Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

On the advice of counsel, I cannot recall!
1 posted on 03/02/2007 3:19:02 AM PST by ricks_place
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: abner; Alia; AmishDude; AntiGuv; beyondashadow; Bitter Bierce; bjc; Bogeygolfer; BossLady; ...

Pinging the DukeLax list.


2 posted on 03/02/2007 3:22:12 AM PST by abb (The Dinosaur Media: A One-Way Medium in a Two-Way World)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ricks_place
I have no recollection

Standard dhimmicratic tactic.
5 posted on 03/02/2007 3:37:06 AM PST by Beckwith (The dhimmicrats and liberal media have chosen sides and they've sided with the Jihadists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ricks_place

The Hillary strategy.


6 posted on 03/02/2007 3:41:46 AM PST by DOGEY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ricks_place

What an imbecile. There is something seriously wrong with this guy.

(Maybe he's angling for an insanity defense.)


7 posted on 03/02/2007 3:57:21 AM PST by PBRSTREETGANG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ricks_place

"I know nothing about anything".


8 posted on 03/02/2007 4:13:43 AM PST by baltoga
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ricks_place

> He (Nifong) said he had never before encountered such determined pretrial resistance. "A well-connected and well-financed (but not, I would suggest, well-intentioned) group of individuals -- most of whom are neither in nor from North Carolina, have taken it upon themselves to ensure that this case never reaches trial."


Yep, its a vast right-wing conspiracy.


9 posted on 03/02/2007 4:54:56 AM PST by jim_trent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ricks_place
Uh, its not up to you Mr. Nifong to suggest what, if any, is the significance of the evidence.

P.S. I hope you have other employable skills other than those of falsely accusing others.

13 posted on 03/02/2007 5:47:41 AM PST by AZRepublican ("The degree in which a measure is necessary can never be a test of the legal right to adopt it.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ricks_place
But Nifong said he did not see the [DNA] test results as necessarily favorable to the defense.

"They neither suggested that no assault took place nor that the assault was committed by someone else," Nifong said.

How did this idiot graduate from high school, let alone law school?

14 posted on 03/02/2007 5:48:07 AM PST by freespirited (Demand perfection, get Hillary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ricks_place

He was saying so much to so many media outlets, that I doubt he can get away with this tactic, there's got to be footage or printed material that will trip him up.

If he managed to avoid doing anything to compromise such a defense, than he is more conniving and venal than we ever imagined. And I would expect the defense teams will really unleash on him personally.

Was he laying all those traps, seeding all of that racial hatred knowing where all the legal lines were, and carefully avoiding crossing them, in case the whole mess imploded just like it is doing now????


15 posted on 03/02/2007 5:54:08 AM PST by pinz-n-needlez (Jack Bauer wears Tony Snow pajamas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ricks_place

The Hillary defence.


16 posted on 03/02/2007 5:55:18 AM PST by Unicorn (Too many wimps around.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ricks_place
He offered several explanations for some of the problems that have arisen:

* The lacrosse case arose "during the last few weeks of a hotly-contested Democratic Party primary in which I was seeking to retain my office," he said. "I was not always able to give the case my full attention."

Typical, the election of a democrat takes priority over the rights of the citizenry.

Considering that he was appointed by the governor to fill out a term with the agreement he WOULD NOT SEEK ELECTION to the office, Mr. Nifong is a lying backstabbing political hack

19 posted on 03/02/2007 7:19:51 AM PST by Robe (Rome did not create a great empire by talking, they did it by killing all those who opposed them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ricks_place

But I do believe that this is a battle. I mean, look at the very people who are involved in this—they have popped up in other settings. This is—the great story here for anybody willing to find it and write about it and explain it is this vast right-wing conspiracy that has been conspiring against my husband me since the day he announced for presidentI indicted the lacrosse hooligans."

24 posted on 03/02/2007 8:29:55 AM PST by SkyPilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ricks_place; Howlin; ladyjane; JLS; abb
As I understand his "defense," it boils down to a few elements.

1. I don't recall a meeting.

2. I was distracted and couldn't give my full attention to the case.

3. Other people who were helping me weren't reading the material, they were just copying it. It's their fault, not mine! Oh, I know I was the lead investigator, but why do I have to do everything?

4. Never, and I mean NEVER, did I expect such a spirited response pre-trial. It's simply not fair to the prosecution when people have the means and the will to fight for their freedom.

5. Yeah, yeah, yeah. I know that the test results didn't implicate any of the defendants. However, in my professional opinion as a prosecutor, that doesn't mean it was favorable to the defense, so I didn't think it was necessary to let them know about it.

26 posted on 03/02/2007 9:51:29 AM PST by Enterprise (Drop pork bombs on the Islamofascist wankers. Praise the Lord and pass the hammunition.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ricks_place

"I cannot recall"

Worked for the clintons every time!


38 posted on 03/02/2007 1:02:01 PM PST by freeangel ( (free speech is only good until someone else doesn't like what you say))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ricks_place
The lacrosse case arose "during the last few weeks of a hotly-contested Democratic Party primary in which I was seeking to retain my office," he said. "I was not always able to give the case my full attention."

Yes, we know. He was more concerned about his reelection than getting to the bottom of the case.

41 posted on 03/02/2007 1:37:46 PM PST by Texas Mom (Two places you're always welcome - church and Grandma's house.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ricks_place
"For me, this case was an eyewitness identification case, one in which I was looking for DNA evidence that either corroborated that identification or refuted it," Nifong said.

OK, so what DNA evidence would have refuted it? Perhaps finding DNA of multiple different men in each of her orifices, none of which matched any of the men that she identified?

I'm having a hard time thinking of any way that DNA evidence could have refuted the identification any more definitively than that.

45 posted on 03/02/2007 5:17:45 PM PST by Bubba_Leroy (What did Rather know and when did he know it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ricks_place
On the advice of counsel, I cannot recall!

You.. can be a millionaire.. and never pay taxes! You can be a millionaire.. and never pay taxes! You say.. "Steve.. how can I be a millionaire.. and never pay taxes?" First.. get a million dollars.

Now.. you say, "Steve.. what do I say to the tax man when he comes to my door and says, 'You.. have never paid taxes'?" Two simple words. Two simple words in the English language: "I forgot!"

How many times do we let ourselves get into terrible situations because we don't say "I forgot"? Let's say you're on trial for armed robbery. You say to the judge, "I forgot armed robbery was illegal."

Let's suppose he says back to you, "You have committed a foul crime. you have stolen hundreds and thousands of dollars from people at random, and you say, 'I forgot'?" Two simple words: Excuuuuuse me!!"

Steve Martin, Saturday Night Live (1977)

46 posted on 03/02/2007 5:29:47 PM PST by Bubba_Leroy (What did Rather know and when did he know it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ricks_place

Disbarment is too lenient a punishment for this scumbag. He deserves hard time. You can bet that his behavior in the Lax case is not isolated. There could be dozens more people railroaded by Nifong.


50 posted on 03/02/2007 8:03:22 PM PST by SmoothTalker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ricks_place
Seeing as how Nifong has no recall of a session that everyone else remembers well, doesn't the voters have a right to recall Nifong?
62 posted on 03/03/2007 1:43:00 AM PST by F.J. Mitchell (Dems and RINOs: Too stupid 2 lead, too vain 2 follow, too egotistical 2 get the hell out of the way!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ricks_place

"I have no recollection of the most pivotal event in my life."


69 posted on 03/03/2007 2:39:40 AM PST by PJ-Comix (Join the DUmmie FUnnies PING List for the FUNNIEST Blog on the Web)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson