Skip to comments.
SAVAGE NATION LIVE!! Thursday, March 15, 2007
Posted on 03/15/2007 2:34:33 PM PDT by Tarkus2040
BE HERE, OR BE NOWHERE!
TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 18004498255; 1800ahole; 1trollallrudeness; 1trollnoclass; 1trollnocourage; bigot; borders; culture; kewlzot; language; mouthbreather; nobushbots; poodletalk; rudelooneyperson; savage; spew; talkradio; terrymcauliffedream; themanchurianhost; truth; xenophobecentral; zotchat
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 181-184 next last
To: AmericanInfidel0; beaversmom; beyond the sea; b4its2late; BigTom85; blackdiamondracer; ...
CALLING ALL INFIDELS!
2
posted on
03/15/2007 2:35:01 PM PDT
by
Tarkus2040
(Only a conservative nationalist party can save America!)
To: All
Welcome,
To
The Savage Nation!
Borders, Language, Culture
The Savage Nation
is on-the-air, LIVE!
America's #1-Rated Independent Talk Radio Show...
America's #3-Ranked Talk Radio Show...
Freerepublic's Most Controversial Talk Radio Show...
Now On 370+ Stations...10,000,000+ Listeners, Weekly.
Relax, imbibe and sup while you're listening to
Dr. Mike's 3hr Show.
Your Gracious, Infidel Host: Tarkus2040.
The Savage Nation
Virtual "Wine Cellars".
Are now extensively-renovated and extremely-well-stocked,
they are now open to the public.
Our TSN Master Chef/ Expert Sommelier "in-exile"
formerly known as *BSB*
guides every wine slection, and dinner preparation from *afar*,
for your culinary drinking/ dining pleasure.
Your Gracious, Oenophile Host: Tarkus2040.
The Savage Nation
Virtual "Buffet" Table".
A veritable 20-course dinner, which everyone
especially Fellow & Fellowette, Savage-"Infidels"
and Savage-"unbelievers" included
are invited to partake of the bounteous food and drink.
The plates are warmed,
the flatware and glasses are spotless,
the linen tablecloths and napkins are freshly-laundered,
and the icewater & vino glasses are never empty.
Your Gracious, Gourmand Host: Tarkus2040.
The Savage Nation
Virtual "Lounge & Bar".
Unlike the many FR-thread "pretenders" of true, gracious hospitality,
we know that booze, ice & glass is a real artform.
And we know how to maximize your visiting pleasure.
Just "belly-up" and give us your order. We'll take it from there.
Meanwhile, enjoy Dr. Mike's show!
Your Gracious & Flirty Host: Tarkus2040.
3
posted on
03/15/2007 2:35:37 PM PDT
by
Tarkus2040
(Only a conservative nationalist party can save America!)
To: Tarkus2040
TSN Queen, Reporting for Troll Patrol!
4
posted on
03/15/2007 2:36:34 PM PDT
by
Tamar1973
(Every Thread a BYJ Thread (http://www.byj.co.kr/))
To: AmericanInfidel0; beaversmom; beyond the sea; b4its2late; BigTom85; blackdiamondracer; ...
Good evening, Infidels and Infidettes! My father and I were discussing the "anchor baby" problem earlier today, and it inspired me to do some researching of the subject with the help of Google. Since I'm not an expert regarding the US Constitution, I knew little of a clause in the 14th Amendment known as the "Citizenship Clause," and how the Supreme Court has interpreted said clause since its introduction shortly after the Civil War. Anyway, here's a blog entry (or article) I've found regarding the topic at hand. It's required homework for you TSN fans and regulars, so please take the time and read it!
Alien Birthright Citizenship: A Fable That Lives Through Ignorance
http://federalistblog.us/2005/12/birthright_citizenship_fable.html
As we can see, the Citizenship Clause of the 14th Amendment does not cover those who illegally sneak into the country for the sole purpose of giving birth on US soil, and said baby (and the parents for that matter) are NOT recognized by the Federal government as citizens or otherwise. So, individual towns/cities/states can pass all the laws they want regarding the "legal" status of illegal aliens and their anchor babies, but will NOT be recognized by Federal law (namely the US Constitution). Although, for some strange reason, the Supreme Court's ruling (well, rather their "interpretation" of the Citizenship Clause) in the US v. Wong Kim Ark case (1898) gave instant citizenship to babies born on US soil of parents who hold no allegiance to the US (in other words, those parents who are not naturalized US citizens, or those who are going through the proper channels of becoming naturalized citizens).
Now I can understand why the current Supreme Court hasn't revisited the Citizenship Clause, the lot of pro-illegal, open border supporters that they are. But why hasn't the Supreme Court, in the past one-hundred plus years since the Wong Kim Ark case, ruled (or at least revisited) the Citizenship Clause? I find it hard to believe that our country hasn't had a *true* conservative Supreme Court member majority in the past hundred years! We all know that our country was at its strongest, conservative and sovereign-wise, post WWII. So if the Citizenship Clause didn't have a chance to be interpreted correctly by the Supreme Court at that time, what chance do we have now? Here, in the days of faux conservatism, the chances of revisiting (or ruling upon) the Citizenship Clause via the US Supreme Court seems extremely unlikely. But in reality, every single child borne from illegal residents, since the introduction of the Citizenship Clause in the 14th Amendment, is NOT a citizen of the United States. Instead of introducing new "immigration" bills (I'm looking straight at you, President Bush), enforce the laws that are already on the books and in the Constitution! It shouldn't be treated as a religious text that needs to be interpreted by a group of scholars (the US Supreme Court) as to its "true" meaning (or what's more politically advantageous to the SC Justices).
At the rate (and ratio) these illegals have children, even if the borders were completely sealed today, it won't be long before our country not only begins to resemble that of Mexico (which has already happened in certain areas), but to be governed in the same fashion as well. If you think President Bush has undermined the identity and sovereignty of our country, you haven't seen nothin' yet! The invasion and conquer of America without firing (almost) a shot. Incredible.
5
posted on
03/15/2007 2:38:06 PM PDT
by
Tarkus2040
(Only a conservative nationalist party can save America!)
To: Tamar1973
Good evening, milady. I'm glad you're on OUR side! LOL!
6
posted on
03/15/2007 2:41:05 PM PDT
by
Tarkus2040
(Only a conservative nationalist party can save America!)
To: Tarkus2040
(MMGIMC) Mainstream-Media-Governmental-Industrial-Military-Complex
BM
To: Tarkus2040
Good evening, milady. I'm glad you're on OUR side! LOL! As always! : )
8
posted on
03/15/2007 2:43:00 PM PDT
by
Tamar1973
(Every Thread a BYJ Thread (http://www.byj.co.kr/))
To: Tarkus2040
Nice post on anchor babies. I have seen that before. Problem is the prostitutes in black dresses judges ruling on these matters.
9
posted on
03/15/2007 2:44:13 PM PDT
by
dynachrome
("Where am I? Where am I going? Why am I in a handbasket?")
To: Tarkus2040
I'd rather be nowhere. At least I'm not enraged or depressed from having to listen to Mikey.
To: MovementConservative
No one forced you to come over, no one is forcing you to listen, MovementConservative. Don't let the door hit you on the way out too hard.
11
posted on
03/15/2007 2:48:33 PM PDT
by
Tamar1973
(Every Thread a BYJ Thread (http://www.byj.co.kr/))
To: dynachrome
Nice post on anchor babies. I have seen that before. Problem is the prostitutes in black dresses judges ruling on these matters. Danke, DC! BTW, that's an excellent description of the SC Justices. LOL!
12
posted on
03/15/2007 2:49:56 PM PDT
by
Tarkus2040
(Only a conservative nationalist party can save America!)
To: MovementConservative
In order to stay regular its nice to have a "movement" once in awhile.
To: Tarkus2040
Listening to Jerry Doyle while waiting for Savage to grace us with his presence and he just finished an interview with Dick Morris. They were discussing Pres. Clinton and Halliburton's deals with Dubai.
14
posted on
03/15/2007 2:51:36 PM PDT
by
Tamar1973
(Every Thread a BYJ Thread (http://www.byj.co.kr/))
To: southparkNationalist; MovementConservative
In order to stay regular its nice to have a "movement" once in awhile. Here's something to help with that.
15
posted on
03/15/2007 2:53:01 PM PDT
by
Tamar1973
(Every Thread a BYJ Thread (http://www.byj.co.kr/))
To: MovementConservative
"enraged or depressed "
Need to be enraged at least. Pres. Bush and the rest of the merrry band are busy throwing AG Gonzales under the bus. Do they think the marx-o-crats will then love them? Neville Chamberlain is laughing.
16
posted on
03/15/2007 2:53:40 PM PDT
by
dynachrome
("Where am I? Where am I going? Why am I in a handbasket?")
To: southparkNationalist
In order to stay regular its nice to have a "movement" once in awhile. LMAO! I believe the true definition of a "movement" conservative is the ideology of the movement of illegals from south of the border to here in the US.
17
posted on
03/15/2007 2:54:07 PM PDT
by
Tarkus2040
(Only a conservative nationalist party can save America!)
To: dynachrome
Pres. Bush and the rest of the merrry band are busy throwing AG Gonzales under the bus. The Demoncrats don't respect weaklings anymore than Muslim fanatics do.
Do they think the marx-o-crats will then love them? Neville Chamberlain is laughing.
No. Neville Chamberlin is probably crying. He repented of his errors after Churchill became PM. He realized too late you can't appease evil.
We aren't students of history in this country anymore. We'd rather study ANS's will than what's really important.
18
posted on
03/15/2007 2:57:01 PM PDT
by
Tamar1973
(Every Thread a BYJ Thread (http://www.byj.co.kr/))
To: Tamar1973
Dick Morris is now promoting an organization called Divest Terror.org, affiliated with
The Center for Security PolicyThe primary objective of this campaign is to force governments to choose between their sponsorship of terrorism and critical partnerships with publicly traded firms.
19
posted on
03/15/2007 2:58:46 PM PDT
by
Tamar1973
(Every Thread a BYJ Thread (http://www.byj.co.kr/))
To: Tarkus2040
Hello Savage Fans And TSN Queen!!!!
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 181-184 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson