What would it take for you to decide what the correct interpratation is?
Even if one document alone does not constitute a 'smoking gun', piles upon piles upon piles surely has to count for something eh?
I honestly think the pile is growing so deep that even the most doubtful will soon have to admit that things are looking pretty bleak for ole Saddam and the anti Bush crowd.
Declared is the key my friend. Always has been since Saddam agreed to 687.....April 6 1991 IIRC.
what i conclude is not that important. i pretty much assume saddam had wmd, based on his behavior in the past, and based on the events leading up to the invasion. it would be hard for me to be un-convinced of this.
the more crucial issue, in my mind, is having enough evidence to convince the American public, in Nov. 2006 and in Nov. 2008, that he had these weapons.
if this document was captured from Iraqi intelligence, and if it refers to offensive chemical weapons, it could be extremely helpful.