Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Inside the Shooting at the Ranch
TIME ^ | 2/19/2006 | John Cloud

Posted on 02/19/2006 6:18:08 PM PST by wjersey

What really happened in the brushy South Texas wild that day? How one shot turned a genteel quail hunt into a political crisis?

The delicate and the dangerous meet in the ranch lands of South Texas. In the winter, quail gather in the soft gold of prairie sedge, but snakes, scorpions and wild-boar-like javelina lurk too. In 1999 a fourth-generation South Texas rancher named Tobin Armstrong testified before Congress that he sometimes found illegal immigrants dead of dehydration in the unforgiving brush of his 49,300-acre ranch. It was there that Vice President Dick Cheney, out with a hunting party that included Tobin's daughter Katharine, accidentally sprayed attorney Harry Whittington with birdshot. What took place in the hours before and after the Feb. 11 shooting is a largely mundane tale that became extraordinary when, for days, Cheney seemed unwilling to tell it. The Internet is still excreting rumors.

So, what did happen?

Gentility and blood sport are old friends, but the mix of the wealthy and the rustic at Armstrong Ranch that weekend was exceptional. Tobin's grandfather started the ranch on family land in 1882, after he won a $4,000 bounty for capturing outlaw John Wesley Hardin. The Vice President was hunting with not only his friend Whittington, who has advised Texas Governors and plays a monthly card game with the likes of a retired state supreme court justice, but also Pamela Pitzer Willeford, the ambassador to Switzerland. Tobin died in October, so his wife Anne Legendre Armstrong, a former ambassador to Britain and a longtime Cheney friend, played host. For all that, Armstrong Ranch is countrified rather than ostentatious. At the entrance is a utilitarian "bumper" gate, so named because you nudge it open with your vehicle. Guests usually stay in wooden ranch dwellings near the main house, which are furnished with antiques but few frills.

Katharine Armstrong initially told a Texas reporter that there had been "zero, zippo" drinking that Saturday. But Cheney later said on Fox News that he had had "a beer" at lunch. The meal had been served under an old oak, and the hunt--which had begun that morning--didn't resume until midafternoon. In addition to the grandees with their guns--Cheney's an elegant, Italian-made 28-gauge shotgun, Whittington's a 20-gauge--the party included several guides and dogs. Because of the breadth of the terrain, they got around in old jeeps and other vehicles. According to the local sheriff's report, it was about 5:30 p.m., as the sun was giving way to the gloaming, when the dogs located a covey of quail. Moments later, a guide named Oscar Medellin found another covey. When the dogs flushed the first covey, Whittington fired a lucky shot that hit two birds. As he went to find the downed birds, the report says, Cheney and Willeford moved toward Medellin's covey.

After searching for his birds for a bit, Whittington returned to the vehicle where Katharine Armstrong was. She "told him to go and shoot the second covey," the report says. Whittington walked toward Cheney and Willeford but, as Armstrong later told reporters, didn't announce his presence. "Your first responsibility is to let the other guy know where you are," says Texas A&M professor Dale Rollins, a quail-hunting expert. But Cheney too had a responsibility to know where Whittington was. "It's critical, especially with more than two hunters, to stay in a straight line," says Rollins. Cheney turned toward the setting sun to fire at a bird from the covey Medellin had discovered--and that was the shot that felled Whittington. The ambulance that always accompanies Cheney took his friend to a small hospital 42 miles north, and he was then flown to a big Corpus Christi medical center.

According to Cheney, Katharine Armstrong suggested--and he agreed--that she be the one to make the incident public. Cheney was traveling without a press aide, and anyway, the thinking was, she had witnessed the shooting. Armstrong is also a well-connected G.O.P. lobbyist, and she doubtless wanted to help shape the story. It was decided that she would approach Jaime Powell, a reporter she knew at the Corpus Christi Caller-Times. But why wait until the next morning to call? Cheney later said his first concern was ensuring that Whittington's children were notified about the accident and getting accurate information about his condition.

Cheney was in for a fitful evening; he was "just crushed," another guest told the New York Times. The paper says the hunting party somberly ate roast beef for dinner and got periodic reports from two guests who had gone to the hospitals along with Whittington's wife Mercedes. The Secret Service notified local authorities, and a traveling aide to the Vice President gave a heads-up to the White House Situation Room. Bush adviser Karl Rove called Armstrong between 8 p.m. and 9 p.m. to ask about Whittington--who, like Armstrong, is a friend of Rove's--and learned of Cheney's role in the accident.

At about 8 a.m. Sunday, a Cheney aide called strategist Mary Matalin, who regularly advises the Vice President. The aide read her a statement about the accident that Cheney had considered releasing before he decided to encourage Armstrong to go to the Caller-Times. But the statement "didn't say much of anything," Matalin says--not even that Cheney was the shooter. Matalin then spoke with a second aide and with Cheney's family and heard different versions of what had happened in the shooting. She decided no statement should be released amid the confusion. Matalin spoke with Cheney, and, she says, they agreed that "a fuller accounting, with an eyewitness," would be preferable.

So Armstrong finally phoned the paper, which posted the story on caller.com at 1:48 p.m., 20 hours after the shooting. It could have taken five minutes to get the story out. A communications official can tell a White House operator from anywhere on the planet, "I need to make a wire call," and within minutes, the operator will call back with wire reporters on the line, ready to flash the news around the world.

Wildlife officials say the most common cause of hunting accidents is a shooter's swinging on game outside the safe zone of fire, as Cheney did. But as generic as the incident was, there are some unanswered questions about that day. For instance, why hasn't the Secret Service released its report? And why hasn't the local sheriff released the text of the depositions his office conducted? There is also a small and geeky but persistent debate over whether Cheney might have been closer to Whittington than 30 yds., the figure in the sheriff's report. Some gun experts say from that distance, it would be unlikely that birdshot could penetrate Whittington's clothes and chest wall. Others agree with Jon Nordby, an analyst with Final Analysis Forensic of University Place, Wash., who says, "It is certainly possible, and I've seen it. I had a case where a BB went through a jacket at 90 ft. and through the pericardial sac and caused death."

Fortunately, that wasn't the result of this mishap. Three days after the shooting, Whittington, who turns 79 next month, experienced a minor heart attack caused by a piece of birdshot that lodged in or near his heart. But by Friday he was well enough to leave the hospital. A lifelong Republican who is also respected by Democrats for helping reform Texas' prison system, Whittington needled reporters as he left. "This past weekend encompassed all of us in a cloud of misfortune and sadness that is not easy to explain, especially to those who are not familiar with the great sport of quail hunting," he said. Whittington was dressed immaculately, as usual, but had bruises and pellet wounds where he had been shot. "Accidents," he said, "do and will happen."


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: armstrong; cheney; dementalillness; harrywhittington; johncloud; mikeallen; whittington; willeford
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-70 last
To: MikalD1
Actually, no, I haven't seen the silhouettes. Okaaay........you want us to believe VP Cheney is lying? Riiight... For what reason? You think the VP of the USA intentionally wanted to have a hunting accident? Give me a friggin break. You are nuts. And do nothing but fuel the Dims, which by the way, it sounds like you are......
61 posted on 02/19/2006 10:42:43 PM PST by Shortstop7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: 68skylark; Cicero; Caleb1411
Meanwhile, when outside-the-beltway America weighs in [today's St. Paul Pioneer Press:

What's the big deal?

A hunting accident every year was pretty much a given when I was a kid growing up in a small town. Every duck or pheasant season, it was a teenager or a youngster who got winged with buckshot or birdshot. Normally, the person who got shot had ignored property safety rules. Imagine that.
That is exactly what happened in Texas when Vice President Dick Cheney unfortunately shot a man in his party, who was in the wrong place, in the sun and in the line of fire, and willingly admitted it. So, what's the story? Cheney owns a gun and uses it for sport hunting, and the press corps was not immediately informed about the shooting. Spare me.
ED VIEHMAN
New Hope

All I heard on the news one day last week was about the "delay" in telling our illustrious media about the hunting accident involving Vice President Cheney. So what! Does anyone out there care?
The media should never have been informed about this incident except by the injured person. This is an outright assault on his right to privacy. No one should know who he is, where he is from, how bad he was injured, where he went for treatment, how old he is or his Social Security number. The release of this information should be up to him and no one else.
I guess the right to privacy only applies when the news media are trying to cover up and hide information that they don't want out in the open. Why don't those news reporters get a life?
HAROLD OLSON
Coon Rapids

62 posted on 02/20/2006 3:42:24 AM PST by rhema ("Break the conventions, keep the commandments." -- G. K. Chesterton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
The Internet is still excreting rumors.

Interesting choice of words. Seemingly indicating he thinks the Internet is full of excrement.

63 posted on 02/20/2006 3:47:56 AM PST by IamConservative (Who does not trust a man of principle? A man who has none.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: MikalD1
So, you admit the Ranger was there. Do you imagine he examined the body?

Hey, the man's not dead and he's off to the hospital!

In any case, when you are looking at a shot pattern on a body you are not also examining the shot that didn't hit the body.

End of story.

Even that creepy Gregory guy has apologized (sort of).

64 posted on 02/20/2006 5:52:33 AM PST by muawiyah (-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Beagle8U
Interesting that there are websites that compare and contrast the two, even the .28 caliber stuff.

They must all be mistaken eh?!

65 posted on 02/20/2006 5:54:51 AM PST by muawiyah (-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah
I think you are a lil mixed up, you need to do some research before you post much more on the subject. You are making yourself look foolish.

Thats not a personal attack, honest advice.
66 posted on 02/20/2006 6:24:50 AM PST by Beagle8U (An "Earth First" kinda guy ( when we finish logging here, we'll start on the other planets.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Darkwolf377
A beer. At lunch.

The larger question is, why wasn't the Washington press corp, and specifically, David Gregory, notified that Cheney was having a beer at lunch, at the time!!

67 posted on 02/20/2006 6:55:34 AM PST by TC Rider (The United States Constitution © 1791. All Rights Reserved.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: TC Rider

The question no one seems to be asking is, How many times did the VP go to the bathroom that day? Was he shooting up with heroin in there? And what magazines were present? I've heard rumors that The Nation was not among those sitting on top of the can. This needs a special counsel.


68 posted on 02/20/2006 8:59:28 AM PST by Darkwolf377
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah; Beagle8U
muawiyah wrote:

-- there are websites that compare and contrast the two, even the .28 caliber stuff.

They must all be mistaken eh?!

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

muawiyah previously wrote:

--- Now, regarding the shot pattern and how far away the victim was from the firearm, this was birdshot, and it was presumably NEW birdshot, made out of steel, not lead!
It doesn't go as far as lead. Still, it has superior penetration because it's sharper than lead birdshot. You can learn all about this on the internet BTW.
Lots of new stuff out there on the varying characteristics of the newer steel shot, and you'd best learn those differences before you kill yourself out in a field somewhere. I had no idea it was so different ~ turns out it's better than lead.

Cheney also used a .28 caliber barrel, not a .410, and the shot pattern would be a bit tighter. I gather he only likes to shoot one bird at a time!

Well, anyway, if you looked at the shot pattern shown on the 4 cut-outs on that form, it's consistent with steel birdshot patterns at about 30 yards as fired from a .28.

There are no BBs in this stuff.
-45-

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~



Beagle8U wrote:

I think you are a lil mixed up, you need to do some research before you post much more on the subject. You are making yourself look foolish.
Thats not a personal attack, honest advice.


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


Well put, 8u:

--- Muawiyah's misinformation is typical of the 'internet instant expert'.

Cheneys shotgun was 28 gauge, not ".28 caliber".

Steel shot does not have "superior penetration because it's sharper than lead birdshot".

The shot pattern would not "be a bit tighter" on a .410 vs a 28 gauge.

And to make a conclusion "from the shot pattern shown on the 4 cut-outs on that form,"
-- that they are -- " consistent with steel birdshot patterns at about 30 yards as fired from a .28" -- is sheer speculation.
69 posted on 02/20/2006 9:36:23 AM PST by tpaine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: tpaine
Excuse me ~ mispoke. Here's an explanation on the net: "Shotgun gauges are determined by the number of lead balls of a given diameter required to make one pound of that size ball. Thus 10 balls of 10 gauge diameter are required to make one pound of such balls, or 20 balls of 20 gauge diameter are required to make one pound, and so forth. This is the traditional, and very old, system. The actual (nominal) bore diameters of the various gauges are as follows: 10 gauge = .775 inch, 12 gauge = .729 inch, 16 gauge = .662 inch, 20 gauge = .615 inch, 28 gauge = .550 inch. The .410 is named for its nominal bore size, and is not a gauge at all."

No doubt these guys were using the very best ammunition ~

70 posted on 02/20/2006 11:19:12 AM PST by muawiyah (-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-70 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson