Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: gridlock
If this means 300 ft. of property has to be condemned on either side of the canal, I don't have a problem with that.

One thing I don't understand is why the canal is there in the first place. Apparently the neighborhoods where flooding began are a sufficient distance from Lake Pontchartrain. But then this safety margin is erased by having a canal go from the lake to a point where only a narrow levee protects the whole city.

16 posted on 10/04/2005 7:00:03 AM PDT by wideminded
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: wideminded
One thing I don't understand is why the canal is there in the first place.

Well, the Industrial Canal is there for navigational purposes. But the other canals seem to be for flood control. Water is pumped from the bottomland over the wall and it drains into the lake. Why this water could not be pumped through large concrete pipelines, I don't know.

17 posted on 10/04/2005 7:33:59 AM PDT by gridlock (You can be a hippie stoner peacenik, but the ROPers will still want you dead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: wideminded

Canals in low-lands are necessary for port operations and drainage. Ever been to Florida?


24 posted on 10/04/2005 10:31:21 AM PDT by Sunnyflorida
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson