Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

The Nuclear Option: Or How Bill Frist Stopped Worrying and Learned to Love the Bomb.

 

1 posted on 09/18/2005 12:56:54 AM PDT by RWR8189
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: RWR8189

Alas, RINOs prevent nukes from being deployed.


2 posted on 09/18/2005 12:58:18 AM PDT by Mr. Mojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RWR8189

If the RATS are going to filibuster anyway, Dubya should go the whole nine yards and nominate Janice Rogers Brown.


4 posted on 09/18/2005 1:01:31 AM PDT by ABG(anybody but Gore) (Unleash Karl Rove!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RWR8189

Pick the fight. Give the Rats the big F bomb. ;-)


6 posted on 09/18/2005 1:02:41 AM PDT by Deetes (God Bless the Troops and their Families)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RWR8189

Searchlight Harry is going to need that light to get out of his dim liberalism.


7 posted on 09/18/2005 1:03:30 AM PDT by beyond the sea (William Jefferson Democrat Louisiana - doesn't everybody keep their cash in their freezer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RWR8189

Let me put this delicately...pound sand Harry.


9 posted on 09/18/2005 1:07:38 AM PDT by SoDak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RWR8189

I think I have a name the Democrats shouldn't *dare* filibuster if Bush were to nominate him. He's a white male Republican and yet he's a minority.

He's been on the Texas Supreme Court and is presently serving as the state's Attorney General. His name is Greg Abbott.

While Abbott is no better than many other qualified jurists Bush could pick, he has one advantage that could force the Dems to hold back their venom. He is confined to a wheelchair - partially paralyzed after a tree fell on him while exercising.

Are the Democrats going to allow themselves to be seen "beating up on a cripple" - particularly the first mobility-impaired American to be nominated to the Supreme Court? Surely, the ever-so-sensitive Democrats would rather lynch another black nominee than have to destroy a man already bound to a wheelchair.

Even if the Dems succeed in killing his nomination, they are going to lose more voters if they do, particularly women who instinctively have sympathy for those with physical limitations.

Unfortunately, I don't know enough about his positions on pro-life issues but, other than stem-cell research, the handicapped are often among the strongest pro-lifers because they realize how quickly the slippery slope of "quality of life" arguments falls down to their level when it comes to who gets to live or die.

It would be the sort of nomination that would so throw the liberals off guard that they would either overplay their hand opposing him or stand back because of the PR damage such attacks might cause.

It would once again show Bush outsmarting the Dems by thinking outside the box. While nominating Brown, Owen or an Hispanic creates problems for the Dems, they already have their opposition research done and will be loaded for bear as they were when these were previously nominated for appellate positions. Abbott will be somebody they'd have to scramble to find dirt on.


14 posted on 09/18/2005 1:41:40 AM PDT by Tall_Texan (RIP New Orleans 1718-2005)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RWR8189
Court Judge Priscilla Owen will be filibustered if President Bush names her to replace Justice Sandra Day O'Connor on the Supreme Court.

All the more the reason to name Janice Rogers Brown! Let them slit their own throats!

18 posted on 09/18/2005 2:47:49 AM PDT by Bommer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RWR8189
Surely George Bush is scared by now. Surely he'll exercise the Senatorially-mandated interpretation of the US Constitution now, and use the Senate's role of advice and consent to select the justice Reid wants.

Surely.

22 posted on 09/18/2005 3:27:10 AM PDT by GretchenM (Hooked on porn and hating it? Visit http://www.theophostic.com .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RWR8189
"Republican Senate strategists believe Attorney General Alberto Gonzales is the only possible Bush nominee to replace O'Connor who would not face a filibuster."

Which, in and of itself, is sufficient proof that Gonzales should NOT be nominated to the position.

24 posted on 09/18/2005 4:10:25 AM PDT by Wonder Warthog (The Hog of Steel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RWR8189

There is nothing else left for the rodents to do.


29 posted on 09/18/2005 5:07:08 AM PDT by jmaroneps37 (The quisling ratmedia: always eager to remind us of why we hate them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RWR8189

I for one don't give a flying rats butt if the filibuster, but make them DO a REAL filibuster, not the spineless Republican way where they let business continue but take no action on nominees.


33 posted on 09/18/2005 6:37:06 AM PDT by stockpirate (If you are a John Kerry fan check out my about me page, you'll toss your lunch.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RWR8189

They would filibuster Kermit the Freakin' Frog. Bring it on, you dirtbags!


35 posted on 09/18/2005 6:48:32 AM PDT by LS (CNN is the Amtrak of news)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RWR8189
Headline: Reid Warns of Filibuster Over Owen

"Go ahead Reid, you punk,... make my day!"

36 posted on 09/18/2005 6:54:48 AM PDT by Gritty ("Chuck Schumer has the shifty air of a mob accountant - Mark Steyn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RWR8189

Heck, if they'll (try) to filibuster Owen we should go with a better pick (one they'll hate even more) like:

Edith Jones
Janice Rogers Brown
Michael Luttig
Michael McConnell
Emilio Garza.


38 posted on 09/18/2005 6:59:01 AM PDT by NeoCaveman ("Government is not the solution, it is the problem" - Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RWR8189

These Republicans need to each grow a pair and start enjoying the advantages of majority. They were elected for a reason and it wasn't to just spend our money like drunken democrats. Get busy!


39 posted on 09/18/2005 6:59:46 AM PDT by muir_redwoods (Free Sirhan Sirhan, after all, the bastard who killed Mary Jo Kopechne is walking around free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RWR8189

NOMINATE MAURA CORRIGAN!!!


41 posted on 09/18/2005 9:16:19 AM PDT by Clintonfatigued (Jeanine Pirro for Senate, Hillary Clinton for Weight Watchers Spokeswoman)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RWR8189

Do the Dems want Bush to nominate another woman for SCOTUS or not? It shouldn't matter what her beliefs are, she's a woman, surely NOW should be supportive....


49 posted on 09/19/2005 12:02:29 AM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RWR8189

So make them filibuster her already. These are the pro-Hillary folks who, three years hence, will be sneering that the Republicans are "afraid of strong women." Let them explain that one away.


50 posted on 09/19/2005 12:07:31 AM PDT by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson