To: Mr. Lucky
Yeah, if Neil Armstrong were to verify this, it would have a lot more credibility.
12 posted on
07/25/2006 11:18:38 AM PDT by
wagglebee
("We are ready for the greatest achievements in the history of freedom." -- President Bush, 1/20/05)
To: wagglebee
Yeah, if Neil Armstrong were to verify this, it would have a lot more credibility.I'm still not sure if that would be good enough.
They are (and were) all friends.
The only other sources who could either verify (or deny) Buzz's claims are his fellow buddy astronauts.
30 posted on
07/25/2006 11:24:31 AM PDT by
Sonny M
("oderint dum metuant")
To: wagglebee
Not saying this UFO thing has any credibility, but Neil Armstrong doesn't talk about the mission. He just doesn't talk about it. Always wondered why...
60 posted on
07/25/2006 11:42:22 AM PDT by
HeadOn
(Life is hard. It's harder if you're stupid.)
To: wagglebee
Yeah, if Neil Armstrong were to verify this, it would have a lot more credibility.Or say a PHOTOGRAPH or two. This UFO report is like all of the UFO reports. They are pieces of paper with peoples opinions of what they say written on them. They are worthless without some physical evidence.
To: wagglebee
Yeah, if Neil Armstrong were to verify this, it would have a lot more credibility.Why? He wasn't there.
294 posted on
07/28/2006 9:14:46 PM PDT by
lonestar
(Me, too--Weinie)
To: wagglebee
...if Neil Armstrong were to verify this, it would have a lot more credibility. Agreed.
309 posted on
07/31/2006 8:27:12 AM PDT by
GOPJ
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson