by
GloriaJane
(http://music.download.com/gloriajane "Seems Like Our Press Has Turned Against Our Country")
To: Outland
We can get the bulldozers in there much faster than even Souter can file an appeal.
Hopefully there are some Souter family graves on the site so they may be appropriately desecrated.
55
posted on
06/28/2005 7:08:42 PM PDT
by
muawiyah
(q)
To: JohnD9207
The Ginsburg harpie does live in DC from time to time. Could be a tad more difficult to take and desecrate her quarters because the Constitution gives Congress full jurisdiction over the District.
Still, she has friends. We might target one of them for this sort of thing.
56
posted on
06/28/2005 7:10:09 PM PDT
by
muawiyah
(q)
To: Nachum
I bet he could find a shole lot of investors on this forum. Heck, I'd do it just for a little revenge,uh, that is to say, to help the public interests of his old hometown.
57
posted on
06/28/2005 7:15:47 PM PDT
by
freeangel
( (free speech is only good until someone else doesn't like what you say))
To: Hostage
suggest he go public with an IPO and use the proceeds to erect other hotels (or even indoor gun ranges) on the homes of the other four 'justices' that are party to this act of fascism and other libs who advocate this - and also start with some of the town councilmen - and liberal senators and congressmen and see how long it takes before they squeal for repeal - while waving the Constitution
58
posted on
06/28/2005 7:33:02 PM PDT
by
maine-iac7
("...BUT YOU CAN'T FOOL ALL THE PEOPLE ALL THE TIME." Lincoln)
To: Paladin2
I understand there a properties in Georgetown and Chappaqua that might also be appropriate.
Boston, perhaps???
59
posted on
06/28/2005 7:36:34 PM PDT
by
Ethyl
To: Nachum
Souter 34 Cilley Hill Road, Weare, N. H. 03281
Got That....
60
posted on
06/28/2005 7:37:08 PM PDT
by
maine-iac7
("...BUT YOU CAN'T FOOL ALL THE PEOPLE ALL THE TIME." Lincoln)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-73 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson