Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Science
Arrows on a composite image of the comet Tempel 1 point to two areas where the surface is smooth instead of spotted with depressions.
1 posted on 09/07/2005 12:10:02 PM PDT by neverdem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: neverdem

kewl--bump


2 posted on 09/07/2005 12:11:24 PM PDT by Mamzelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PatrickHenry

ping


3 posted on 09/07/2005 12:11:44 PM PDT by neverdem (May you be in heaven a half hour before the devil knows that you're dead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem
Clays and carbonates both require liquid water to form.

Sez them..........

4 posted on 09/07/2005 12:13:27 PM PDT by Red Badger (United States Marine Corps.....An army of WON!...........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

bump for later.

Could be that they are interpreting their IR signals with a terracentric view.

It also seems a bit rash to me to be generalizing data for all Oort and Kuiper objects using data from just one.


5 posted on 09/07/2005 12:13:52 PM PDT by DBrow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

It looks like an interesting article, but no way am I going to the New York Times to read the rest.


7 posted on 09/07/2005 12:18:01 PM PDT by EternalHope (Boycott everything French forever. Including their vassal nations.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

Metaresearch.org has some explanations for this. Interesting none the less


9 posted on 09/07/2005 12:18:38 PM PDT by Shark24
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

"How do clays and carbonates form in frozen comets where there isn't liquid water?"

Remnants from a previous solar system I venture to guess.


10 posted on 09/07/2005 12:19:47 PM PDT by PfromHoGro (The W knows.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

It's taken a while for the analysis to start getting some results, as expected. The comet seems to be like a cottonball cone you would buy and possibly eat at the fair. There isn't much substance to it. But what there is would be very useful on the moon if they can get it there.


12 posted on 09/07/2005 12:22:10 PM PDT by RightWhale (We in heep dip trubble)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Hmmm... evidence of Tiamat? What do Enki, Enlil, and the rest of the Nibiruians have to say about this? ;-)


14 posted on 09/07/2005 12:24:50 PM PDT by adaven (www.conservative-talk.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem
"How do you do that and then how do you put that stuff into a comet that forms out by Pluto?" Dr. Lisse said.

the obvious answer is that it formed somewhere warmer.

16 posted on 09/07/2005 12:31:09 PM PDT by CzarNicky (The problem with bad ideas is that they seemed like good ideas at the time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem
but silicates line up in neat crystal structures only when they are warmed to 1,300 degrees Fahrenheit - temperatures reached at around the orbit of Mercury - and then cooled.

Uh huh, and diamonds can only be formed under high pressure.

(Unless you are growing them commercially in a low pressure chemical vapor deposition reactor)...

24 posted on 09/07/2005 12:38:11 PM PDT by null and void (Does my life *really* need a sarcasm tag????)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

Its obviously an Ice Rink, anyone who loves hockey could have explained this!

GAME ON!


29 posted on 09/07/2005 12:51:25 PM PDT by Mikey_1962
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem
Nice post.

It has long been known that our star; the sun, is a fourth generation star. In other words, it was created from the dust and debris of an earlier star. Which, the earlier star, was formed from the dust and debris from a yet even earlier star. Thisstar as also formed from the debris of an earlier star which was formed from a star that was created from the debris left over from the big bang.

By all accounts, each star had planets, as we know know that systems with planetary bodies are quite common.

Why would it be too difficult to understand that one of these earlier planets had life on it? Is it really too difficult to understand the life form that might be billions of years old?
34 posted on 09/07/2005 2:04:08 PM PDT by vannrox (The Preamble to the Bill of Rights - without it, our Bill of Rights is meaningless!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

ping


44 posted on 09/20/2005 9:21:11 PM PDT by Bittersweetmd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Swordmaker

third of four


45 posted on 10/05/2005 9:38:00 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (Down with Dhimmicrats! I last updated by FR profile on Sunday, August 14, 2005.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Catastrophism

46 posted on 05/09/2006 9:16:09 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Swordmaker
Phase diagram of water revised
PhysOrg
Thursday, October 5, 2006
Supercomputer simulations by two Sandia researchers have significantly altered the theoretical diagram universally used by scientists to understand the characteristics of water at extreme temperatures and pressures. The new computational model also expands the known range of water's electrical conductivity. The Sandia theoretical work showed that phase boundaries for "metallic water" -- water with its electrons able to migrate like a metal's -- should be lowered from 7,000 to 4,000 kelvin and from 250 to 100 gigapascals. (A phase boundary describes conditions at which materials change state -- think water changing to steam or ice, or in the present instance, water -- in its pure state an electrical insulator -- becoming a conductor.) The lowered boundary is sure to revise astronomers' calculations of the strength of the magnetic cores of gas-giant planets like Neptune. Because the planet's temperatures and pressures lie partly in the revised sector, its electrically conducting water probably contributes to its magnetic field, formerly thought to be generated only by the planet's core. The calculations agree with experimental measurements in research led by Peter Celliers of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory.

47 posted on 10/05/2006 10:46:26 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (If I had a nut allergy, I'd be outta here. https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson