Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Wen Ho Lee Gets $750,000 In Settlement Of Privacy Lawsuit
The Associated Press ^ | June 2, 2006 | AP

Posted on 06/02/2006 7:33:42 PM PDT by Westlander

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-58 next last
To: ROTB

I don't know about Jewel. Lee's treatment did upset the Asian-American (formerly just American) contingent in New Mexico. (Of course, the political ramifications were not to the Democrat's advantage.)


21 posted on 06/02/2006 9:09:46 PM PDT by Doctor Stochastic (Vegetabilisch = chaotisch ist der Charakter der Modernen. - Friedrich Schlegel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Doctor Stochastic
Classified material were his programs he wrote.

If you had any background or experience in a scientific environment you'd be able to see how the NY Times and the Clintonites feeding them took normal every day things and put them in an out of context light to look ominous.

Los Alamos had a normal academic culture.

22 posted on 06/02/2006 9:15:43 PM PDT by tallhappy (Juntos Podemos!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: tallhappy
Los Alamos had a normal academic culture.

And you know this, how?

23 posted on 06/02/2006 9:17:49 PM PDT by Doctor Stochastic (Vegetabilisch = chaotisch ist der Charakter der Modernen. - Friedrich Schlegel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: quantim; jpl; Shermy

Wen Ho Lee court briefing is below. Same lawyers that are representing Hatfill. Hatfill mentioned extensively in this brief.


http://www.harriswiltshire.com/harriswiltshire/backoffice/upload/documents/Brief_of_Amicus_Curiae_Hatfill_Support_Lee.pdf


24 posted on 06/02/2006 9:18:27 PM PDT by TrebleRebel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: TrebleRebel

Are not these the same lawyers representing Scooter Libby? They are certainly using the same strategy.


25 posted on 06/02/2006 9:21:24 PM PDT by Doctor Stochastic (Vegetabilisch = chaotisch ist der Charakter der Modernen. - Friedrich Schlegel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Doctor Stochastic

Yes, I'd like to know about this "academic culture" that allowed scientists working on super secret programs to take their work home with them? I could just as easily assert that it was strictly prohibited, but difficult to enforce if scientists were inclined to be dishonest. And that is the problem. If our super secret labs allow foreign nationals of even slightly questionable loyalty to work in them, then they ask for this kind of espionage.


26 posted on 06/02/2006 11:18:29 PM PDT by The Westerner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: The Westerner
"I believe he stole nuclear secrets for the Chicoms at our labs."

This is why he won. The news media told you this, even though there was no proof.

27 posted on 06/03/2006 5:39:27 AM PDT by norwaypinesavage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Comment #28 Removed by Moderator

To: dennisw; norwaypinesavage; tallhappy

Thanks dennisw, good article. Notra Trulock wrote a number of informative articles on this issue. It would behoove some of the deniers to look them up.


29 posted on 06/03/2006 6:45:47 AM PDT by Eagles6 (Dig deeper, more ammo.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Eagles6; dennisw
What's Notra doing now?

I don't trust Reno, Bill Richardson, Clintonites more than I believe Notra Trulock.

30 posted on 06/03/2006 9:36:33 AM PDT by tallhappy (Juntos Podemos!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: tallhappy

He confessed to taking classified nuclear secrets from the lab and they have never been recovered. What's so difficult to understand?


31 posted on 06/03/2006 10:00:34 AM PDT by Eagles6 (Dig deeper, more ammo.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Eagles6
It was a fine article that demonstrated exactly how this is smoke and sizzle.
32 posted on 06/03/2006 10:00:45 AM PDT by tallhappy (Juntos Podemos!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Eagles6
You sound like a broken record.

You just make assertions over and over that have no detail at all. And each assertion is an exact parroting of the assertion of one or more former Clinton official who singled him out and jailed him after it was made clear how much interaction and money Clinton was getting from actual Chinese communists from China who were visiting the White House and fundraisers etc...

What "classified nuclear secrets" did he take from the lab?

33 posted on 06/03/2006 10:07:22 AM PDT by tallhappy (Juntos Podemos!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: tallhappy
Posted: November 27, 2001
1:00 a.m. Eastern

By Paul Sperry
© 2001 WorldNetDaily.com

WASHINGTON -- Former nuclear scientist Wen Ho Lee has broken his plea agreement by failing to help FBI agents recover classified computer tapes he stole from Los Alamos National Laboratory....

But despite intensive debriefing by the FBI, Lee has not adequately explained why he copied the files to the tapes and what he did with the tapes. The tapes remain missing. Authorities don’t buy his innocent claim, first made on CBS' "60 Minutes," that he copied the information to back up his work, because numerous measures had been built into Los Alamos’ computing system to protect against file loss. Lab physicists, moreover, testified that there was no legitimate reason for one scientist to have made backups of the entire library of source codes, since they normally work on just one small piece at a time. Authorities also say Lee’s claim he tossed the missing tapes in a trash bin behind his office at Los Alamos didn’t check out. And why toss those, yet keep the others? Under the terms of his plea deal, Lee agreed to disclose such information

34 posted on 06/03/2006 10:29:50 AM PDT by The Westerner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: The Westerner
Lab physicists, moreover, testified that there was no legitimate reason for one scientist to have made backups of the entire library of source codes, since they normally work on just one small piece at a time.

Anyone who would accept such a coent obviously has never written a computer program or worked as a programmer in a large multi-server bureauacry.

That sentence is exactly my point about all sizzle and smoke -- it makes not sense and is meant only to fool.

35 posted on 06/03/2006 10:43:26 AM PDT by tallhappy (Juntos Podemos!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: The Westerner

Lee did go out of his way to get copies of these codes. He circumvented normal procedures many times. (He was also caught tailgating people into secure areas; one person goes in through the badge reader and another just trys to waltz through behind without being checked.) Theses two violations are sufficient for his firing.

Lee's lawyer (the same one Libby has and the same used by James Smith and Oliver North, one John Cline) wanted to ask about classified assets in open court. The government didn't wish to do that and cut a deal.


36 posted on 06/03/2006 10:46:46 AM PDT by Doctor Stochastic (Vegetabilisch = chaotisch ist der Charakter der Modernen. - Friedrich Schlegel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: The Westerner


Hey...everybody, we really never took National Security seriously...heh..heh...Hey Monica, where are ya'????
37 posted on 06/03/2006 10:49:07 AM PDT by knyteflyte3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: tallhappy
"In 1993 and 1994, Lee knowingly assembled 19 collections of files, called tape archive (TAR) files, containing Secret and Confidential Restricted Data relating to atomic weapon research, design, construction, and testing. Lee gathered and collected information from the secure, classified LANL computer system, moved it to an unsecure, "open" computer, and then later downloaded 17 of the 19 classified TAR files to nine portable computer tapes ."

"These files, which amounted to more than 806 megabytes, contained information that could'do vast damage to the national security.

""These codes and their associated data bases and the input file, combined with someone that knew how to use them, could, in my opinion, in the wrong hands, change the global strategic balance."

""They enable the possessor to design the only objects that could result in the military defeat of America's conventional forces ... They represent the gravest possible security risk to ... the supreme national interest."

http://www.fas.org/irp/congress/2000_rpt/specter.html http://www.nationalreview.com/interrogatory/interrogatory022603.asp http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=1138

38 posted on 06/03/2006 10:55:38 AM PDT by Eagles6 (Dig deeper, more ammo.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Eagles6
Exactly!!

This sounds so ominous what you quoted but all it amounts to is he copied his code (stuff he wrote over years and years) from the main unix server to his local computer or a novell account.

It is so inoccuous but presented as so ominous you know whomever is feeding this to stupid reporters is not doing it to provide accurate information.

39 posted on 06/03/2006 11:03:24 AM PDT by tallhappy (Juntos Podemos!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: azhenfud
They actually did the man wrong. They assumed someone with a "Chinese sounding" name would be spying for China or somehow would be less than loyal to the US of which he calls home.

Total bull****.

40 posted on 06/03/2006 11:47:50 AM PDT by Diddle E. Squat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-58 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson