Skip to comments.
Hillary Clinton’s treasonous record on national defense
BrookesNews.com ^
| Monday October 16 2006
| Gerard Jackson
Posted on 10/16/2006 1:50:01 PM PDT by Brian Allen
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41 last
To: raybbr
Why forget Bush and Clinton? Because I want to know the source of your dissatisfaction.
Defensive battles are loosing situations strategically. History is on the side of one who takes the fight to the enemy. By putting the free world's warriors and influence into the heart of tyranny, it has sucked all the localized bullies away from neighboring territories to get their butts kicked by American/NATO (with recent friends, like the Poles) trigger pullers.
Because Coalition troops are in Iraq and Afghanistan, it has relieved pressure of Jihad in many many other areas. If ground forces weren't put into the heart of tyranny, then Jihad would have continued to be exported to our hemisphere, and particularly through the countries that have criminal elements that infiltrate our borders. Yes, there are still leaks. But the source of the leak must fixed before the other leaks. It is a priority that cannot be reversed. Jihad is knocked off balance and will continue to lose so long as the free world doesn't falter.
41
posted on
10/18/2006 9:07:48 PM PDT
by
SaltyJoe
("Social Justice" for the Unborn Child)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson