Last thing this guy needs to be doing is chiding anyone for foreign policy decisions after the 79 revolution. He was one of the main people who forced the Shah to lay down arms and allow for the arrival of the Ayatollahs.
Bingo...this guy should take the blame, along with carter, for the terrorist mess we have to deal with today. The dims are WOEFULLY inept at foreign policy. If carter had left well enough alone, the Iranians might have some semblance of democracy today. They most certainly would have overthrown the ayatollahs back then, and kept along the path of westernization that the Shah had helped to foster.
The dnc spin machine must be scraping the bottom of the barrel since they can't find anyone current that the public will listen to on any issue. Didn't they trot out Ham Jordan only a few months ago on "Meet the Depressed"?
It's pretty sad that they have to go back 30 years to a complete out-of-touch carter water-carrier/mudslinger. Can anyone be more irrelevant?
A few observations.
1. HAMAS is on our official list of terrorist groups. Just because they manage to get themselves elected, we have to make nice with them and even send them US taxpayer money??? Zbig obviously has no clear understanding of the ultimate goals of the Jihadists. Does he really think HAMAS just wants to have a Palestinian homeland? Or even that HAMAS just wants to eliminate Israel? Does he even know what a caliphate is?
2. What does Zbig suggest we do with Iran? I hear criticism of the idea of using force or threatening to use force. Does Zbig think we should allow Iran to get nukes? I don't. I think the ultimate nightmare scenario is Iran with nukes. Worse than anything Zbig describes. Iran armed with nukes will have an umbrella under which to expand its terrorist campaigns and spread the Islamic revolution.
3. Zbig is a big wig at CSIS, the Center for Strategic and International Studies. They have received extensive funding from the Sauds and Zbig has been on their payroll from time to time. I wonder if he is more interested in US interests or his clients?
It's pretty obvious that Liberal DemocRATS hate President Bush. We all know that. I don't think it's necessary for their toadies in the Liberal MSM to do a story on EVERY ONE OF THEM. Geeeesh!
You love me, you really love me!
You, Brzezinski, and your patron Jimmy Carter are living, shining examples of why we can never again allow the national security of this nation to be again in the hands of the Democrats.
Join Us At Today's Iranian Alert Thread – The Most Underreported Story Of The Year!
"If you want on or off this Iran ping list, Freepmail DoctorZin”
He's mad about the defeat of his stupid strategy that led to a mess in the Balkans. His book "The Grand Chessboard" had a big influence on the Clinton cabal. He argued for a strategy of expanding NATO and the European Union as a means of maintaining and extending US "primacy" throughout the Eurasian continent. But Dubya's doctrine of unilateral preventive war and his administration's efforts to split the EU between "new" and "old" Europe have left this policy in tatters.
No suprise therefore that Brzezinski is sething as his policy are left in tatters. Well the Socialist Worker Party approves..that shoud be some consolation to this second rate schemer.
To read today’s thread click here.
Join Us At Today's Iranian Alert Thread – The Most Underreported Story Of The Year!
"If you want on or off this Iran ping list, Freepmail DoctorZin”