Actually, you are wrong here. This has been used before, and the Supreme Court agreed that they had no ability to review a law that Congress (and the President) specifically shielded from such review.
Our Constitutional expert-in-residence, the honorable Congressman BillyBob, can probably give you the relevant case(s).
Some tree-hugging lawyers in Seattle (IIRC) got an injunction against the further construction of the pipeline under an obscure statute. Congress then withdrew jurisdiction from the courts. Then the court which had issued the injunction withdrew it, ruling that it was without power to act any further in the matter.
A full discussion of this subject would include a description of the "fundamental law" exception to this general provision in the language of Article III, Section 1, of the Constitution. However, the power to do this is long established and repeatedly recognized.
Congressman Billybob