Coulter's "Godless" Outrageous

6/4/06 | madstrider

[Madstrider]

According to a close friend who has recieved an advance copy of Ann Coulter's "Godless" says that this book is going to cause a firestorm of controversy. Keep in mind that this comes from a conservative journalist. Get some tidbits from Donkey Cons a website for my friend's own book. I can't wait to get my hands on this book but at least I know who the matyr of the church of liberalism is!!!

[Madstrider]

The link for the Donkey Cons blog on Godless is
http://donkeycons.blogspot.com/2006/06/godless-is-here-pray-for-ann.html

[Vision Thing]

this book is going to cause a firestorm of controversy

This is exactly what Coulter, her bankers, and her financial advisors want out of the book.

[durasell]

This is exactly what Coulter, her bankers, and her financial advisors want out of the book.




Uh, well, yeah. Writing books isn't her hobby.

[beyond the sea]

OUTRAGEOUS --- I love it.

We need some outrageousness very badly in this dying nation.

[DManA]

Apparently there's no embargo on "buzz".

[BullDog108]

You know the rules....

[Our man in washington]

I understand Coulter takes issue with evolution in this book.

That's unfortunate. The weight of evidence is ovewhelmingly on the side of evolution and I fear Ann will embarrass herself. But we shall see.

[BullDog108]

I a heartbeat.

[BullDog108]

In a heartbeat.

[null and void]

Thanks.

[The Lumster]

Apparently, she's in quite the bit of trouble in Florida where she lives for, get this, voter fraud. Yup. She knowingly voted in the wrong precinct. She could be headin to the big house for up to five years for this, plus all the fines

What color is the sky in liberal world? Are these people serious? Do they actually think any one is going to prison for voting in the wrong precinct?????

Sort of like one anti-war commentator recently who said Bush is looking for a reason to attack Iran (which is probably true) so that he can avoid impeachment which will surely bring conviction and a death sentence

The scary thing is these people are serious.

[BullDog108]

My pleasure.

[Madstrider]

In real science there have been countless occassions where it was thought that science had the answer only to find that they had been wrong. In this case, if science had the smoking gun there would be no debate.

[missnry]

That's a good one!!
There are so many holes in the evolutionary "theory".
Shouldn't you have had a "/sarcasm" at the end of your post?

[durasell]

I wasn't aware that there was a debate among credible scientists...

[org.whodat]

I understand Coulter takes issue with evolution in this book.

That's unfortunate. The weight of evidence is overwhelmingly on the side of evolution and I fear Ann will embarrass herself.

And how do you know what side she takes???

[Madstrider]

Oh, the voter fraud thing. Weren't they allowing people to vote in other precincts in Ohio so that people wouldn't be disenfranchised? Knowing Ann she did it in protest. And couldn't she take a clue from Rush's troubles and avoided Florida altogether.

[Madstrider]

It is a theory as opposed to a law which means that there is no fact of evolution. And the 'credible' scientists remark paints you as narrow minded. Only the entrenched evolutionists use such language because they've set themselves up to decide who is credible and who is not.