Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 10/09/2005 3:28:32 PM PDT by Pukin Dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 241-252 next last
To: Pukin Dog
To quote from a favorite film of mine: "Thanks. I appreciate it. And welcome back to the fight. This time I know our side will win."
31 posted on 10/09/2005 3:40:26 PM PDT by decal (Mother Nature and Real Life are conservatives; the Progs have never figured this out.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pukin Dog
So, why not simply remove Specter from the committee? That would have been really bad PR

Well, at least there's one principle this WH won't back down from...

33 posted on 10/09/2005 3:41:36 PM PDT by streetpreacher (If at the end of the day, 100% of both sides are not angry with me, I've failed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pukin Dog
Luttig, McConnell, JRB, Owen, Alito, or anyone else you want to name, would have been defeated, and probably defeated in committee,

All the above have skeletons eh? Sitting on the bench must be pretty racy. Miers seems more likely to vote against Roe than some of the above. She has a visceral biblical hatred of abortion. But she will just slip through the traitorious Specter net eh? I don't know whom you are talking to, but it ain't Moses.

By the way, I viewed your opus as self therapy. My best advice is to write an opus, revise it, think about it, maybe discuss it with significant others, or professionals in the therapy field, and then hit the delete button.

When I go, there will be no opus. It will be like that guy in the Phantom of the Opera. The body will just fade away, quietly in the night, and all that will be left is the mask.

34 posted on 10/09/2005 3:41:41 PM PDT by Torie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pukin Dog
Careful Dog! Specter and the D's are looking for folks to subpoena who have inside information.
35 posted on 10/09/2005 3:41:47 PM PDT by Swampmarine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pukin Dog

Supporting her or not is irrelevant. She will be confirmed and she's certainly not going to withdraw or be withdrawn.

Only history will tell us if she was a good choice.


38 posted on 10/09/2005 3:42:42 PM PDT by Petronski (I love Cyborg!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pukin Dog

As you and/or Rumsfeld said, you go to war with the Senate you have, not the one you want....


39 posted on 10/09/2005 3:43:08 PM PDT by The Spirit Of Allegiance (SAVE THE BRAINFOREST! Boycott the RED Dead Tree Media & NUKE the DNC Class Action Temper Tantrum!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pukin Dog
Basically you are saying that the democrats are still in charge. I sadly say that I agree.

I respectfully disagree with the idea that Miers is the only one who could be confirmed. Owens and Brown are confirmable on the basis that they were the Federal Circuit posts. There is nothing that further disqualifies the from the USSC bench.

I suspect it is Brown who would withdraw her name if nominated. Rush noted the other day that she had personally told him that the confirmation process was grueling. The whole Roberts dog and pony show was simply the democrats showing these other potential candidates what they were wlling to do.

Thus Owens would be confirmable.
40 posted on 10/09/2005 3:43:13 PM PDT by kidd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pukin Dog
My insiders tell me, Harriet Miers is a homo-luvin baby-killin spawn of Satan. Maybe your insiders and mine ought together and hash it ought.

Bottom line is I trust Bush more than anyone with super secret inside information posting on a web forum, and that ain't saying much. Nice try though.

42 posted on 10/09/2005 3:43:21 PM PDT by Rightwing Conspiratr1 (Lock-n-load!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pukin Dog
You have confirmed what I has read elsewhere in the blogsphere; that the other candidates who would otherwise have not been filibustered had things in their background that would have made them unconfirmable.

And by extension one might speculate that they might also have been forced from the bench altogether.

43 posted on 10/09/2005 3:43:49 PM PDT by quidnunc (Omnis Gaul delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pukin Dog

Interesting rant. I'm still waiting for this Repulican Senate to get a collective spine and stop acting like the minority party. I still am opposed to the Miers nomination.

Viva la Reagan revolution. I want him back, he had balls.


44 posted on 10/09/2005 3:44:01 PM PDT by Lucretia Borgia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pukin Dog
No complaints from me for your reasonable decision to reconsider for the better good, and thanks for doing so.

This conservative infighting over Miers is wearing thin and only emboldens the rats.
45 posted on 10/09/2005 3:44:10 PM PDT by Ursus arctos horribilis ("It is better to die on your feet than to live on your knees!" Emiliano Zapata 1879-1919)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pukin Dog
I have tried in vain to make your exact point about how the Senate betrayed us, not Bush, which of course means we betrayed ourselves by electing gutless, spineless, cowards.

If the Senate will not back Bush, it is our fault

49 posted on 10/09/2005 3:45:10 PM PDT by JZoback ("There's a pony in here somewhere")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pukin Dog

Welcome to the light.


50 posted on 10/09/2005 3:45:26 PM PDT by pieces of time
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pukin Dog

Dog, this has been in the back of my mind ever since Pres. Bush said Meiers "was the best person I could find." I was willing to bet that many or all of the people we would have wanted (JRB, Luttig, etc.) had their reasons for not wanting to go thru the hell that the confirmation process has turned into.


52 posted on 10/09/2005 3:45:32 PM PDT by Mygirlsmom (This MESS is a PLACE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pukin Dog
I'm with you PD, this verifies my own private suspicions.

The republican senate is chock full of spineless wimps!

59 posted on 10/09/2005 3:47:08 PM PDT by Randy Larsen (Freedom is not America's gift to man, Freedom is GOD'S gift to mankind!....G.W.Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pukin Dog

I'd always known our misrepresentatives didn't have the cojones to get any of the others through. How many times did Frist say "we're getting close to the nuclear option" during the filibuster? There was no hope they'd ever do it then, and even less now that they let it slide.

When we congratulate ourselves for recruiting social liberals into the Republican fold, think about how weak the party has become as a result. Total wimps afraid of a few words. WORDS!!


61 posted on 10/09/2005 3:47:38 PM PDT by AmericanChef
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pukin Dog

I can't say this makes me feel any better.

I notice you don't say that "we" are responsible for Arlen Specter being in the Senate. No, that was personally engineered by Rove and Bush. Many of us strongly objected at the time. I also pointed out that as time passed, Specter would be less and less accountable to anyone but himself, and that the one to suffer would be Bush. Hell, Bush not only twisted arms to get Specter re-elected, but he probably wrecked Rick Santorum's re-election prospects in the process.

There are ways to make RINOs toe the line, and they don't depend entirely on the Republican leadership in the Senate. How many bills has Bush vetoed? How often has he disciplined dissenting RINOs by taking away their pork? How often has he punished his enemies when they got out of line? No wonder he can't control the party.


63 posted on 10/09/2005 3:48:18 PM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pukin Dog
"The primary thing that must be considered, is that the Congress can NEVER be put back in Democrat hands, for that would destroy all progress made up to now."

Ditto for the presidency.

The DemocRAT party gets most of its campaign contributions from those who hate America and all we stand for. When the RATS are able to get elected, they must come through for their base.

They know that the vast majority of the American people will reject leftist ideas at the ballot box, so the only way they can "come through" for their base and get the anti-American left's agenda enacted into law, is to install as many left-wing activist judges as possible. They must do an end-run around the constitutional legislative process, rule against the will of the people and impose that agenda on us.

The fact that they get most of their funding from the leftist extremist blame-America-first crowd - our avowed enemies - is THE reason why we must never allow DemocRATS to obtain political power either locally, statewide, or at the federal level. They never give up in their efforts to undermine our Constitution because they have to.

The Constitution stands in their way. bttt

12 posted on 10/09/2005 12:39:55 PM EDT by Matchett-PI

64 posted on 10/09/2005 3:48:28 PM PDT by Matchett-PI ( "History does not long entrust the care of freedom to the weak or the timid." -- Dwight Eisenhower)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pukin Dog
he did the very best he could do without destroying our momentum.

What momentum? We've spent the past 25 years fighting to get control of both the White House and the Congress at the same time so we could put in justices that wouldn't legislate from the bench, and now Bush acts like we are in the minority.

I guarantee you if the dems were in the same position of power that we are, the head of NARAL would have been their nominee.

66 posted on 10/09/2005 3:49:14 PM PDT by phil1750 (Love like you've never been hurt;Dance like nobody's watching;PRAY like it's your last prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pukin Dog
Not sure what kind of inside information you have but....

Our Democrat opponents have been quite busy, especially after John Roberts embarrassed them, searching for any information that would allow an open personal attack on a nominee. Sadly, many of the folks we wanted badly would have had their lives destroyed had they attempted confirmation to the bench, and wisely declined.

I wondered if this might be contributing to it. After the way they went after the Roberts family you can bet on the nominees families dirty laundry being spread out in public.

Miers has one big advantage over most other nominees. No family to be affected.

I still am waiting for the hearings to decide about her.

But one thing is clear, this attacking of nominees and their families has got to stop or no one will want to serve.

68 posted on 10/09/2005 3:49:36 PM PDT by Harmless Teddy Bear (Warning: Not a Romantic or hero worshiper. Attempts to tug at my heartstrings annoy me... and I bite)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 241-252 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson