Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

ANN COULTER: THE GOOD, THE BAD AND THE UGLY (Coulter v. hillary clinton)
6.11.06 | Mia T

Posted on 06/11/2006 6:42:01 AM PDT by Mia T

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-42 next last

1 posted on 06/11/2006 6:42:25 AM PDT by Mia T
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Wolverine

ping


2 posted on 06/11/2006 6:44:47 AM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

Hillary, who looks more like "Ellen" every day, really should be asked to take the Monica pledge:

"I did not have sexual relations with ... that woman"


3 posted on 06/11/2006 6:45:12 AM PDT by Cringing Negativism Network (H.R.4437 > S.2611)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jla; WorkingClassFilth; Gail Wynand; Brian Allen; Lonesome in Massachussets; IVote2; Slyfox; ...

ping


4 posted on 06/11/2006 6:49:34 AM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

Ann 1,000,000+ copies ---- Libs 0


5 posted on 06/11/2006 6:52:22 AM PDT by bmwcyle (Only stupid people would vote for McCain, Warner, Hagle, Snowe, Graham, or any RINO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

The T-ster never stops. Bravo!


6 posted on 06/11/2006 6:53:51 AM PDT by gumboyaya
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bmwcyle

Great marketing, no doubt. ;)

But Ann did something even more important. She focused the world's attention on the clintons' rape of Juanita Broaddrick and on the Left's new McCarthyism.


7 posted on 06/11/2006 6:57:13 AM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: gumboyaya

thanx :)


8 posted on 06/11/2006 6:59:09 AM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

That post has to go on record as one of the longest in FR history!! Geeze...

But that being said - my ultimate political fantasy is for Hitlery and Coulter to square off in a well-run debate. I suspect that Hitlery would come across as fake and angry, while Coulter would beat Hitlery so bad with the FACTS that Hitlery would start a fist fight!

OF course, such a debate will never happen - Coulter has everything to gain (book sales, publicity), while Hitlery has nothing to gain and everything to loose - adn she knows it.


9 posted on 06/11/2006 7:00:49 AM PDT by TheBattman (Islam (and liberalism)- the cult of a Cancer on Society)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #10 Removed by Moderator

To: Mia T

Hillary will have to come out of her wall during her run. The DC Chapter will be there.


11 posted on 06/11/2006 7:02:55 AM PDT by bmwcyle (Only stupid people would vote for McCain, Warner, Hagle, Snowe, Graham, or any RINO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
What I noticed from my little corner in Georgia was that the Left, and their accompices in the DBM, were starting to go nuclear over Ann and her new book- then, they got real quiet.

I think they fear too much attention will be drawn to this:


In "Godless: The Church of Liberalism," HUMAN EVENTS legal affairs correspondent Ann Coulter lays out one of the most original and perceptive philosophies on the cult of liberalism.

As Coulter writes:

Finally, the Democrats hit on an ingenious strategy: They would choose only messengers whom we're not allowed to reply to. That’s why all Democratic spokesmen these days are sobbing, hysterical women. You can't respond to them because that would be questioning the authenticity of their suffering. Liberals haven't changed the message, just the messenger. All the most prominent liberal spokesmen are people with "absolute moral authority" -- Democrats with a dead husband, a dead child, a wife who works at the CIA, a war record, terminal illness, or as a last resort, being on a first-name basis with Nelson Mandela.
 
"Whenever someone like the Jersey Girls or Sheehan appears, I try to picture wives of the men on the Arizona (Dec 7, 1941) etc behaving that way...  You immediately see them for what they are, opportunists."


...while I've been aware of this dishonest and sleazy tactic for years, Ann has called attention to it on a national level.

12 posted on 06/11/2006 7:04:34 AM PDT by backhoe (Just an Old Keyboard Cowboy, Ridin' the Trakball into the Dawn of Information)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

MIA T. BUMP.


13 posted on 06/11/2006 7:19:15 AM PDT by E.G.C.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
Let's clear this up once and for all. The so-called "Jersey Girls" do not occupy some unassailable moral fortress because they were widowed by the events of 9/11. Nor does Cindy Sheehan enjoy critical immunity because she lost a son in Iraq.

The victims of 9/11 were the husbands of the Jersey Girls, not the women themselves. Those men died not because Osama bin Laden singled them out for execution, but on pure random chance. The offense committed on 9/11 wasn't MORE against the widows than anyone else; it was against America ... every ONE of us! That their husbands happened to be working in offices in the Trade Center that day does not endow them with any insulation from criticism.

They gave up the right to respectful silence when they voluntarily used their grief as a platform from which to criticize the administration. They are no longer private, mourning widows, but willing pawns in a partisan battle. As such, they open themselves up to the same level of criticism they bring on their opponents.

It is disingenuous and childish to hurl brickbats, then scamper off whining when one comes back at you.

Everything above is doubly true for Cindy Sheehan, whose son was a voluntary member of the Armed Services, and gave his life in a cause he believed in, even if his mother didn't.

What's "unseemly" here is the exploitation of these dupes by a conscienceless Left, and the implication that the mean-spirited Right is somehow at fault for responding in kind.

14 posted on 06/11/2006 7:27:01 AM PDT by IronJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

Nice accumulation here. It is a keeper.

Thanks!


15 posted on 06/11/2006 7:30:45 AM PDT by Radix (Stop domestic violence. Beat abroad.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IronJack

Very well stated!


16 posted on 06/11/2006 7:43:09 AM PDT by Deo volente
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

Comment #17 Removed by Moderator

To: Mia T
The New York Democrat and former first lady said she found it "unimaginable that anyone in the public eye could launch a vicious, mean-spirited attack....

Hitlery forgot to glance her mirror before this speech.

18 posted on 06/11/2006 7:56:55 AM PDT by Sic Luceat Lux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
she is turning off, at a minimum, the more milquetoasty subset of the undecideds.

And perhaps turning on the less milquetoasty subset of traditional Democrats?

19 posted on 06/11/2006 8:50:09 AM PDT by jla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

The Clinton's are endowed by their enablers with certain alienable rights...among them lies, perjury and the pursuit of power.

The fact is they will never reply to you Mia T, for that is part of their MO...deny, deflect, dismiss.

The fact that Ann dragged the beast into the marketplace of ideas and then beast-slapped her was a tremendous accomplishment.

Hooray to you Mia T.

Hooray to Ann Coulter!

Go Ann Go!


20 posted on 06/11/2006 8:57:06 AM PDT by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-42 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson