How to Beat Hillary in 2008

Intellectual Conservative ^ | February 13, 2006 | Rachel Alexander

[HHKrepublican_2]

With Hillary as the headliner for the entire Democratic Slate, not only could\would we beat her easily, but Democrats would be slaughtered in the Congress\Senate Elections. Her campaign would be a debacle

RUN HILLARY RUN!

[Durus]

She is a strong supporter of the second amendment as written. That is a better indicator then your assumptions.

[MNJohnnie]

Guess they have not looked at Hillys negatives.

[MNJohnnie]

Curious why Condi's name keeps being thown out there. What part of "no" do the talking heads not understand?

[1Old Pro]

Let her run?

agreed

[US_MilitaryRules]

I get a mental picture of the photo with pelossi holding that whip!

[LilDarlin]

How to beat hitler-y in '08?

Simple?

Use a big stick....or a brick....either will do

[KarlInOhio]

A non-achieving political opportunist can attain great heights is today's dumbed-down culture. She or he can (through shrewdness) actually project the image of "brilliance", without ever having to demonstrate or prove it. The trick is to get others to do it. It requires a large malcontent body, an adoring, obsequious press, along with dysfunctional political sycophants who have abandonded any measure of self-respect in order to curry favor of someone who displays a ruthlessness that both frightens and fascinates them (a psychological aberration that can only bring harm to others, if it helps bring the charlatan to power).

Except for the ruthlessness we had that in 1992 and 1996. Fortunately for the nation, XXX-42 was more interested in getting some tail than in changing the nation. If he had been a leftist ideologue with a real desire to rule (like Hillary) he could have been a vastly greater danger to us as a free country than he was.

As for Bill Clinton's political beliefs, if Clinton had thought that Goldwater and Nixon supporters got more college girls in the sack that liberals, he would be a Republican to this day. His political "beliefs" were chosen to support his vanity and physical urges, rather than having his political beliefs as the core.

[DelphiUser]

I am so disappointed, I thought this would be a photo thread!!!

[WayneS]

All the "photo-shop" guys and gals must still be asleep.

[WayneS]

Yes, but what do we do in the event of a "Hitlery Clinton vs John McInsane" election. I might have to actually vote for Hitlery since I know what she stands for and I can just spend the next 4 years opposing everything she tries to do.

If McInsane becomes President there's no telling what might happen. HE doesn't even know what he stands for. I think he might have gotten Syphilis (sp?) in Thailand during the Vietnam conflict or something, and that he is entering its final stages.

When it comes down to it, though, I just don't think I could make my hand pull the lever for Hitlery even if there was a gun to my head. So, if it's a Clinton the Terrible vs. McCain race in 2008 I'll probably just "waste my vote" and go with whomever the Libertarians or Constitution Party put on the ballot.

[ncountylee]

The person in the United States who needs to be most afraid of Hillary running is....Bill.

Because the only way to guarantee a Hillary victory is if she runs as the "grieving" widow.

BINGO!

[DelphiUser]

>> All the "photo-shop" guys and gals must still be asleep.


You'd think they'd wake up for this...

< Grin >

[yoe]

There is something disturbing about her that most people can’t put their finger on. Those who observe Hillary regularly know what it is. As Carl Cannon in Washington Monthly put it, perhaps voters will realize that “her marriage is a sham, and…she’s an opportunist.” For Hillary, holding public office is not about principles – it is about status and power.

If you know anyone who can't define or put their finger on Hillary, send them this:

(the complete Hillary by Mia T)

[Mia T]

This woman is all wrong.

ON NAME RECOGNITION:

 

KORNBLUT:  And I would add to that.  It's 51 percent say definitely not.  Remember the margin that's we've been talking about in the last few presidential races, 51 percent is terrible, but all she would have to do is bump it by a few numbers, a few percentage points and be OK. 

[I can see why Pinch hired you, Anne. Your Alice-in-Wonderland illogic is quintessential New York Times.

With 100% name recognition and roughly 10% corruption recognition (thanks in no small measure to your rag), missus clinton has only one way to go. And it isn't up.]

HILLARY'S EXPOSED LEFT FLANK 'SCARES THE HORSES' (VIDEO)
(MISSUS CLINTON SUPPORTS ALITO FILIBUSTER)
by Mia T, 01.31.06

 

 

ON A WOMAN PRESIDENT:

 

It isn't that they can't see the solution. It is that they can't see the problem.

G. K. Chesterton

 

... While America appears not to be ready for a female president under any circumstances, the post-9/11 realities pose special problems for a female presidential candidate. Add to these the problems unique to missus clinton. The reviews make the mistake of focusing on the problems of the generic female presidential candidate running during ordinary times.

These are not ordinary times. America is waging the global War on Terror; the uncharted territory of asymmetric netherworlds is the battlefield; the enemy is brutal, subhuman; the threat of global conflagration is real.

Defeating the enemy isn't sufficient. For America to prevail, she must also defeat a retrograde, misogynous mindset. To successfully prosecute the War on Terror, it is essential that the collective patriarchal islamic culture perceives America as politically and militarily strong. Condi Rice excepted, this requirement presents an insurmountable hurdle for any female presidential candidate, and especially missus clinton, historically antimilitary--(an image, incidentally, that is only enhanced today by her clumsy, termagant parody of Thatcher), forever the pitiful victim, and, according to Dick Morris, "the biggest dove in the clinton administration."

It is ironic that had the clintons not failed utterly to fight terrorism... not failed to take bin Laden from Sudan... not failed repeatedly to decapitate a nascent, still stoppable al Qaeda... the generic female president as a construct would still be viable... missus clinton's obstacles would be limited largely to standard-issue clintonisms: corruption, abuse, malpractice, malfeasance, megalomania, rape and treason... and, in spite of Juanita Broaddrick, or perhaps because of her, Rod Lurie would be reduced to perversely hawking the "First Gentleman" instead of the "Commander-in-Chief."

Mia T, 10.02.05
HILLARY'S COMMANDER-IN-CHIEF PROBLEM
(see descriptor morphs)

'MAKE IT A RULE' -- PLACE YOUR ORDER FOR OSAMA WITH CLINTON and CO.
(HEAR HILLARY + BILL MAKE THEIR PITCH)


ON THE FICTIONALIZED MEMOIR (HEAR HILLARY IN SF)^{~PART TWO~}
THE (oops!) INADVERTENT ADMISSIONS OF HILLARY AND JANE IN SAN FRANCISCO


THE (oops!) INADVERTENT ADMISSIONS OF BILL + HILLARY CLINTON (HEAR HILLARY IN SF) ^{~PART ONE~}


'HIATUS' FOR HILLARY?


for the birds
(THE INCOMPETENCE OF HILLARY CLINTON)


HILLARY FLUNKED D.C. BAR EXAM
"the smartest woman in the world" sought less competitive venue


HILLARY!?? WHAT IS THIS MORIBUND LOSER DOING IN THE POLITICAL ARENA, ANYWAY? (bill's bud explains)

 

[RipSawyer]

So, the only difference between Hillary and her husband is that he has charisma? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

For me Bill's charisma is like the aids virus, I can't actually see it myself but I can witness the devastation in the lives of the victims.

[RipSawyer]

A non-achieving political opportunist can attain great heights is today's dumbed-down culture. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

With great reluctance I am forced to agree! Dumbed-down is a fact, when I listen to some of the opinions expressed by those under forty today I cringe. The ignorance of all things historical is amazing.

[pabianice]

When she speaks all I can think of is the teacher's pet, standing in class to exclaim, "Teacher! Teacher! Johnny just threw a spitball at Nancy! Punish him!"