Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Global Warming Debate
Captialism Magazine ^ | 5/7/07 | Tom DeWeese

Posted on 05/21/2007 7:53:25 AM PDT by libertarianPA

With great fanfare, in March, Al Gore took Capitol Hill like a conquering hero as he testified on Global Warming before both houses of Congress. Fresh from conquests at the Academy Awards where his adoring Hollywood elites showered him with coveted golden statues for spreading their favorite propaganda, Gore was determined to turn his personal conquest into draconian federal law and ultimate human misery.

Gore's words to Congress were predictable. The earth is warming. The polar ice caps are melting. Polar bears are on the run. And it's man's fault. Solution? Ban or control human activities. The mantra of the religion of Global Warming is getting a little boring. It's quite possible, however, that Gore's appearance on the Hill actually represents the beginning of the end of his influence on climate policy rather than the start of a legislative tsunami.

Why? Because even after the Global Warming storm troopers, armed with billions of dollars, the backing of the Hollywood elite, the news media and most of academia have done everything possible to threaten, bully and force their one-sided propaganda on us, the so-called global warming skeptics seem to be coming out of their hiding places in ever greater numbers. The debate is now taking a dramatic change. As the skeptic side is heard, more Americans are beginning to understand that there are legitimate reasons for skepticism. Here are just a few of the latest developments.

(Excerpt) Read more at capmag.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: blaspheminggore; globalwarming; gore; religionofgore; shift
Too bad Newt Gingrich chose not to add to this promising momentum in his own debate with John Kerry, where be conceded from the start that GW is man-made.
1 posted on 05/21/2007 7:53:28 AM PDT by libertarianPA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: libertarianPA

Too bad the author didn’t include links.


2 posted on 05/21/2007 8:02:22 AM PDT by patton (19yrs ... only 4,981yrs to go ;))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: libertarianPA; Killing Time; Beowulf; Mr. Peabody; RW_Whacko; honolulugal; SideoutFred; Ole Okie; ..


FReepmail me to get on or off
Click on POGW graphic for full GW rundown
Dr. John Ray's
GREENIE WATCH



3 posted on 05/21/2007 8:05:10 AM PDT by xcamel (Press to Test, Release to Detonate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: libertarianPA

As a minimum, I can get any global warming supporter to change their view that “the debate is over” to “there are still open issues”.


4 posted on 05/21/2007 8:14:03 AM PDT by kidd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kidd

That’s a big step! Back when Gore’s film came out, the religious dogma was deeply woven into the public. Luckily, the alternative media and Fox have been doing their jobs bringing this issue back to debate status.


5 posted on 05/21/2007 8:17:38 AM PDT by libertarianPA (http://www.amarxica.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: libertarianPA

The climate change scare is a textbook example of the big lie technique.

Al Gore knows this, IMHO.


6 posted on 05/21/2007 8:21:03 AM PDT by OK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: libertarianPA

Debate had about as much effect as their 1 day gas boycott.


7 posted on 05/21/2007 8:30:54 AM PDT by Son House ( Democrats are Hostile to Tax Payers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: libertarianPA
The debate is now taking a dramatic change. As the skeptic side is heard, more Americans are beginning to understand that there are legitimate reasons for skepticism.


8 posted on 05/21/2007 8:36:56 AM PDT by Donald Rumsfeld Fan (NY Times: "fake but accurate")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OK

Why do you think he owns a mansion that uses up 20x as much energy as the average American? It’s like John Edwards talking about “Two Americas” and then reporting $29 million in earnings. Hypocricy.


9 posted on 05/21/2007 8:43:40 AM PDT by libertarianPA (http://www.amarxica.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: libertarianPA

ping


10 posted on 05/21/2007 8:52:41 AM PDT by N2Gems
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: libertarianPA
Americans are beginning to understand that there are legitimate reasons for skepticism.

Look over the descriptions of the following two houses and see if you can identify their owners.

HOUSE # 1:
A 20-room mansion (not including 8 bathrooms) heated by natural gas. Add on a pool (and a pool house) and a separate guesthouse all heated by gas. In one month alone this mansion consumes more energy than the average American household in an entire year. The average bill for electricity and natural gas runs over $2,400.00 per month. In natural gas alone (which last time we checked was a fossil fuel), this property consumes more than 20 times the national average for an American home. This house is not in a northern or midwestern "snow belt," either. It's in the South.

HOUSE # 2:
Designed by an architecture professor at a leading national university, this house incorporates every "green" feature current home construction can provide. The house contains only 4,000 square feet (4 bedrooms) and is nestled on arid high prairie in the American southwest. A central closet in the house holds geothermal heat pumps drawing ground water through pipes sunk 300 feet into the ground. The water (usually 67 degrees F.) heats the house in winter and cools it in summer. The system uses no fossil fuels such as oil or natural gas, and it consumes 25% of the electricity required for a conventional heating/cooling system. Rainwater from the roof is collected and funneled into a 25,000-gallon underground cistern. Wastewater from showers, sinks, and toilets goes into underground purifying tanks and then into the cistern. The collected water then irrigates the land surrounding the house. Flowers and shrubs native to the area blend the property into the surrounding rural landscape.

Now for the ownership:

HOUSE # 1 (20 room energy guzzling mansion)
is outside of Nashville, Tennessee. It is the abode of that renowned environmentalist (and filmmaker) hypocrite Al Gore.

HOUSE # 2 (model eco-friendly house)
is on a ranch near Crawford, Texas also known as "the Texas White House," it is the private residence of the President of the United States, George W. Bush.

11 posted on 05/21/2007 9:04:28 AM PDT by MosesKnows
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: patton

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=2332531355859226455&q=global+swindle


12 posted on 05/21/2007 10:46:32 AM PDT by Alice in Wonderland ( http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gFsiZ2l2K5U)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson