[jveritas]

Secret Nuclear Project in 2001 and 2002.

[jveritas]

PING

[Dog]

Keep plugging away Joseph...great work as always.

[Txsleuth]

Did you happen to watch the show 60 Minutes tonight??

They had on an ex CIA guy...that was adamant about the "fact" that Iraq NEVER tried to get uranium from Niger...and seemed equally adamant that there was no reason to believe that Saddam had any WMDs....when Bush was contemplating going to war.

[SittinYonder]

IraqDoc ping for eyespysomething who is putting a child to bed.

2001, 2002 Iraqi Memos: SECRET NUCLEAR PROJECT (Translation)

Release/Translation of Classified PreWar Docs ping. If you want to be added or removed to the ping list, please Freepmail me.

Please add the keyword prewardocs to any articles pertaining to this subject.

Operation Get The Truth Out

Operation Iraqi Freedom Documents

Documents from the Harmony Database

jveritas’s blog

Ray Robison’s blog

An Interview With a Citizen Translator and American Hero

[Bryan24]

Sir, you are truly doing a great service for our country.

Many thanks.

The truth of the matter is that we knew, by that I mean that common sense and intuition told us, that Saddam had not given up his WMD programs, because that was the only way he could be a force in the region. He is a megalomaniac. He has to have the power. The WMD programs would give him that power.

You are revealing, in writing, what we knew and what the Democrats deny out of their hatred of George Bush.

[jazusamo]

Another good find my FRiend. You are doing a fine job.


tonysnow@foxnews.com
Special@foxnews.com (Brit Hume)
Hannity@foxnews.com
Oreilly@foxnews.com
Studiob@foxnews.com (Shep Smith)
Hardball@msnbc.com
Imus@msnbc.com
Myword@foxnews.com (John Gibson)
Drudge@drudgereport.com
writemalkin@gmail.com
hhewitt@hughhewitt.com
rush@eibnet.com
Beltway@foxnews.com (Barnes & Kondracke)
Friends@foxnews.com
humanevents@humaneventsonline.com (Ann Coulter)
howiecarr@wrko.co
http://www.michaelmedved.com/askmike
http://intelligence.senate.gov/ (Senate Intelligence Committee)

[Calpernia]

This document CMPC-2004-000167 talks about a project that started in early 2001 by the Iraqi Atomic Energy Commission (IAEC) to use components from the previously destroyed TAMUZ (also known as OZIRAQ) Nuclear Reactor to build a Nuclear Simulator Reactor. The TAMUZ Nuclear Reactor was destroyed by an Israeli air attack in 1981. In September 2002, after almost a year and a half since the start of this Nuclear Project and when it became very clear to the Iraqi Regime that the UN inspectors were coming back to Iraq, a decision was made to stop this Nuclear Activity project. What is interesting in this document that the IAEC was warned by the Monitoring Directory within the IAEC that this Nuclear Project is prohibited by the UN resolutions however the IAEC went on with it until September 2002 only when the UN inspectors were on the verge of coming back to Iraq.

[Marine_Uncle]

Great work as usual J. A lot of folks probably are not aware, that when that flight of 8 F16's dropped their iron bombs on the dome of reactor I, (Tammuz I), the blast wave did not damage the much smaller reactor II (Tammuz II). Nor was any damage inflicted on the buildings within this walled off faciliteis that contained nuclear hot labs (facilities for the handling of radio isotopes), the fuel fabrication building south east of the main reactor building, machine shops which would have contained hardware and tooling for maintenance of the reactor facilities etc..
Mossad was pretty sure they had 26 pounds of highly enriched uranium was being stored in a special deep water tank to keep it from going "critical", prior to being installed into the fuel rods elements. We must remember, reactor II was on the verge of becoming active, so the Israelis took it out while the uranium was still in storage so that there would be no leaks to the neighoring area. Hell if the Muslims would have ever considered such are in an attack, to protect innocent Iraqi from radiation poisoning.
At any rate. That uranium was still around after the reactor was destroyed.
Just thought I would make these notes for Freepers to consider.
I get my info from the book BULLSEYE IRAQ which I have mentioned a number of times at this site. It's 1982 ISBN number is: 0-425-11259-4.
A very interesting account of the attack on that nuclear power plant.

[RaceBannon]

major bump

[Salem]

Iraq War documents Ping!

---

AMERICA AT WAR
At Salem the Soldier's Homepage ~
Honored member of FReeper Leapfrog's "Enemy of Islam" list.
Islam, a Religion of Peace®? Some links...  by backhoe
Mohammed, The Mad Poet Quoted....  by PsyOp
One FReeper On The Line  by SNOWFLAKE
The Clash of Ideologies - A Review

[justshutupandtakeit]

Shove it up the Treason Media's @$$ bump.

[Spacetrucker]

God bless you Joe - you are truly a national treasure. One thing I wonder sometimes; you have to be really getting under the skin of some of our "N.W.O.'ers" - has any hate mail been coming your way?

[Peach]

Well, lookie here. Saddam was actively working on his WMD program; nuclear no less. Good job, jveritas.

[avacado]

I wasn't sure what a Nuclear "Simulator" Reactor was so I looked it up.

http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/reg-guides/power-reactors/active/01-149/

Am I correct in understanding that what the Iraqis were building was just a mock up of an actual reactor to be used for training?

[prairiebreeze]

Lets see. First you uncovered about the "special" (chemical) weapons, now nuclear programs restarted. Evidence of Bio weapons are most certainly just around the corner. Along with terrorist training. The mosaic of evidence continues to form.

Unless you're a deaf, dumb and blind leftist who hates Bush more than you love your country and don't want to know the truth. And who doesn't have the sense that God gave a goat.

High fives, j.

[ASA Vet]

MI Ping

Subject: Iraq Nuclear Program
Source: Jveritas translation

[tellw]

When these documents were first coming out, ABC News was providing translations and posting them on the website. But in recent weeks, ABC seems to have ignored them.

[roaddog727]

More good stuff.

Keep it up.

[mjaneangels@aolcom]

Let me know if I am reading this correctly. It looks to me like Saddam re-started his nukes program in January of 2001, if the earliest date you show here is the beginning of it.

Is that what it is saying? If so, why restart in January of 2001?