Replies

<< This picture and others of the dead victims never made it on western news reports or sites; most likely a ploy to surpress the backlash against its terrorist ally, Pakistan. >>

You're very confused. Let me help you straighten yourself out a little.

That the murders of innocents is obscene is a given.

There a hundreds of thousands of "Western news reports or sites," every one of them autonomous and independent of all the others. "Western news reports or sites" is not an homogenius organism, entity or force.

In any case, none of the bastards have ever published pictures of the islamafascist atrocities perpetrated against America, either.

Their individual "ploys" are as numerous as are the "western news reports or sites." There is no single "ploy," let alone one to favor Pakistan. Most of the ignorant, semi-literate bastards who staff most of the "western news reports or sites" can't even spell "Pakistan" or find it on a map.

And even if they could spell Pakistan or locate it, the only way any of them would favor it was if he was sure it was our enemy and its potential to cause harm to us and to our allies would be enhanced by their favor.

Oh - and while I have your attention - how're you getting along with your islamanazi terrorist friends in Saudi Arabia these days? As well as ever, is it? And what about your Iranian mass-murderer pals? Things coming along nicely for you there, are they - and with the mad mullahs' nuclear armaments?

YOU are the one confused. So let ME straighten you out.

"Western news reports or sites" have a very good idea where Pakistan is and and about their importance as an ally. And for them INDIA was/is/and always will be the enemy and the culprit. The pathologically anti-Indian BBC is a classic example. It isnt that the Brits have no knowledge of India whatsoever after having ravaged India for two centuries. Its just that those dhimmis are every bit as much born liars as their Muslim counterpart they chose to befriend. For the last fifty years the Brits (and along with them the Americans) supported their Muslim allies in Kashmir. According to them it was always "Indian atrocities" on innocent Muslims. No wonder Hindu genocide never made it to western press (not a good thing to embarrass your favorite ally) . They encouraged/cheered/lauded every despotic dictators to carry out genocide of Indians/Hindus in Kashmir, Pakistan, Bangladesh and elsewhere. Nixon and his (blood thirsty) henchman Kissenger made it a cornerstone of their foreign policy to befriend every one of the most murderous-despotic regimes on this planet. Their press and media very much echoed the sentiments of the Western government.

Things were going so well for them until three things changed.

1. Rise of China's economic and military might to challenge the US.

2. Rise of India's economic and military might as a counter weight.

3. The Muslims turned the tables on the west. When the West least expected they were struck on their back on 9/11 (and on7/7). And suddenly the West realised they had one more enemy at their gates.

Terrorism was "third world problem" until one fine day the Muslims turned on them and struck their very own @ss. Now that the Muslims have set their @sses on fire their "chicken little" western governments are suckering for our support. No surprises their media have for the moment toned down the heavy anti-India rhetoric. They are now making India friendly noises after having slandered India for decades. Fact is, we need the West to fight terrorism as much as we need Bangladesh to give us nuclear technology. We dont need them, they need us.

Consider this:

One-third of the world's terrorist attacks takes place in India. India has lost 80,000 people to terrorism the largest anywhere in the world. Not one of the ever made it to the western press.

Fighting in Jammu and Kashmir was always seen by the west as a struggle for freedom but now i believe the outlook has changed slightly and the fighting is now seen as a war between islamic terrorists and India's desperate resolve to protect its citizens and its national intergrity and soverignity.But the world has a long way to go before it can condemn this war as a pakistan sponsered islamized proxy war.Unfortunately President George W Bush himself has spoken of the US pursuing tolerance and freedom in several contentious areas of the world, including Kashmir.
He vowed "we will pursue a world of tolerance and freedom. From Kosovo to Kashmir.(BUT THIS WAS BEFORE 9/11)
We are forced to get along well with our islamanazi "friend" primarily because we need their oil badly and because we dont want to be isolated.None of the world nations (that includes the USA an UK) will stand with us to condemn Saudi Arabia.