Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Burned out by butt-inskis
Boston Herald.com ^ | May 20, 2006 | Michael Siegel

Posted on 05/21/2006 4:00:08 AM PDT by SheLion

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-92 next last

1 posted on 05/21/2006 4:00:11 AM PDT by SheLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Radix; Just another Joe; Madame Dufarge; Cantiloper; metesky; Judith Anne; lockjaw02; Mears; CSM; ..

2 posted on 05/21/2006 4:00:37 AM PDT by SheLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SheLion
Despite all the absolute demands for tolerance, you are still allowed to hate Christians, smokers, meat eaters and fathers.
3 posted on 05/21/2006 4:09:19 AM PDT by Doctor Raoul (Liberals saying "We Support The Troops" is like OJ looking for the real killers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SheLion

As a person with severe Asthma, I appreciate the smokefree businesses but I agree that banning smoking in outdoor areas is wrong. My workplace is smokefree inside but there are outdoor smoking areas and I am free to avoid them. My asthma is triggered by cigarette smoke and my pulmonary specialist says that I could have a fatal attack if confined indoors where people are smoking.

It's my choice to never patronize businesses that allow smoking. I'm not talking about businesses that have smoking areas because those don't work. If there isn't a notice on the door that the establishment is smokefree, I don't go in. That is my choice. I would never consider supporting a law to force private businesses to ban smoking on their property.


4 posted on 05/21/2006 4:14:39 AM PDT by Melinda in TN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Doctor Raoul
Despite all the absolute demands for tolerance, you are still allowed to hate Christians, smokers, meat eaters and fathers.

*sigh* I see you let your NYT/Boston Globe subscription lapse again.

Those are GOOD Hates!

5 posted on 05/21/2006 4:19:06 AM PDT by Gorzaloon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SheLion
I fear that the anti-smoking movement is on the verge of running amok.

Oops! Too late...

6 posted on 05/21/2006 4:21:47 AM PDT by metesky ("Brethren, leave us go amongst them." Rev. Capt. Samuel Johnston Clayton - Ward Bond- The Searchers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SheLion
Now, finally, a topic I can get smoked about. I quit smoking cigarettes about 30 years ago but have been smoking cigars for about 4 months, one a day, good quality hand rolled Fuentes. My current favorite is Gran Reservo.
There is an emotional satisfaction in smoking that goes well beyond nicotine's addictive nature. Part of that satisfaction is akin to punching certain puritans in the nose. Another aspect is the pure enjoyment of a fine cigar.
There are lots of ways to kill oneself. Determining one's destiny should remain sacrosanct in a free society. There is nothing high minded or superior about those who condemn others for their personal choices. I would much rather work alongside the smokers I know than the prissy prudes who wrinkle their noses at a whiff of tobacco smoke. Anti-this-that-and-the-other-thing zealots must be made outcasts. Getting their noses out of joint by smoking a cigar has become a joyously serendipitous pastime.
7 posted on 05/21/2006 4:27:31 AM PDT by Lou Foxwell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SheLion
ASH, along with these employers, argues that these policies are appropriate because they will reduce the increased health care costs associated with smoking.

Maybe if there's enough of this, people will realize that letting your employer control your health insurance is a bad idea. Of course, many people still think government schools are a good idea, so maybe they won't connect the dots on this issue, either ...

8 posted on 05/21/2006 4:33:06 AM PDT by Tax-chick (Knights of Columbus martyrs of Mexico, pray for us! Viva Cristo Rey!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lou Foxwell
There is an emotional satisfaction in smoking that goes well beyond nicotine's addictive nature. Part of that satisfaction is akin to punching certain puritans in the nose.

LOL!

9 posted on 05/21/2006 4:36:27 AM PDT by Aquinasfan (When you find "Sola Scriptura" in the Bible, let me know)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Aquinasfan

I STILL REMEMBER THAT WHEN ALL THIS STARTED, BREATHING THE AIR IN MILAN WAS THE EQUIVALENT OF SMOKIONG 20 PACKS OF CIGS A DAY. (opps sorry about caps)


10 posted on 05/21/2006 4:44:39 AM PDT by ClaireSolt (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Doctor Raoul
Despite all the absolute demands for tolerance, you are still allowed to hate Christians, smokers, meat eaters and fathers.

You said a mouthful!!!  The general public has very little tolerance today for Christians, smokers, meat eaters AND fathers!  You are right!


11 posted on 05/21/2006 4:53:31 AM PDT by SheLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Melinda in TN
I would never consider supporting a law to force private businesses to ban smoking on their property.

And there is the answer!  It should be left up to the business owner and his patrons to have smoking or not.  NOT the government!

12 posted on 05/21/2006 4:55:22 AM PDT by SheLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Lou Foxwell
I would much rather work alongside the smokers I know than the prissy prudes who wrinkle their noses at a whiff of tobacco smoke. Anti-this-that-and-the-other-thing zealots must be made outcasts. Getting their noses out of joint by smoking a cigar has become a joyously serendipitous pastime.

heheh!  High Five!!!

13 posted on 05/21/2006 4:57:13 AM PDT by SheLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Tax-chick
Maybe if there's enough of this, people will realize that letting your employer control your health insurance is a bad idea

People don't like change. The only way to get them to accept an idea is to promise them more unfortunately.

14 posted on 05/21/2006 5:00:01 AM PDT by EVO X
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Lou Foxwell

Nothing more politically or socially disgusting than a prissy prude who sniffs her nose at smokers as she dismounts from her V8 powered SUV.


15 posted on 05/21/2006 5:07:14 AM PDT by muawiyah (-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Tax-chick

The hypocrisy remains since those businesses that have banned smoking have not cut their insurance costs and they cannot guarantee they will not go up.


16 posted on 05/21/2006 5:09:27 AM PDT by secret garden (Dubiety reigns here)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Tax-chick
Maybe if there's enough of this, people will realize that letting your employer control your health insurance is a bad idea. Of course, many people still think government schools are a good idea, so maybe they won't connect the dots on this issue, either ...

If smoking makes health care more costly then health care cost should be at their lowest historical rates since the 50's, since smoking has decreased per capita since then.

17 posted on 05/21/2006 5:09:53 AM PDT by SheLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Lou Foxwell

I love the smell of a good cigar or pipe but my condition (see post #4) doesn't allow me to sniff. LOL Some of my favorite childhood memories are of helping my grandfather roll his own Bugler cigarettes. Of course at that time, we didn't know why I was so sick when around the smoke.

I think it should be a personal choice and not a ban by the government. I mean, where does it stop? Things like that should be left up to the people, business owners and patrons.


18 posted on 05/21/2006 5:14:58 AM PDT by Melinda in TN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

Next time walk up to her and fart and some how smoke won't smell so bad tell her she has an option.


19 posted on 05/21/2006 5:16:28 AM PDT by Vaduz (and just think how clean the cities would become again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Tax-chick
If smoking makes health care more costly then health care cost should be at their lowest historical rates since the 50's, since smoking has decreased per capita since then.

I put that in bold so it would catch the eye.  But you know what I mean.  Smoking has reported to have dropped over the years, so blaming higher health care on smokers shouldn't be the problem anymore.

It's all the illegal aliens that our hospitals have to treat that is forcing us to have higher health care costs.

20 posted on 05/21/2006 5:21:41 AM PDT by SheLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-92 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson