Posted on 09/15/2005 5:22:11 AM PDT by ShelleyAa
Taking time to read the excellent Reuters expose concerning the bathroom break note passed by President Bush to Condoleezza Rice during a Security Council meeting at the United Nations, I was surprised to note that the full story was not given. How is it that a professional paper would not mention if it were a number one or number two that needed addressing? Don’t you agree as American citizens, this is important for us to know and we should demand they do their research? Let’s face it, with all the important issues of the day that need attention, this by far is one of the most.
When liberal media talks about the importance of protecting one’s privacy, they do not me a conservatives’ privacy, I guess.
Just so you know, it is the opinion of most that the note is either fake. It is clear that the words on the note are not written by the President, who always writes in cursive, and never in big block letters.
Either someone else passed him a note and he is responding, or someone faked the picture replacing some of the words with the "bathroom break" words.
Just another example of what low class trash the
lying leftist traitor DemoPiggie "mainstream" media
are.
I heard one of their talking phaluss heads, say, as a
side point, that working for decades in the News
:industry, that every single newsroom that he had
worked in, was not only overwhelmingly Democrats
but *all* had a disproportionate to the population,
representation of socialists, homosexuals, lesbians,
and anti-establishmentarianists....go figure...
"or someone faked the picture"
I demand a 9/11-type commission to get to the bottom of this!
/s
"When liberal media talks about the importance of protecting one’s privacy, they do not me a conservatives’ privacy, I guess."
The dim libs mean "Don't do as I do, do as I say" has been this way forever.
On the other hand, if the President wrote the note, it means that when Condoleezza says she knows him well she's not just whistlin' Dixie.
"Fake but accurate".
Tempest in a peepot
;o)
The purported note was from her to him. He was supposedly responding with a note below that. However, the note she allegedly wrote is not in her known handwriting while his seems to be. Looks gerryrigged to me.
It makes little difference. The quality of the "Mainstream Newsmedia" "journalism" is about the same as men's room graffiti.
I had not heard that comparison before, or at least I don't remember it. I think it great.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.