Lets see, there is another possible reason that it did not make it into the final report...."Conflict of interest" Gorelick was on the committee.
Nothing to see here folks.. move along....
/sarc
Sounds like a case of volitional amnesia.
Jamie Gorlick strikes again ~ Bump!
What's to keep someone in Congress from calling Gorelick up to testify?
Gorelick was our top person on keeping information from getting where it needed to go. Apparently she continued that role to the hilt on this commission.
Atta. Prague.
May have been an errant sighting, but here we have another instance of a potential sighting denied because it doesn't fit a timeline reliant on accurate and efficient transportation/border records. And omits the possibility of travelling under a different name.
Welcome, America, to your kakistocracy.
Time to drain the D.C. swamp in 2006.
(Thanks to Lee Rodgers of KSFO for remembering a word for what we got.)
It ain't your grandfather's democracy no more. It ain't the "greatest generation's" America. It's post-America I guess. Right, Ms Gorelicker (sp)?
Well Freeperville and the Blogs should put this very lame excuse to death quickly so we can get on to the next cover up try. We are supposed to blindly accept the whereabouts of Atta et al as being a more important fact than the known existence of an al-Queda cell in the U.S. prior to 9/11 that included 4 of the terrorists. Give me a frigg'n break.
I think we need a 9/11 (2) hearing to look into the 9/11 (1) hearing. First up Jamie Gorlick
This is for obvious cover for Gorelick and the like. Despicable.
Gorelick is a criminal on so many levels.
So....the commission lied? Sakes.
So they had a pre-determined outcome and Able Danger information didn't fit how they wanted the report to read.
And another freeper heard a radio call today. It was a 9/11 family member who said that Gorelick and another Commission staffer controlled all the information that got presented to the full Commission. For Gorelick, it's all about damage control and protecting the Clinton legacy. And that's what Sandy Berger's stuffing documents into his pants was all about too.
"the information was not consistent with what the commission knew about Atta's whereabouts before the attacks,"
What the commission knew about Atta's whereabouts is obviously wrong. Whitewash of the Clinton Administration.
This reminds me of the contention that Atta never went to Prague in August of 2001 - despite the insistence of the Czech government that he was there.
Try to imagine if these geniuses on the 9/11 Commission had been running the Warren Commission.
We would have had not only a magic bullet that hit Kennedy, zig-zagged, hit Texas Governor John Connelly, and then exited through Connelly's wrist, the bullet would have been fired by an unlucky hunter somewhere near Shreveport, bounced off a tree, tumbled through the air, passed through the Texas School Book Depository, out the window, just missing Lee Harvey Oswald as he finished up his box lunch of fried chicken and sody pop.
From the article:
"Staff members now are searching documents in the National Archives to look for notes from the meeting in Afghanistan and any other possible references to Atta and Able Danger, Felzenberg said."
Sandy Bergler alert!!! Tell Felzenberg to check Bergler's trousers for the documents.