Hillary Clinton’s treasonous record on national defense

BrookesNews.com ^ | Monday October 16 2006 | Gerard Jackson

[Brian Allen]

As Hillary Clinton is being touted as a presidential candidate for the 2008 election we should take the time to reflect on her co-presidency that did so much to humiliate and degrade America. Let us not forget how the mainstream media covered up — and still is — those Clinton White House scandals that severely compromised US security and put at risk the lives of millions of Americans. I am of course alluding to the transfer of sensitive military technology to China.

This technology greatly improved the accuracy of Peking’s ICBMs that are now targeting American cities. Being the outrageous liar that he is, Clinton denied that USA cities had been targeted despite conclusive proof to the contrary by the CIA. Whose cities did Hillary and hubby think Beijing was going to target? Despite intelligence briefs, Clinton, with the approval of Hillary, knowingly allowed the export of hi-tech know-how to China by Loral, a company that was later investigated by a federal grand jury. That this involved classified information didn’t faze the Clintons one bit. Why was that I wonder?

Is it because in 1997 Bernard Schwarze, Loral’s chairman and CEO, made the largest personal contribution to the Democratic National Committee? The result of Schwarze’s treason (I’m sorry, I meant donation) was that the Clintons got what they wanted — money, Beijing got what it wanted, Schwartz got what he wanted and Americans got to be targets for Chinese missiles. Guess who’s ended up with the biggest grin?

Naturally, the whole smelly deal led right back to Chinese funding for the Clintons’ election campaign. Anyone who thinks Beijing would fund anyone without getting something in exchange is definitely inhaling. The CIA and FBI knew that Beijing was running agents in the US in the guise of fund-raisers for the Democratic National Committee. Charlie Trie, who ‘contributed’ oodles of lettuce to the Clintons’ defence fund, is unquestionably a Chinese agent. It was Charlie who introduced Ol’ Slickory to the Chairman of the Chinese Communist Polytech at a White House fund-raiser. This gentleman, surprise, surprise, is also connected with Chinese intelligence. Not that this would have bother Bubba Clinton and Madam Dragonfly, both of whom still seem to think everything is for sale, even their country’s national security. After all, if the Clintons had beeb genuinely concerned with defending the country they would not have ignored the CIA’s intelligence briefs.

Some might think that I’m drawing a long bow on this. No way. When Johnny Chung didn’t get what he wanted on PRC visitors to the White House with whom did he meet? You guessed it, Hillary. And did she give him what he wanted? You bet she did. Now why would she do that? For fear of appearing churlish there were Hillary’s long-standing ties with Charlie Trie that went right back to Littlerock. That Charlie was a money-peddling Chinese agent was just bad luck for her — not to mention the country — wasn’t it? And who had Johnny Huang, another Chinese agent, appointed to the Commerce Department? Right again. It was Hillary. Boy, she sure knew how to pick ‘em.

We all know that there were serious security leaks from the Clinton White House. Equally, there is no doubt about the source of those leaks, which brings us directly back to Hillary the Succubus. She took it upon herself, with her husband’s happy support, to select a great many of the White House staff. Many of these appointees were known, and still are, for their extreme left-wing views and their belief that the US is an unjust, racist, sexist and exploitative society. It should come as no surprise, therefore, if this deep-rooted animosity to their own country should take the form of an occasional phone call to a Chinese agent. Of course, if this had been anyone else, except the Groper, it would have immediately raised questions about why this pair were so keen on appointing people who despise their own society.

Does anyone really believe Hillary Clinton has changed? Does anyone think that if she were president she would not bring in the same ratbag America-haters as before with all that that entails?

Gerard Jackson is Brookes’ economics editor

[SaltyJoe]

Why forget Bush and Clinton? Because I want to know the source of your dissatisfaction.

Defensive battles are loosing situations strategically. History is on the side of one who takes the fight to the enemy. By putting the free world's warriors and influence into the heart of tyranny, it has sucked all the localized bullies away from neighboring territories to get their butts kicked by American/NATO (with recent friends, like the Poles) trigger pullers.

Because Coalition troops are in Iraq and Afghanistan, it has relieved pressure of Jihad in many many other areas. If ground forces weren't put into the heart of tyranny, then Jihad would have continued to be exported to our hemisphere, and particularly through the countries that have criminal elements that infiltrate our borders. Yes, there are still leaks. But the source of the leak must fixed before the other leaks. It is a priority that cannot be reversed. Jihad is knocked off balance and will continue to lose so long as the free world doesn't falter.