Beat Hillary? Won't work. Try garlic.
Posted on 02/13/2006 5:31:21 AM PST by az4vlad
Hitler's name recognition is pretty good too.
Let her run?
"How to Beat Hillary in 2008"
Well, first you need a really big stick...
By the way, this strategy works ANY time.
She's not spontaneous, she hates herself and she's humorless. Oh yeah, and she's not flexible. These are shortcomings that she can only hope to deal with the same way that she did in Arkansas. Fortunately for us, the world has moved forward and won't think of her as a poor woman being shouted at while she behaves abominably.
I always have tried to avoid hearing her speak but the other day I forced myself to listen. She really is hard on the ears. I can't even imagine her in a forum where she has to interact with an audience that might disagree with her.
How to beat her? Just let her run...she will beat herself.
Sock... Bar of soap... Mask...
Why wait until 2008?
I will vote for Condoleeza Rice for President if she was nominated.
Never send a clown to clean up Boot Hill.
mark
Should she run, she will lose because she will not be confronted. She will not go on face-to-face media, especially with anyone to the right of Lenin.
Should she dare it once, she would be turned into her normal screaming, shreiking, bitchy self. End of chase.
So, the only difference between Hillary and her husband is that he has charisma? It's pretty sad to think so many Americans are that shallow, but they consistently looked past or forgave that immoral scum bag. It's so difficult to even imagine her in the White House again, as president, rather than co-president. God help us.
Hillary doesn't have a prayer in 2008.
The liberals have one of two choices in the next presidential election:
1) Nominate a governor who is liberal, but can pass himself off as a "centrist" until he gets elected, right out of the Bill Clinton and Jimmy Carter playbook, or
2) Hope that the Republicans nominate a squishy "moderate", like McCain, Guiliani, or Rice, who can get elected and then destroy the party base, like Gerald Ford. This way, the Democrats can retake Congress in 2010, and start inventing new ways to tax us into prosperity.
Some in the mainstream media have already figured this out. Even Maureen Dowd has taken off her blinders.
She comes across as a mean and bitter woman. She lacks warmth or charm. Her speaking style is grating. I don't know why the Dems would put her on the chopping block. She really needs to give in to advisors and improve her oratory skills or she is toast in '08. I really think she is toast anyway.
The Dem field is pretty big right now. Daschle is building a war chest.
The Dems need to get all the bile and anger out of their system if they have a chance of becoming a serious party again, and that's what will happen in '08. They will not nominate a triangulator, "all things to all people" type like Hillary. They will nominate a red-meat, moonbat type instead. My pick for the nominee is Al Gore, who has been doing a masterful job of recasting himself as the canditate of the angry activists.
I always thought of her as the person behind the mask of Bill. He was the puppet that would go out and sing and dance for the people while she pulled the strings. The crotchety corporate exec who hires the friendly sales staff to push their product. I never thought for a minute that Bill had any power in their relationship. He was just the dancing monkey that would get a few bimbos as a reward.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.