One document is not likely to prove much, we will need lots of documents translated , then folks with good military knowledge going thru and doing some heavy work of correlation and cross-checking.
For many , what I am saying is pretty obvious, for others that clearly aren't up to speed on the topic we need to politiely inform them without slowing down those that have the skills needed to do the heavy lifting!
Just my two cents....
jveritas is getting a pretty heavy barrage of questions, seems to me.
"This document is a clear indication that Saddam never stopped his WMD program at least up to the year 2001 as the document show because there was still and active Chemical Platoon in Al Qadisia Air base. "
this is a quotation from the original post. there are a number of issues here, if we are talking about clear indication of wmd.
in any science, when a claim is made about evidence, it is considered to be reasonable to ask questions about the evidence.
if you don't establish the validity of the evidence, anybody can claim anything. then it just becomes political, with two groups arguing, but with no way to resolve the question.