Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Iran's Mix-and-Match Air Force Still May Have Bite
Aviation Week & Space Technology ^ | 9/11/2006 | Doug Barrie & Andy Nativi

Posted on 09/11/2006 4:58:10 PM PDT by Paul Ross

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-57 next last

1 posted on 09/11/2006 4:58:13 PM PDT by Paul Ross
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: cva66snipe

Ping. FYI


2 posted on 09/11/2006 4:58:41 PM PDT by Paul Ross (We cannot be for lawful ordinances and for an alien conspiracy at one and the same moment.-Cicero)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paul Ross
And Iraq's Republican Guard is very formidable.
3 posted on 09/11/2006 5:00:28 PM PDT by Mr. Brightside
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paul Ross

Iran, meet the Raptor.


4 posted on 09/11/2006 5:01:09 PM PDT by msnimje (What part of-- "DEATH TO AMERICA" --do the Democrats not understand?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: msnimje

I know. Whats with this crap? The Raptor chews up F-15s and spits them out regularly. I think its several hundred to 0 in simulated dogfights.

And the F-15 is a jet that has a perfect score in combat!


5 posted on 09/11/2006 5:02:30 PM PDT by Crazieman (The Democratic Party: Culture of Treason)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Paul Ross

I can describe the Iranian Air Force in two words: Target Drones


6 posted on 09/11/2006 5:03:32 PM PDT by JOAT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Brightside
And Iraq's Republican Guard is very formidable.

The other day Natan Sharansky said the guys fighting Israel from Lebanon this summer were not as much Hezbollah as they were Iranian Republican Guard.

If true, that is very interesting especially since 25% of them were killed by a highly restrained IDF.
7 posted on 09/11/2006 5:03:55 PM PDT by msnimje (What part of-- "DEATH TO AMERICA" --do the Democrats not understand?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Paul Ross

It will certainly not hurt to take the air force seriously. There would also have to be substantial attention paid to anti-air installations. It might be over in a day, but it would be an active day.


8 posted on 09/11/2006 5:04:57 PM PDT by RightWhale (Repeal the law of the excluded middle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paul Ross

As has become apparent with Hezbollah, the regime in Tehran is willing to provide sophisticated weaponry to non-state actors and to sanction its use. Any attack by the U.S. or Israel, or indeed a coalition, would have to take into account increased activity on the part of Iranian proxies against both military and civil targets. These threats could range far beyond the Middle East.

Quite frankly, it would be better for the US and Isreal to
attack Iran now and then deal with these proxies as they expose themselves.

Is there a point to waiting till they become strong enough
to defeat us?


9 posted on 09/11/2006 5:05:30 PM PDT by tet68 ( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Crazieman

And that supposes an air-to-air battle.

I think it would be Cruise Missles, then Stealth Bombers, then we would clean up those aircraft that did not fly out of the country seeking asylum.

Then, it would be MOABs and lots of them (if it goes MY way)


10 posted on 09/11/2006 5:05:43 PM PDT by Paloma_55 (I may be a hateful bigot, but I still love you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Paul Ross

Iran is dead meat on a hook.


11 posted on 09/11/2006 5:05:56 PM PDT by spanalot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paloma_55

Cruise missiles.
Stealth bombers.
Arclight raids.
Tactical bombing.
MLRS.
155mm howitzers.
Apaches.
120mm mortars.
THEN the infantry and armor hit them.

They ain't got a chance in hell.


12 posted on 09/11/2006 5:10:07 PM PDT by Terabitten
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Terabitten

Cruise missiles.
Stealth bombers.
Arclight raids.
Tactical bombing.
MLRS.

I agree with these. After that, pamphlets telling the Iranian people that they had better get hauling because we are NOT going to finish the job for them.

And a followup note telling them that if the bad guys win the insurgency, we will come back and do it again.

I don't think we want to put boots on the ground in Iran.


13 posted on 09/11/2006 5:14:36 PM PDT by Paloma_55 (I may be a hateful bigot, but I still love you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Paul Ross

Don't forget the 1990 Iraqi "resupply" of MiG and Mirage aircraft when Saddam flew them to Iran at the start of Desert Storm.


14 posted on 09/11/2006 5:15:53 PM PDT by Yo-Yo (USAF, TAC, 12th AF, 366 TFW, 366 MG, 366 CRS, Mtn Home AFB, 1978-81)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paul Ross
Iran's Mix-and-Match Air Force Still May Have Bite

Don't make everyone LAUGH! Between the USAF and the IAF, the Iranian planes would have a shorter lifespan than a cockroach trying to cross Times Square during New Years Eve.

15 posted on 09/11/2006 5:42:36 PM PDT by AmericaUnited
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paul Ross; LadyX; Snow Bunny; marine86297; kellynla; tet68; MudPuppy; A.A. Cunningham; ...
A version of the Hawk surface-to-air missile--sometimes referred to as Sedjil--was also seen carried by one F-14. Again, the emergence of this program indicates that the air force was attempting to find a route to sustain a BVR weapons inventory for the F-14.

WHAT?????

LOL!!!!!!

16 posted on 09/11/2006 5:42:47 PM PDT by RaceBannon (Innocent until proven guilty: The Pendleton 8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Terabitten

But wait! What about Iran's 8 million man human wave? CANNON FODDER!


17 posted on 09/11/2006 5:46:42 PM PDT by HankReardon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Brightside

oh, please, I am laughing my head off at this, what they are calling modern and updated is so old and outdated, it will only work agains unarmed aircraft or civilian airliners


18 posted on 09/11/2006 5:47:19 PM PDT by RaceBannon (Innocent until proven guilty: The Pendleton 8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: JOAT

Drones aren't manned.

How about: Live Fire on Enemy Targets?

not that there's anything wrong with that....


19 posted on 09/11/2006 5:48:28 PM PDT by RaceBannon (Innocent until proven guilty: The Pendleton 8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: HankReardon

Cannon Fodder: What Cluster Bombs were made for......


20 posted on 09/11/2006 5:50:04 PM PDT by RaceBannon (Innocent until proven guilty: The Pendleton 8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-57 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson