Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

UN says growing pollution threatens recovery of damaged reefs
Space Daily ^ | 10/19/2006 | AFP

Posted on 10/19/2006 11:08:06 AM PDT by cogitator

Coastal pollution from land development may be obstructing the recovery of coral reefs damaged by rising sea temperatures, the United Nations said Thursday, warning of new threats to the world's oceans.

The UN Environment Programme said in a report that "land-based pollution, reclamation, clearing of coastal vegetation and poor sewage control can damage reefs."

"More importantly," it said, "they demonstrate that protection of coastal land area around marine protected areas is essential for reducing local pollution and facilitating re-colonization of corals."

Coral reefs sustained widespread damage in the late 1990s due to higher than normal surface temperatures caused by global warming that had a severe bleaching effect, it said.

Reef recovery is essential to preserving oceanic eco-systems but is jeopardized by rapid coastal development, UNEP said in the report entitled "Our Precious Coasts: Marine Pollution, Climate Change and Resilience of Coastal Ecosystems."

It found that an estimated 70 percent of the world's tropical coasts have been developed and projected that 90 percent would be developed by the year 2030.

"Nature can always recover, but the domino effect of bleaching events caused by global warming with pollution has significantly altered the ability of coral reefs to do so," said UNEP Executive Director Achim Steiner.

He urged nations to boost marine protected areas to help corals regrow.

Damaged reefs in waters surrounding Mahe, the main island of Seychelles in the Indian Ocean, are recovering at rates ranging from five to 70 percent but those in protected areas are generally recovering faster, the report said.

The findings, presented at an international marine pollution conference in Beijing and in a statement from UNEP headquarters in Nairobi, were released ahead of a major climate change summit in the Kenyan capital next month.

Coral reefs, sometimes referred to as "rainforests of the sea," bring an estimated 30 billion dollars (24 billion euros) in revenue to local fishing and tourism industries around the world, the report said.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Government
KEYWORDS: conservation; pollution; recovery; reefs
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last
From what I've read, coastal water quality degradation is actually a more immediate and significant threat to coral reef health than warmer ocean temperatures.
1 posted on 10/19/2006 11:08:06 AM PDT by cogitator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: cogitator
UN says...

All I needed to read.

2 posted on 10/19/2006 11:10:03 AM PDT by proud_yank (Socialism - An Answer In Search Of A Question For Over 100 Years)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: proud_yank
All I needed to read.

That's too bad. In this case, the message is more important than the messenger.

3 posted on 10/19/2006 11:11:04 AM PDT by cogitator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: cogitator
the United Nations said

Well all you needed to see was this to know this is total nonsense. Just another fraudulent Chicken Little panic attack to justify the continuing raping of the Taxpayers pocket book by the Junk Scientists.

Let's see. Since the 1960s, Pollution, Overpopulation, Peak Oil, Global Cooling, Starvation, Killer Bees, Aids etc etc etc ad nausea have been the coming global Armageddon.

Funny thing, after raping the Taxpayers for years on this hysteria, the doom and gloom pronouncements magically vanish until the next media manufactured hysteria is needed to pump up Junk Scientist budgets.

4 posted on 10/19/2006 11:14:02 AM PDT by MNJohnnie (EeevilCon, Snowflake, Conservative Fundamentalist Gun Owning Bush Bot Dittohead reporting for duty!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cogitator
True. Try drinking water in Mexico or Venezuela. I always drank bottled water or beer when on projects in those two sh!t-hole countries.

Once I ordered a vodka on the rocks.... Three guesses...

5 posted on 10/19/2006 11:14:58 AM PDT by Cobra64 (Why is the War on Terror being managed by the DEFENSE Department?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cogitator

The UN should just stop polluting.


6 posted on 10/19/2006 11:15:38 AM PDT by <1/1,000,000th%
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cogitator
I won't debate that there are environmental issues to be faced, however some things are hard to bite into. For instance:

It found that an estimated 70 percent of the world's tropical coasts have been developed and projected that 90 percent would be developed by the year 2030.

I find this hard to believe.

If the UN wants to pass 'international legislation' to ban development, keep it in the 3rd world dumps. They do not govern the United States.
7 posted on 10/19/2006 11:20:21 AM PDT by proud_yank (Socialism - An Answer In Search Of A Question For Over 100 Years)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Cobra64
Once I ordered a vodka on the rocks.... Three guesses...

Please don't tell me you literally got vodka over rocks!
8 posted on 10/19/2006 11:21:27 AM PDT by proud_yank (Socialism - An Answer In Search Of A Question For Over 100 Years)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: <1/1,000,000th%; girlangler

If we bulldozed the UN HQ into the Atlantic, it'd make for a nice artificial reef, no?


9 posted on 10/19/2006 11:22:05 AM PDT by proud_yank (Socialism - An Answer In Search Of A Question For Over 100 Years)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: cogitator

Oh...I thought it said "reefers". Nevermind!


10 posted on 10/19/2006 11:24:16 AM PDT by hophead ("Enjoy Every Sandwich")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie

This is an unwarranted attack. Do a little research yourself and find out if the threats to coral reefs are real or not (hint: they are). Your attitude in this case is a bit too head-in-the-sand.


11 posted on 10/19/2006 11:25:54 AM PDT by cogitator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: proud_yank

No. Those "rocks" kept me in the can for about a day.


12 posted on 10/19/2006 11:36:01 AM PDT by Cobra64 (Why is the War on Terror being managed by the DEFENSE Department?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: proud_yank
I find this hard to believe.

I wouldn't mind seeing how the numbers were processed, but I wouldn't be surprised that tropical coasts are significantly developed -- they are popular places! Case in point:

Seven Mile Beach, Grand Cayman

Map of Seven Mile Beach, Grand Cayman:

Map of resorts on Phuket Island, Thailand (made famous by the tsumami):


13 posted on 10/19/2006 11:37:26 AM PDT by cogitator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: cogitator
I thought the oceanic ecosystem is under attack, as in out of balance, due to the mass killing of sharks for their fins.
14 posted on 10/19/2006 11:42:38 AM PDT by b4its2late (I'm not insensitive, I just don't care.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: b4its2late
I thought the oceanic ecosystem is under attack, as in out of balance, due to the mass killing of sharks for their fins.

That doesn't help. There are several instances (wolves in Yellowstone is another) that show when top predators are eliminated or substantially reduced, entire ecosystems are altered.

Wolves are rebalancing Yellowstone ecosystem

15 posted on 10/19/2006 11:46:38 AM PDT by cogitator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: cogitator
And the sharks can't reproduce fast enough to keep up. I think it's in the far east where it is rampant......
16 posted on 10/19/2006 11:47:58 AM PDT by b4its2late (I'm not insensitive, I just don't care.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: cogitator

No kidding. Liberals come out against trashing nature and to some people, that makes turning the world into one big dump a conservative value. It isn't.

Reflexive opposition to the message bearer instead of a position that stands on its own merits should be left to Dingy Harry and the rest of the congressional socialists.


17 posted on 10/19/2006 11:56:21 AM PDT by CGTRWK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: CGTRWK

It's too bad. The eco-nazis and their antics have made us numb to the fact that there are true environmental concerns in the world. I just got home from Bermuda, one of the last places on Earth with an undisturbed reef system, a true treasure in this day and age.


18 posted on 10/19/2006 12:10:06 PM PDT by Ace of Spades (Sed quis custodiet ipsos custodes?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: cogitator

This is like the homeless people stories that returned when GWBush took office.

These environwacko stories only happen to influence elections.


19 posted on 10/19/2006 12:15:51 PM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: longtermmemmory
These environwacko stories only happen to influence elections.

Well, the environmental threats to coral reefs don't happen just to influence elections.

20 posted on 10/19/2006 12:29:15 PM PDT by cogitator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson