'KILL BILL' (THE CLINTON-FOLEY NEXUS: A THEORY)

FoxNews, C-SPAN, bill clinton, hillary clinton | 10.05.06 | Mia T

[Mia T]

thanx :)

[Mia T]

thanx

[Mia T]

ping

[alrea]

With this cat out of the bag(closet) and all this information being exchanged and given new relevance, could other buried stories emerge before the election?

[2 Kool 2 Be 4-Gotten]

Interesting and provocative piece - ABC does "path to 9/11" and then ABC breaks the Foley emails.

Question: Do we yet know what was in Sandy Burglar's pants? I mean really know?

[Faith]

You come closer to understanding the Clinton psyche than anyone. It is absolutely frightening to consider the damage wrought by his presidency during those eight l-o-n-g years. And now we continue as a nation to be scuttled about as the Clintons frantically try to rewrite the past, while at the same time attempting to orchestrate events so that they can lay their claims to America's present and future.

Thank you, Mia T, for continuing to stand for the real truth.

[Texas Jack]

Once again, your usual outstanding job. Thanks for taking the time to put all of this together.

Your focus on the phrase "kill him" which was used repeatedly by clintoon, reminds me that he is a student of the infamous mass manipulator Tony Robbins. Mr. Robbins teaches NLP (Neuro Linguistic Programming), a technique that uses words to create impressions.

For example, in the Chris Wallace interview, clintoon repeatedly said, "I have never criticized the Bush administration in their handling of the was on terror." He then went on to criticize; do exactly what he said he never did.

The effect of this technique on the unsuspecting mind is that (1) clintoon never criticized Bush, so any criticism of him is unjustified, and (2) his criticism if factual.

I wonder how many nights Tony Robbins spent in the Lincoln bedroom while coaching der slick miester.

[bmwcyle]

The purple mafia will be after you. bttt

[bert]

......surely the perpetrators would have sprung it closer to Election Day.......

I can appreciate the potential tie to Clinton but doubt that is the motive.

Foleygate is but one of the series of exposes to which we will be subjected. Others will follow. The depth and coordination indicate a very high level of premeditation.

The goal is to capture the news of the day to preempt the good news emanating from the economy, the low gas prices, the soaring stock market and the consolidation of political factions in Iraq into a more cohesive government.

Then there is the October surprise. A good Rat induced scandal early on will allow a later Republican induced scandal to be labeled a 5 minute retribution make up.

The cause is not Clinton. The cause is the Rats who are at war with America.

Ostracize a Democrat at least once a day. Make them feel bad about themselves. Lower their self esteem. Megohm realize they are mostly dirt under the feet of decent Americans.

[Mia T]

Thanx :)

ABC does "path to 9/11" and then ABC breaks the Foley emails.--2 Kool 2 Be 4-Gotten

Sorta like penance?! ;)
Interesting point.

Question: Do we yet know what was in Sandy Burglar's pants? I mean really know?.--ibid.

It was probably the first thing of substance....

Did you catch Michael Scheuer's comment on how the 9/11 Commission refused to hear the testimony and publish the documents supporting his charges against clinton?

Is there anyone still in doubt about what Jamie Gorelick was doing on that commision... and who put her there??

We would have it backwards and miss the point entirely if we were to attribute The Gorelick Wall and the attendant metastasis of al Qaeda during the clintons' watch, (which, incidentally, was then in its incipient stage and stoppable), to the '60s liberal mindset.

Rampant '60s liberalism was not the underlying rationale for The Gorelick Wall.

Rather, The Gorelick Wall was the underlying rationale for--The Gorelick Wall was (insofar as '60s liberalism was the Wall's apparent impetus) a cynical cover for --the willful, methodical malpractice and malfeasance that was the product of the virulent clinton strain of rampant '60s liberalism.

While it is true that The Gorelick Wall was the convenient device of a cowardly self-serving president, The Wall's aiding and abetting of al Qaeda was largely incidental, (the pervasiveness of the clintons' Nobel-Peace-Prize calculus notwithstanding).

The Wall was engineered primarily to protect a corrupt self-serving president. The metastasis of al Qaeda and 9/11 were simply the cost of doing business, clinton-style.

Further confirmation that the Wall was cover for clinton corruption:

• Gorelick's failure to disclose the fact that she authored the memo that was the efficient cause of 911
  
• Gorelick's surreal presence on the 911 commission investigating Gorelick's Justice Department, a maneuver that effectively removes from the universe of witnesses a central witness, Gorelick, even as it uniquely positions a central player, Gorelick, to directly shape the commission's conclusions. (Is there any question which two people are responsible for Gorelick's insertion on the commission?)

Conversely, that it never occurred to anyone on the commission that Gorelick's flagrant conflict of interest renders her presence on the commission beyond farce calls into question the commission's judgment if not its integrity. Washington's mutual protection racket writ large, I suspect....

The Gorelick Wall is consistent with, and an international extension of, two essential acts committed in tandem, Filegate, the simultaneous empowering of the clintons and disemboweling of clinton adversaries, and the clinton Putsch, the firing and replacement of every U.S. attorney extant.

... Once the clintons' own U.S. attorneys were in place, once the opposition was disemboweled by the knowledge that their raw FBI files had been in the possession of the clintons, once domestic law enforcement was effectively blinded to foreign data by Gorelick's Wall, the clintons were free to methodically and seditiously and with impunity auction off America's security, sovereignty and economy to the highest foreign bidder.

(viewing movie requires Flash Player 6, available HERE)

Reverse Gorelick
by Mia T, 4.15.04
QUINN IN THE MORNING (ESSAY DISCUSSED)
(MP3, REAL, WINDOWS MEDIA, WINAMP)

COPYRIGHT MIA T 2005

 

[Mia T]

The Rs must stay focused. Like Bush.

Hammer home this simple message: To vote for a D, or to vote third party or sit it out... is to put your kids' lives and your country at grave risk....

We must not get distracted. We must not get discouraged. AND WE MUST NOT PLAY INTO THE CLINTONS' HAND.

[Mia T]

thx, Faith.

It should not go unnoticed that the clintons' rewrite of history places our country... and our children... in even greater peril. At least they are consistent.

[Brian Allen]

<< The timing of the Foley revelations is a bit odd. >>

It's not odd to those of us who've kept an eye and a listening watch on the Moscow/Peking/Cli'ton/Rich/Soros/Socialist International nexus.

The timing of the long held-in-reserve feckless faggot Foley filth bears that awful Medusa-like Mob's hallmark but especially that of its immediate financier. These liberal-activist kids were Gorgon Soros staged stooges and his Servers' almost certainly saved and stored the stooges' chat-room and email records for likely daily release between now and election day.

The gang that gave Gerry Studds a mild censure for taking a 17-year-old page to Portugal and actually buggering the poor little bastard, greeted Studds his return to the House with three standing ovations, let Barney Fwank off completely when that perverted piece of it's "room mate" took Barney, according to Barney, "for a sucker" and ran a call-sodomite racket out of Barney's DC office and house -- and actually worships the world's most prominent ever serial sodomist -- would make the already run out of town on a rail, (by Republicans) Foley's turning out to have after all been but another closeted "Democrat," a reason to give it control of the Congress.

Fat hope, George.

(Great stuff, Mia. Thank you)

[Mia T]

And it wouldn't hurt if we put them on the defensive in other ways, too. As someone who earned her stripes on the streets of New York, I'd like to see a little street fighter here.

One thing to remember, though. In the privacy of the voting booth, with the lives of our children in the balance, even a few of the most radicalized crazies won't be able to pull that wobbly lever on the left.

We must keep hammering away: The Left is gonna get us killed.

The Left's Fatally Flawed "Animal Farm" Mentality
(Why America Must NEVER AGAIN Elect a Democrat President)
by Mia T, 6.04.04

The Bush Doctine is built on two pillars, one -- that the United States must maintain its absolute military superiority in every part of the world, and second -- that the United States has the right for preemptive action.

Now, both these propositions, taken on their own, are quite valid propositions, but if you put them together, they establish two kinds of sovereignty in the world, the sovereignty of the United States, which is inviolate, not subject to any international constraints, and the rest of the world, which is subject to the Bush Doctrine.

To me, it is reminiscent to [sic] George Orwell's "Animal Farm," that "All animals are created equal, but some animals are more equal than others."

George Soros

eorge Soros could not have more clearly enunciated the lethal danger that he and John Kerry and the clintons and the rest of his leftist cabal pose for America.

Yesterday, at the "progressive," i.e., ultra-extremist left-wing liberal, "Take Back America" confab, Mr. Soros confirmed the obvious: 9/11 was dispositive for the Dems; that is, 9/11 accelerated what eight years of the clintons had set into motion, namely, the demise of a Democratic party that is increasingly irrelevant, unflinchingly corrupt, unwaveringly self-serving, chronically moribund and above all, lethally, seditiously dangerous.

"All animals are created equal, but some animals are more equal than others."

Apparently missing the irony, George Soros chastised America with these words even as he was trying his $25,000,000, 527-end-run damnedest to render himself "more equal than others" in order to foist his radical, paranoic, deadly dementia on an entire nation.

"Animal Farm" is George Orwell's satirical allegory of the Russian Revolution; but it could just as easily be the story of the Democratic Party of today, with the

Kennedy-Pelosi-Gore-clinton (either--"one for the price of two," I say) -Sulzberger-Soros-Moore construct

its porcine manifestation.

SOROS TSURIS

Soros' little speech reveals everything we need to know about the Left, to wit:

• its naivete about the War on Terror,
• its preference for demagoguery over rational argument, and ideology and reacquisition of power over national security,
• its mindset, which is inextricably bound to its failed, tortuous, reckless schemes, relics of a different time, a different war and a different enemy.

Soros is correct when he states that each of the two pillars of the Bush Doctine--the United States maintenance of absolute military superiority and the United States right of preemptive action--are "valid propositions" [in a post-9/11 world].

But when he proceeds from there to argue that the validity of each of these two [essential] pillars is somehow nullified by the resultant unequalled power that these two pillars, when taken together, vest in the United States, rational thought and national-security primacy give way to dogmatic Leftist neo-neoliberal ideology.

 

What is, in fact, "inviolate" here is the neo-neoliberal doctrine of U.S. sovereignty, which states simply that there must be none, that we must yield our sovereignty to the United Nations. Because this Leftist tenet is inviolate, and because it is the antithesis of the concept of U.S. sovereignty enunciated by the Bush Doctrine and the concept of U.S. sovereignty required by the War on Terror, rabid Leftists like Soros conclude that we must trash the latter two inconvenient concepts--even if critical to the survival of our country.

It is precisely here where Soros and the Left fail utterly to understand the War on Terror. They cannot see beyond their own ideology and lust for power. They have become a danger to this country no less lethal than the terrorists they aid and abet.

 

I think this administration has the right strategic vision and has taken many of the steps needed to get that long-term strategy rolling.

Where I give them the failing grade is in explaining that vision to the American public and the world. Key example: this White House enshrines preemptive war in the latest National Security Strategy and that scares the hell out of a lot of Americans, not to mention our allies. Why? This administration fails to distinguish sufficiently under what conditions that strategy makes reasonable sense.

My point is this: when you are explicit about the world being divided into globalization's Core and Gap, you can distinguish between the different security rule sets at work in each.

Nothing has changed about strategic deterrence or the concept of mutual-assured destruction (or MAD) within the Core, so fears about preemptive wars triggering World War III are misplaced.

When this administration talks about preemption, they're talking strictly about the Gap - not the Core. The strategic stability that defines the Core is not altered one whit by this new strategy, because preemption is all about striking first against actors or states you believe - quite reasonably - are undeterrable in the normal sense.

Thomas P.M. Barnett
The Pentagon's New Map
NB: Dr. Barnett is a lifelong DEMOCRAT

I'm a single-issue voter, as I guess must have become apparent.

I'm not a Republican. I'm not a conservative. I'm not a very great admirer of the president in many ways, but I think that my condition is... that this is an administration that wakes up every morning wondering how to make life hard for the forces of Jihad and how to make as hard as possible an unapologetic defense of civilization against this kind of barbarism... and though the Bush administration has been rife with disappointment on this and incompetent, I nonetheless feel that they have some sense of that spirit.

I don't get that... I don't get that feeling from anyone who even sought the Democratic nomination.

I would [therefore] have to vote for the reelection of President Bush.

Christopher Hitchens
Washington Journal, 6.01.04
C-SPAN

COPYRIGHT MIA T 2006

 

December 7, 1941+64

AN OPEN LETTER TO TIM ROBBINS, DAVID GEFFEN, CHRIS MATTHEWS, MAUREEN DOWD + JEANINE PIRRO

RE: a not-so-modest proposal concerning hillary clinton

Dear Concerned Americans,

Hillary Clinton's revisionist tome notwithstanding, 'living history' begets a certain symmetry. It is in that light that I make this not-so-modest proposal on this day, exactly 64 years after the attack on Pearl Harbor.

The context of our concern today--regardless of political affiliation--is Iraq and The War on Terror, but the larger fear is that our democracy may not survive.

We have the requisite machines, power and know-how to defeat the enemy in Iraq and elsewhere, but do we have the will?

In particular, do we have the will to identify and defeat the enemy in our midst?

Answerable to no one, heir apparent in her own mind, self-serving in the extreme, Hillary Clinton incarnates this insidious new threat to our survival.

What we decide to do about Missus Clinton will tell us much about what awaits us in these perilous new times.

COMPLETE LETTER

December 7, 1941+64
Mia T
AN OPEN LETTER TO TIM ROBBINS, DAVID GEFFEN, CHRIS MATTHEWS, MAUREEN DOWD + JEANINE PIRRO
RE: a not-so-modest proposal concerning hillary clinton


COPYRIGHT MIA T 2005

[Mia T]

Simultaneous Soros! (pronounced 'tsuris')
Virtual synchronicity.
In real time.
;)

[HarleyLady27]

Your right on again Mia T. Great info.... did you run across this:

http://www.progressivestrategies.net/introduction/partners.asp

[Mia T]

A strong clinton connection.... Thanx :)

[Mia T]

;)

[bmwcyle]

This is a rebuilt Clinton War Room action. The DEMS can't go to the bathroom with Bill and Hill telling them when and how.

[Mia T]

... and, therefore--to stick with your metaphor-- no one wants to flush them down the toilet more than the Ds. It would be naive to think there aren't multiple coups in the works.