[LdSentinal]

I guess all that's left is the Boston Globe and Herald.

[Clintonfatigued]

Barring an unexpected developement, Ned Lamonot is going to win the DemocRAT primary. The only question right now is whether Republicans can get a viable candidate on the ballot, and so far Alan Schlesinger refuses to withdraw.

[USNBandit]

The Times editorial was amazing. It read like a post from Kos.

[Brad from Tennessee]

I read the editorial endorsement. They didn't even make a decent argument. The Times is just a leftist political pamphlet. Thank God for the Internet.

[Irish Eyes]

.... while The New York Times backed his opponent Greenwich businessman Ned Lamont in the Democratic primary.

Tell me why I am not surprised.

[nutmeg]

Connecticut ping!

Please Freepmail me if you want on or off my infrequent Connecticut ping list.

[BlackRazor]

The funniest part of the NYT editorial was at the end, when they claim that Lamont "seems smart and moderate".

[SunkenCiv]

Throughout his Senate career, Mr. Lieberman has been faithful to the fundamental values that most Democrats associate with their party...This is a talent and temperament that is helpful to the Democrats in the minority but will be needed even more if there's a change in power in one or both houses of Congress or, in 2008, in the White House.

...however (the editors could have continued), the radical single party state advocates aren't interested in that because they believe they will retake the House and Senate in the 2006 elections, impeach the President, and impose an unelected Dhimmicrat strongman. Republicans and conservatives welcome such an irrational course of action.

[SunkenCiv]

A Senate Race in Connecticut [Endorsement]
N Y Times | July 30, 2006 | Editorial
Posted on 07/30/2006 2:57:39 PM EDT by Sabramerican
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1674703/posts