Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Filmmaker captures toll road opposition
San Antonio Express-News ^ | October 6, 2006 | Patrick Driscoll

Posted on 10/07/2006 5:51:18 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks

The more William Molina heard about toll road plans, the more outraged he got, until finally he picked up his camera and did what he does best.

Molina spent the past several months shooting more than 40 hours of footage at public meetings in San Antonio and nearby towns, talked to activists, tried to talk to toll road advocates and spliced together a film documenting what he says is a nexus of tremendous change.

"I just wanted to capture history," the veteran filmmaker said. "One day we're going to look back at this and say, how did this happen."

"Truth Be Tolled," which debuted last week and is available for free showings, offers Molina's take on why this is happening, but mostly it's a series of people from all walks of life, shown up close to reveal every twitch of emotion as they voice fear, anger and confusion.

"The most powerful thing about the film were the individual voices," said Char Miller, director of urban studies at Trinity University, who sponsored a screening there Thursday.

The documentary, about and hour and 45 minutes long, treads quickly through massive state tolling laws passed in recent years, the new policies to toll every new highway lane possible with the help of private companies that would reap profits in return.

Now toll roads are planned in cities around Texas, including more than 70 miles in San Antonio. And work is under way to develop the Trans-Texas Corridor, a 4,000-mile network of toll lanes, railways and utility lines in swaths up to a quarter-mile wide through rural areas.

State officials say that to solve traffic congestion it's better to use tolls rather than raise gas taxes to build more roads and complete them faster.

In the film, activists and elected officials bucking the shift to tolling said government has simply figured out a way to squeeze lots of money out of motorists, and they point out that traffic congestion is needed on free roads to make tollways profitable.

In public meetings throughout the state this summer, most speakers opposed toll plans.

"These are real people dealing with real issues, and the film just carries out their voices," Molina said.

Molina, a Trinity University graduate who spent 15 years shooting movies and television shows in Hollywood and has done films for the Discovery and History channels, said he tried to interview officials with several agencies as well as elected leaders who favor tolls.

None agreed, he said.

"From what he was giving me, he already had his answers," Texas Department of Transportation spokeswoman Gaby Garcia explained. "He wasn't going to have a fair discussion or a balanced discussion on the issues."

Trinity students Fletcher Rhoads and Emily Bower said the film tweaked their interest.

"It was more emotionally driven," Bower said.

"Which is fine," Rhoads said.

"But," Bower added, "I feel like I need to do research on my own to form my own opinion."

To find out more about the documentary and where it's being shown, go to the Web at TruthBeTolled.com.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: carolestrayhorn; contributions; cuespookymusic; donations; elections; goodhair; govgoodhair; grandma; onetoughgrandma; politics; rickperry; salcostello; texas; tollroads; transtexascorridor; truthbetolled; ttc; ttc35; tx; txdot; williammolina
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-77 next last
Strayhorn camp lends support to Perry-bashing groups

Comptroller says she's proud to have groups' support.

By Jason Embry

AMERICAN-STATESMAN STAFF

Friday, October 06, 2006

Carole Keeton Strayhorn's campaign sent $25,000 in the last year to two groups that are no friends of Gov. Rick Perry, including an anti-toll-road committee that weighs in on Austin-area races, the governor's campaign said Thursday.

Guilty as charged, Strayhorn responded.

"Carole Keeton Strayhorn is proud to have the support of organizations fighting this governor's tolls across Texas, and she is proud to lend support to those organizations," said Mark Sanders, a spokesman for the independent gubernatorial candidate.

Strayhorn's campaign gave the People for Efficient Transportation committee $5,000 in February and another $5,000 in April. The committee, founded by anti-toll activist Sal Costello, runs a Web site that takes aim at, among other toll projects, the Trans-Texas Corridor. The corridor is Perry's vision for a wide swath of rights of way for toll roads, rail lines and pipelines running parallel to the state's major highways.

Strayhorn "is trying to wash her fingerprints off these negative attacks by moving campaign money through third-party front groups," said Perry spokesman Robert Black.

But Strayhorn hardly needs a front. While Costello's group takes some colorful shots at Perry, any Strayhorn speech drips with attacks on his record on taxes, education and transportation.

Costello said he is not paid by his political committee, and Strayhorn does not direct its operations. The group has spent much of its money this year to oust Travis County Commissioner Karen Sonleitner and former West Lake Hills Mayor Dwight Thompson.

Little is out of bounds for Costello's Web site, which not only accuses public officials of corruption and fraud in their business ties but sometimes divulges their cell phone numbers and attacks their personal lives.

Strayhorn's campaign also gave Independent Texans $15,000 in the last year. The group promoted protests of Perry's transportation plans in counties around the state last weekend and touts a new documentary highlighting opposition to the corridor.

Black noted that the newsletter Capitol Inside reported last month that the Strayhorn campaign denied rumors it wanted to launch a third-party attack against Perry. But that story came months after Strayhorn's contributions to the two anti-toll groups and amid rumors that she was looking to form a group on the scale of Swift Boat Veterans for Truth, which attacked Democratic presidential nominee John Kerry in 2004.


Letter: Tollway is deal-breaker

1 posted on 10/07/2006 5:51:23 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: TxDOT; 1066AD; 185JHP; Abcdefg; Adrastus; Alamo-Girl; antivenom; AprilfromTexas; B-Chan; barkeep; ..

Trans-Texas Corridor PING!


2 posted on 10/07/2006 5:52:53 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Hugo Chavez is the Devil! The podium still smells of sulfur...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
State officials say that to solve traffic congestion it's better to use tolls rather than raise gas taxes to build more roads and complete them faster.

That makes sense to me.

Every so often I have occasion to drive into Mexico. On the way back, I have the choice of taking the "free" bridge or the toll bridge. I always take the toll bridge, because the crossing takes just ten or fifteen minutes. In contrast, the wait to cross the "free" bridge can be an hour or two. In my case, at least, the toll bridge is the cheaper alternative.

3 posted on 10/07/2006 6:16:15 PM PDT by Logophile
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Logophile; devolve; MeekOneGOP

This is interesting to me because we go to Mexico frequently and no matter where we cross we have to pay a fee going into Mexico and a fee coming out of Mexico.

I have never heard the words 'free bridge' or 'toll bridge' used in south Texas.


4 posted on 10/07/2006 6:32:35 PM PDT by potlatch (Does a clean house indicate that there is a broken computer in it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

It sounds depressing, having to see the results a governor who's been bought and is now selling out the state for the next 50 years.


5 posted on 10/07/2006 7:34:30 PM PDT by BobL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Logophile
Why are we always so fast to fall for the old "to build more roads, we have to raise taxes" routine. We are taxed out the whazoo now--why don't we demand more efficient use of the taxes that are collected?

There is so much wasted money in every level of our government. Why are we standing still for this and just assuming that it's the only way things can be.

One way to save plenty of money is to cut out all the waste in school spending. Cut out the numerous School superintendants, for starters, and the rest of that bunch. We don't need mulitmillion dollar sports complexes.

We have just gotten used to this being the way businsss is done in any government program. Time to take a deep breath and start demanding a pull back on a lot of this stuff.

6 posted on 10/07/2006 8:01:02 PM PDT by basil (Exercise your Second Amendment rights--buy another gun today.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: basil
How much has the Texas gas tax increased in the past 15 years?

Hint - zero.


How much buying power does the Texas gas tax have today, versus 15 years ago?

Hint - about half.


You already got your way, and the traffic sucks. Now we have psycho-governor who's selling out control of our highways system with contracts that almost certainly contain non-compete clauses.

Thanks much.
7 posted on 10/07/2006 8:20:50 PM PDT by BobL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

I think Costello would endorse Hitler if he would take his side on tollroads.


8 posted on 10/07/2006 8:47:09 PM PDT by DrewsDad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: basil
It's waaaaaaay too late for that kind of stuff basil.

Sorry.

L

9 posted on 10/07/2006 8:49:12 PM PDT by Lurker (islam is not a religion. It's the new face of Fascism in our time. We ignore it at our peril.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

BTTT


10 posted on 10/08/2006 3:02:34 AM PDT by E.G.C.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: BobL
"contracts that almost certainly contain non-compete clauses"

What does "almost certainly" mean?

11 posted on 10/08/2006 3:32:37 AM PDT by Ben Ficklin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Ben Ficklin

"What does "almost certainly" mean?"

It means that no group of private investors is dumb enough to sink 7 billion dollars or so into highway without some assurance that the next (or future governor) won't expand parallel roads (or highways), just to wipe out that investment. It's also called monopoly protection.

But then you already know that.


12 posted on 10/08/2006 5:04:50 AM PDT by BobL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Lurker

Case closed!


13 posted on 10/08/2006 5:33:10 AM PDT by basil (Exercise your Second Amendment rights--buy another gun today.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: basil

Great post Basil. I agree.


14 posted on 10/08/2006 5:38:17 AM PDT by Liberty Valance (Keep a simple manner for a happy life)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: basil

I agree, basil. The people pushing toll roads are like lemmings: "Must have toll roads. Must have toll roads. Must have . . ."

We don't need toll roads, and they will be a bane--like HOV lanes, like light rail--sucking up money like vampires.


15 posted on 10/08/2006 5:46:53 AM PDT by rimtop56
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: BobL

How much money was diverted/robbed/stolen out of the highway fund/taxes to pay for arts/culture projects?

Was the figure WOAI/San Antonio mentioned in the neighborhood of $2 Billion with a B? Do you think, a couple of Billion here, couple of Billion there, and pretty soon there would be enough nmoney to build roads?


16 posted on 10/08/2006 5:59:28 AM PDT by rock58seg (The primaries are over. Hold you your nose if necessary, but ....VOTE!...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: BobL
Let me point out that there is no "almost certainty" in regard to the non-compete clause.

Instead, there is certainty that there is a non-compete clause.

Since we have the internet now, we don't have to listen to the mis-info, exaggerations, and outright lies anymore.

Its real easy. First we go to Google, then to sdvanced search. In the "with all the words" box we type Cintra. In the "with the exact phrase" box we type non compete clause. Tho not neccessary, we can type BobL into the "without the words" box and our results won't be cluttered with all the mis-info posts you have made at FR and other websites.

Then, with a little click of the mouse on search, we are on our way. And what do we find?

Read this, Bob

17 posted on 10/08/2006 6:05:58 AM PDT by Ben Ficklin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: rock58seg
"how much money was diverted/robbed/stolen out of the highway fund/taxes to pay for arts/culture projects?"

More relevant, how much is diverted to education. Big, big chunk.

This is the primary reasons for not raising the gas tax to pay for major road projects. If you do, the money will start accumulating in Austin and the legislature won't be able to keep their hands out of it, using it for other thing like arts/culture projects.

18 posted on 10/08/2006 6:19:07 AM PDT by Ben Ficklin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Ben Ficklin
Wow, thanks for proving my point.

It looks as though there are two non-compete clauses. The first one says "non-compete" and notes a 20 mile width (10 miles on each side), while the second one reads as follows:

"Should TxDOT build something which has a negative impact on the facility, the developer would receive payment with the developer bearing the burden of proof of negative impact."

The above is a free-standing sentence and it is NOT clear whether it relates to the 20 mile non-compete zone, or not.


If the sentence had read something like...

"Should TxDOT build something IN THE NON COMPETE ZONE which has a negative impact on the facility, the developer would receive payment with the developer bearing the burden of proof of negative impact."

...then I would have to agree with you. But, for all I know the sentence, as written, applies universally (i.e., outside the 20 mile zone).


Since you seem to have your own agenda here, I'll leave it to others to make their own judgments. But it would help to get a link to the actual 1600 page document, since, supposedly, it will be released or has been released.

You may love and trust politicians to do what's best for us, and sign 50 YEAR binding contracts and not have to show them to us, but I think that most people here are not quite as trusting of the political class.
19 posted on 10/08/2006 6:47:53 AM PDT by BobL (http://www.brusselsjournal.com/blog/4556 (here is where the real Europe is going))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: BobL

Hahhahhah. You seem to have ignored that part about I 35 being excluded from the non compete clause.


20 posted on 10/08/2006 6:53:21 AM PDT by Ben Ficklin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-77 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson