Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Fred Phelps the Viper: Clues to What's Driving Him-- Al Gore? [God-hates-faXs ping]
Several Sources Linked | July 1, 2005 | Arthur Wildfire! March

Posted on 07/01/2005 2:11:39 PM PDT by Arthur Wildfire! March

Free Republic Exclusive

Fred Phelps, leader of the "God-hates-faXs" movement, is planning on crashing the funeral of one of our War Dead on July 4th. Why? To spread his message of anti-homosexual SPAM in the most inappropriate way imaginable. There's a time and a place for everything. He's a publicity whore, as far as I'm concerned.

Here are snips from an earlier FR Report:

"A SF SGT E-5, James Stewart, will be buried in St. Petersburg, Florida on July 4, 2005. It's wholly appropriate that he be buried on our nation's birthday, because Sergeant Stewart gave his life for our country.... and all of us. He was killed in Iraq by a roadside bomb, call an IED in MilSpeak. IED is short for "Improvised Explosive Device." [snip]

"A Topeka, Kansas freak has announced plans to disrupt the burial with chants, bull horns and signs that read, "Thank God for IEDs" "God Hates America," "This Soldier Is In Hell," and "God Wanted This Soldier Dead." " [snip]

[posted by Mindbender26-- link posted at bottom of next post.]

It's my belief that whether that "Topeka, Kansas freak" shows up there or not, it's a good time we try to uncover just what that "freak", Fred Phelps, is about.

And while the clock is ticking, the anti-Christians are gloating, trying to compare Phelps with all Christian Conservatives. Fred Phelps is like a custom-made punching bag for the Left. And guess what? Maybe he is. Can you spell, "Al Gore?"

Fred Phelps went even further than I go [saying a lot, I have to tell you] , even further than Repent America goes, in calling sodomites to task, using our War Dead as props! He's stabbed our fighting forces in the back time-after-time. And I've been digging today to figure out why.

Here's what I've uncovered so far [and if you have sourcing that can confirm or deny, please contribute.]

1. Phelps was reportely a propaganda operative for Saddam Hussein.

2. He was reportedly a propaganda operative for Fidel Castro.

3. Fred Phelps was reportedly very tight with Al Gore, along with photographic evidence.

4. He was reportedly a narcotics abuser.

5. It's widely reported that Phelps was a shady lawyer, and several others his family have been practicing lawyers.

Let's take this step-by-step:

[Continued on my next post]


TOPICS: Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: algore; andthatsthefaxjack; castro; dncfalseprophets; evil; falseprophets; faxesnotscriptual; faxmachinesareevil; fredphelps; gatheringofeagles; godhatesfags; godhatesfaxes; goe; gore; jamesstewart; letshaveafaxburning; pastor; pgr; rico; saddam; saddamhussein; satanskinkos; sticktothefax; thoushaltnotfax; tonysnow; westboro; westborobaptist; whatarethefax
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-75 last
To: Lazamataz
I think Phelps is gay.

He very well may be -- I've wondered the same thing myself. Be that as it may, having seen his friendly folks protesting outside my very own church, we can say a couple of things for sure: a) their not rational; and b) they're the closest thing to nazis I've ever seen.

61 posted on 07/02/2005 12:24:39 PM PDT by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: r9etb
Sheesh ... They're not rational.
62 posted on 07/02/2005 12:26:26 PM PDT by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: strategofr

Sure thing.

...Then I entered the FR prior to registration....

We didn't have to register when FR started off. Anyone could post under any name. I was a bit of a rascal back then a few times, myself. I once posted as a troll named 'ash' and flamed at myself. In the middle of all the hoopla, poor ash came around and said, "I didn't post that." Not many people believed him. I think he was amused, though.

Nasty times, and I was actually as scheming as they were, I must confess. People often made different names to make it seem like you had five people disagreeing with you, when it was really only one nut. I never did that. Wanted to build up a single name, for the most part, one that would endure. But I did get carried away. Truth was coming at me 200 proof in a non-stop chug. Painful. And we weren't winning as much back then nationally.

Not to mention, I was a recovering liberal and thought the nation could be ripped apart. That's why militias were so big back then. It looked, to many of us, that the nation was on the verge of collapse.

I remember some militia guys came by and wanted to start a big stand-off with Clinton. I tried to talk them out of it, told them they'd just be playing into his hands. If they had any success, it would have meant martial law and ironically, more power for him.

They would have been terribly slandered by the Old Media, too. And the people would have been too confused to know they were on the peoples' side. Still couldn't talk them out of it. Then finally, I confess, I lied to them. I said, "You guys scare me more than Clinton." I didn't really mean it. Clinton had a contingency plan for martial law on 1-1-00. [Y2K.] I suspected he was going to cause fake chaos and enact it. But I had to stop them. So after that, they left. I hated to do it, but just like this Phelps guy, they went too far. Time was on our side, and I was one of those few who could sense it.

Thank God I was right and they were wrong. If I were wrong, if Clinton did attempt martial law without them taking action, back when the left had more media dominance, God knows how things would have turned out. I kept hammering away about that potential. I said, if we have martial law, it's because Clinton failed as a leader and should have resigned. I posted that every chance I had.

We had another problem: cross thread flame wars. I got into a three day flame war with 'val porter'. Val ended up calling me a 'nazi'. And the support I got after that skyrocketed for a while there, because people could tell I wasn't any freaking nazi.

What a time that was. Foul mouthed leftists were all over the place, trying to disrupt it. People could cuss a blue streak and get away with it. The leftists would team up on women and cuss so bad that not many women stayed around. That really, really ticked me off.

I was having fun a lot of the time, throwing political stink bombs at Clinton, skewering the illogic of the leftists, and getting into the general chaos. But a lot of people were run off. Men too. It was a much more hostile place than it is now. I tended to thrive off of that chaos, though. I let their own words hang them.


63 posted on 07/02/2005 12:32:55 PM PDT by Arthur Wildfire! March (<<< Ad Campaign for Durbin the Turban in profile)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Arthur Wildfire! March

"I was a bit of a rascal back then a few times, myself...Nasty times, and I was actually as scheming as they were, I must confess...We had another problem: cross thread flame wars...Foul mouthed leftists were all over the place, trying to disrupt it...I was having fun a lot of the time, throwing political stink bombs at Clinton, skewering the illogic of the leftists, and getting into the general chaos..."

Thank you very much for this whole, great story. It reminds me of the 60's, 70's, being on the Left, in the half-assed way I was, etc. I have enjoyed reading it tremendously. In addition, I knew nothing about it. You might consider writing a book on the subject (just a thought). The reason it could work is, the archives are still there (on site) to refresh your memory.


"...But I did get carried away. Truth was coming at me 200 proof in a non-stop chug. Painful. And we weren't winning as much back then nationally...Not to mention, I was a recovering liberal and thought the nation could be ripped apart..."

I got carried away too, in my time. It's funny, I just read an article somewhere about someone who stole a book from a bookstore back in the day because reading Sartre made her feel she "had to" to be authentic.

At the University of Michigan, in 1969, I threw rocks at the police. It is quite impossible to explain why. It was in the middle of 2 or 3 consecutive evenings/nights of rioting (rioting in the day did not appeal to us).

It's not like there was even a reason for it. It started as a gathering on the sidewalk in the "student/business area" of Ann Arbor (probably State Street.) I wasn't there, but, you know, everyone was a dope-smoking hippy at that time, and people just started to gather on the street at night, and it became a "party". The thing was, it spilled over into the street and blocked traffic, which was illegal.

The real thing though was, it made the merchants who owned stores there nervous (even though the stores were mainly closed in the evening). They were concerned about losing their expensive investments. Of course, we thought this was sinister.

The police started to arrive, and put pressure on people to disperse. There was a crowd packed against a plate glass storefront window. (These things are incredibly expensive.) It cracked from the pressure.

No one was hurt, but that was all it took, essentially to set off a chain of events that led to a full-scale riot. People were beaten. I was tear-gassed. I threw rocks. You had to be there...I can only hope I did not injure anyone and I am very sorry for what I did.


"That's why militias were so big back then...They would have been terribly slandered by the Old Media, too...Thank God I was right and they were wrong..."

I am with you 100% on this sort of thing. I view it as a constant danger to the Right, all these people with guns who imagine they can win the political battle with them. Also very bad are people who want to retaliate tit for tat against things like massive Democratic sign stealing.

Wrong. They would catch someone, and it would be on all media, 24/7 for weeks. When they do it (or even have the son of a Democratic bigwig slash tires of Republcan campaign workers, shoot a gun through a campaign office window in Tennessee, threaten to shoot Repub campaign workers in PA), it is not "news" and not covered.

We stand together on this one.

Thanks again for the great stories.


64 posted on 07/02/2005 3:17:37 PM PDT by strategofr (What did happen to those 293 boxes of secret FBI files (esp on Senators) Hillary stole?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur

There are over 60 groups that refer to themselves as baptists. Some are Christian, some are not.


65 posted on 07/02/2005 3:24:41 PM PDT by tang-soo (Prophecy of the Seventy Weeks - Read Daniel Chapter 9)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: strategofr

I'm glad a lot of the oldest archives were gone. Some of those moments are best left buried. But still, it's good for people to have a notion of the origins. I wish that more people understood the importance of free speech. They don't have a clue what would happen if they meddle too much with free speech.


66 posted on 07/02/2005 4:55:48 PM PDT by Arthur Wildfire! March (<<< Ad Campaign for Durbin the Turban in profile)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Arthur Wildfire! March

"They don't have a clue what would happen if they meddle too much with free speech."

You know, its a mixture. Some don't know, but the hidden drivers behind McCain/Fiengold do know. Their goal is an unfree society, albiet of a modern "European Socialist" style instead of the old Stalinist model. Of course, this is not what they say.


67 posted on 07/03/2005 2:00:18 PM PDT by strategofr (What did happen to those 293 boxes of secret FBI files (esp on Senators) Hillary stole?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Army Air Corps

I've known a lot of Baptists in my life and Phelps is NOT A BAPTIST.


68 posted on 05/29/2006 9:33:07 AM PDT by CyberAnt (Drive-by Media: Fake news, fake documents, fake polls)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: CyberAnt

Like I said, he is a Baptist only in his warped, pea-sized brain. He is a waste of valuable oxygen.


69 posted on 05/29/2006 9:55:30 AM PDT by Army Air Corps (Four fried chickens and a coke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur
He's also a Baptist.

Or claims to be one at any rate. His is apparently a "Standalone" church not part of any Baptist convention.

70 posted on 05/29/2006 12:51:54 PM PDT by El Gato
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Arthur Wildfire! March

BUMP


71 posted on 04/19/2007 3:50:10 PM PDT by The Spirit Of Allegiance (Public Employees: Honor Your Oaths! Defend the Constitution from Enemies--Foreign and Domestic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Arthur Wildfire! March

Now if we could only link him to Osama-obama, imagine the fun we could have!


72 posted on 04/04/2008 8:21:36 AM PDT by Merlinator (Stop the Obamination!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Arthur Wildfire! March
Koran burning "church" & their support of Westboro/Phelps cult funeral crashing tactics:

In Support of Westboro Baptist (Nutjobs of a feather...)
Dove World Outreach Center ^ | 21 April 10 | Fran Ingram
Posted on Tuesday, September 07, 2010 10:02:04 PM by Lou Budvis

On Sunday April 18, Westboro Baptist Church came to Gainesville. One of their stops was a liberal "Open doors, open hearts, open minds," church near us, so we took part of our Sunday Service time and went as a church to stand with them.

We have also learned that when you speak out about what God hates, you will be hated. We do not agree with all of Westboro's methods, but we admire their determination to find radical ways to preach the truth of the Bible, as we do. Most churches and Pastors in America try to stand on neutral ground. They are lost, weak and sick and need to repent.

(Excerpt) Read more at doveworld.org ...


73 posted on 09/08/2010 2:23:34 AM PDT by piasa (Attitude adjustments offered here free of charge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: piasa
Thank you for the ping. I am very curious about Fred Phelps. I hate him.
74 posted on 09/12/2010 11:53:07 AM PDT by Arthur Wildfire! March (Conservative scandals? Boring. DNC scandals? Exciting. We are sick of being excited.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: piasa

Oh yeah. Now I see why I like the headline.


75 posted on 09/12/2010 11:54:00 AM PDT by Arthur Wildfire! March (Conservative scandals? Boring. DNC scandals? Exciting. We are sick of being excited.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-75 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson