Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: LurkingSince'98

Are you saying we cannot even discuss decisions of the Patent Office? Can we discuss decisions of the Supreme Court? What about the FEC? The FCC? The SEC?

This is a discussion board, and I don't think there are any rules against armchair quarterbacking. If there were, threads would be fairly empty.


28 posted on 03/31/2006 9:46:07 AM PST by evilC ([573]Tag Server Error, Tag not found)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]


To: evilC
you stated you didn't think "that what the patent described is really innovative concept."

It is not you that made the decision to grant the patent, it was the USPTO. Unless you have read the patent and can point out the obvious deficiencies, you're just guessing.

Obviously, if some judge is going to grant them $5 mil they were on to something.

Lurking'
30 posted on 03/31/2006 11:26:03 AM PST by LurkingSince'98
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

To: evilC
you stated you didn't think "that what the patent described is really innovative concept."

It is not you that made the decision to grant the patent, it was the USPTO. Unless you have read the patent and can point out the obvious deficiencies, you're just guessing.

Obviously, if some judge is going to grant them $5 mil they were on to something.

Lurking'
31 posted on 03/31/2006 11:26:07 AM PST by LurkingSince'98
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson