Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Four reason adding sexual orientation to hate crimes will destroy America
Exton

Posted on 10/14/2005 1:52:02 AM PDT by Exton1

Adding sexual orientation to hate crimes will destroy America as we know it.

First it would put homosexuality above religious freedoms, a violation of the first amendment.

Second it would be giving special rights to a class of people, recognized only by there deviant behavior. It would be similar to saying that it will be a hate crime to call someone a criminal when they steal your car.

Third. The phrase "sexual orientation" is made up by homosexuals to try to make themselves look less filthy than they really are. The purpose of the phrase is to take the spotlight from what these perverts do, and put it on the notion that they are just poor, mistreated people, who simply are attracted to members of the same sex - as if they aren't engaging in activity forbidden by God Almighty. "Sexual orientation," as used today, has nothing to do with sexual activity (yeah, right), but only refers to who or what a particular person is attracted to. If you think that people of other "sexual orientations" are just fine, let's see what other "sexual orientations" you would necessarily have to accept as wholesome and pure. If you're not going to discriminate based on "sexual orientation", then you must not discriminate against any of the following. Bestiality, pedophile, necrophilia., exhibitionism, fetishism, frotteurism, masochism, sadism, transvestitism, voyeurism. If you discriminate against any of these, you're a hypocrite. These "sexual orientations" are generally known as "paraphilias", and are mental disorders - just like homosexuality used to be (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders Fourth Edition, American Psychiatric Association, 1994.)

Fourth, by putting sexual orientation into hate crimes you will be allowing an attack on children, which would go against our constitution that aims to protect the most helpless members of society. We will be sacrificing a child’s youth for the sexual stimulation of degenerate perverts. This cannot be allowed to happen.

For the children, for society discrimination adding sexual orientation to hate crimes must not be allowed to happen.


TOPICS: Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: agenda; bestiality; exhibitionism; fagtakeover; fetishism; frotteurism; gay; gayagenda; gaystoppo; homosexualagenda; homosexuals; masochism; necrophilia; pederasts; pedophile; perversion; pervert; pervertedmarriage; perverts; sadism; sex; sodomarriage; sodomites; sodomy; thoughtpolice; transgenderisim; transvestitism; voyeurism
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

1 posted on 10/14/2005 1:52:04 AM PDT by Exton1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Exton1

Do you have an article or news item to justify posting this rant?


2 posted on 10/14/2005 2:06:28 AM PDT by Misterioso
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Exton1; EdReform; backhoe; Yehuda; Clint N. Suhks; saradippity; stage left; Yakboy; ...
Homosexual Agenda Ping.

If you want on/off the ping list let me and little jeremiah know.

Free Republic homosexual agenda keyword search

3 posted on 10/14/2005 2:09:47 AM PDT by DirtyHarryY2K (http://soapboxharry.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Exton1
The phrase "sexual orientation" is made up by homosexuals to try to make themselves look less filthy than they really are. The purpose of the phrase is to take the spotlight from what these perverts do, and put it on the notion that they are just poor, mistreated people, who simply are attracted to members of the same sex . . .

The last thing the sodomites want people to know is what they really do behind closed doors. Years ago I read an article about this. It disgusted me thoroughly. Sodomites do not want to associate their nasty practices with the fact that the average age of death for male sodomites is 41, female sodomites, 45.

4 posted on 10/14/2005 2:10:32 AM PDT by itsinthebag
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Misterioso
Do you have an article or news item to justify posting this rant?

Click on the Free Republic homosexual agenda keyword search and read up...

5 posted on 10/14/2005 2:11:28 AM PDT by DirtyHarryY2K (http://soapboxharry.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Exton1
Your title is Four reason adding sexual orientation to hate crimes will destroy America, but you just list 4 reasons to hate homosexuals. While I am disgusted as the next guy at the behavior of sodomites I am far more fearful of the very idea of "hate crimes". Beating someone up is wrong. It doesn't make it more or less wrong if you beat them up because they are gay, Jewish, black, or Hispanic.
6 posted on 10/14/2005 2:22:04 AM PDT by Gator61
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gator61

You're absolutely right. We don't need hate crimes laws of any sort.


7 posted on 10/14/2005 2:28:56 AM PDT by Fresh Wind (Democrats are guilty of whatever they scream the loudest about.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Fresh Wind
You're absolutely right. We don't need hate crimes laws of any sort.

I agree. Burning down a church, synagogue, mosque, gay bar or abortion clinic should each have the same stiff penalty of a long term in prison.

8 posted on 10/14/2005 2:34:15 AM PDT by H. Paul Pressler IV
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

Bump!


9 posted on 10/14/2005 2:51:54 AM PDT by BlessedBeGod (Benedict XVI = Terminator IV)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Exton1

There is a good chance that such legislation would also negate laws against the various forms of incest...


10 posted on 10/14/2005 2:52:45 AM PDT by RedEyeJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Exton1
If you think that people of other "sexual orientations" are just fine, let's see what other "sexual orientations" you would necessarily have to accept as wholesome and pure.

Is it ok with you if the woman is on top, or are you in the camp that claims the missionary position is the only one that should be legal ?

11 posted on 10/14/2005 3:17:07 AM PDT by staytrue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Exton1

"PL-L-LEEE-EEE-EEASE DON'T DO IT!"

12 posted on 10/14/2005 3:47:55 AM PDT by Caipirabob (Democrats.. Socialists..Commies..Traitors...Who can tell the difference?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Exton1

What the heck is frotteurism?


13 posted on 10/14/2005 3:50:51 AM PDT by humblegunner (If you're gonna die, die with your boots on.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: H. Paul Pressler IV
Burning down a ... mosque

Mosques are military installations. They do not belong with the other examples you listed.

ML/NJ

14 posted on 10/14/2005 4:16:24 AM PDT by ml/nj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Misterioso

Do you for your reply?


15 posted on 10/14/2005 5:25:23 AM PDT by StonyBurk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Fresh Wind

Do agree-- when I was subject to the informal rules of the
old schoolyard .I had a reputation as the person anyone wanting a reputation as a fighter had to start with.
In my recollection of those days when such activity was
not genrally a police matter-- We often justified our
tests of steregnth and skill by the verbal taunt -name calling. And these jibes continued throughout the contest.
But then once a thing was decided ( and most often they stopped at or before first blood was drawn) the comatants
ended up better friends than they would have been otherwise. Hate Crimes laws will destroy what is left of
America-but the house has been divided longer than I have been alive. I disagree only in th epost that suggests the
four reasons given do not suggest destruction of America.
For when the First Amendment is subverted or rejected
then that fundamental law does suggest in it's demise a
destruction of America.


16 posted on 10/14/2005 5:34:29 AM PDT by StonyBurk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: humblegunner

frotteurism is when someone rubs up against another to gain sexual gratification (cop a feel). They make it seem as if it is unintentional when in fact it was on purpose.


17 posted on 10/14/2005 5:37:00 AM PDT by Khepera (Do not remove by penalty of law!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Khepera
"frotteurism is when someone rubs up against another to gain sexual gratification (cop a feel). They make it seem as if it is unintentional when in fact it was on purpose."

See also: New York City Subway System.

:(
18 posted on 10/14/2005 5:40:25 AM PDT by LIConFem (A fronte praecipitium, a tergo lupi.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: LIConFem

Exactly but I didn't want to mention it.


19 posted on 10/14/2005 6:03:10 AM PDT by Khepera (Do not remove by penalty of law!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: RedEyeJack

Not to mention pedophilia.


20 posted on 10/14/2005 6:08:07 AM PDT by TexanAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson