Posted on 12/29/2006 12:13:05 PM PST by shrinkermd
We aren't. That's up to the stockholders.
No one is objecting to pay negotiated in the free market between a willing employee and a willing employer.
However, if you put all your buddies on the Board of Directors, and they vote you the CEO of the year, that is a different matter. He who does that is just conspiring to transfer the output from capital the stockholders have put up into his own pocket.
I have no quarrel with guys like Blll Gates and Warren Buffet--they have spent their lifetimes creating enormous wealth.
But the guy who signs on today with a company that already has a capitalization of $10 billion, what did he do to earn a big stake? I would at least like to see a little performance first, and I mean compared to other companies in that sector.
I would at least like to see a little performance first, and I mean compared to other companies in that sector.
That's not how it works. The board decides the compensation package. If the shareholders don't like the decisions of the board they have recourse.
The day anyone besides the shareholders decides how to compensate employees is a sad day!
"We will take things away from you for the common good..."
But isn't that the point of the article? The only thing that matters is what the Board and stockholders like to see.
Stick around a few years. The model is changing.
There won't be as many guaranteed contracts in the future. There sure won't be any back-dated stock options, either.
It'll be game over.
What I find appalling are these guys who run a company into the ground then get paid millions just to leave.
Worth $25 million/year?
Yup, if the ticket and TV sales are any judge.
" What I find appalling are these guys who run a company into the ground then get paid millions just to leave.
Actually, that has some value for the astute investor. You could have picked up Pfitzer at 20 and change because of the guy they had. Good dividend, too.
You could have
Lotsa guys hit .290, and don't get $25 mil. And of course, the Yanks sucked badly in October this year ... not that I mind.
Exactly!
Why are coporate executives the only ones being vilified for earnings?
Let's talk about professional athletes along with college coaches or university presidents, etc.....
This thread was needed a few days ago.
Let's talk about professional athletes along with college coaches or university presidents, etc.....
Or musicians such as Paul McCartney and David Bowie, who are billionaires if memory serves me right.
Every heard a liberal complain about them and that they need to pay their fair share and have some of that wealth redistributed?
Granted they are not Americans but a sizable amount of their income and wealth comes from the American market.
Who Are We To Say Who Is Overpaid?
I have an opinion, and because we have free speech in this country, I can voice my opinion.
You don't have to like my opinion or agree with it.
I think there are many people who are overpaid for what they do. So, there!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.