Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Pikamax
"I don't think it's appropriate or useful to look to foreign law in interpreting the provisions of our Constitution," Judge Alito said in response to questions from Senator Tom Coburn, Republican of Oklahoma, in the third day of the judge's confirmation hearings before the Senate Judiciary Committee.

"I think the Framers would be stunned by the idea that the Bill of Rights is to be interpreted by taking a poll of the countries of the world," Judge Alito said. "The purpose of the Bill of Rights was to give Americans rights that were recognized practically nowhere else in the world at the time. The Framers did not want Americans to have the rights of people in France or the rights of people in Russia or any of the other countries on the continent of Europe at the time; they wanted them to have the rights of Americans."

Standing up, applauding! Thank you, Judge Alito!

8 posted on 01/11/2006 7:17:36 PM PST by Alia ("Witness" by Whittaker Chambers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Coleus; Cacique
Referring to "foreign law" is as trendy on law school campuses as "Critical Race Theory."

Ever notice how the libs like to refer to "European law" but would never refer to Saudi law?

9 posted on 01/11/2006 7:20:36 PM PST by Clemenza (Smartest words ever written by a Communist: "Show me the way to the next Whiskey Bar")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson