Posted on 06/20/2007 12:30:02 PM PDT by Baladas
The University of Michigan at Dearborn is planning to spend $25,000 to install two footbaths for Muslim students to use before prayers.
Muslim leaders had considered trying to raise funds to pay for the baths privately until the American Civil Liberties Union said it would not oppose having the university pay for the project. The director of the Detroit ACLU called the footbaths a "reasonable accommodation" to resolve "safety and cleanliness issues."
The ACLU has a long history of opposing other activities associated with prayer and religion on public property. It sued a Louisiana school board over allowing a preacher to give out pizza at school during lunch periods, and it sued a west Texas school district over an optional Bible class.
(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...
WTF is wrong with the cretins at the ACLU?
I water wet? Does a pig shiite in it’s pen? Is the ACLU a communist front?
ok - this is making my blood boil
“Gee, what are these funny looking urinals?” they wondered as as they peed into them. “Why are they so low to the floor?”
“safety and cleanliness issues.”
So the ACLU is saying that Muslims have dirtier feet than non-Muslims? That sounds very stereotypical to me.
How better for the ACLU to demonstrate their hatred for America than to conspire with muslims?
Nothing they are hate America communists.
You KNOW they don’t spend $25,000 on footbaths in their homelands. Those plastic bins are like $1.00 at Dollar General - why not use those?
It’s not just the spending of the money that’s unconstitutional. Here is an important part of the illegal nature of this proposal:
“footbaths for Muslim students”
Apparently, you have to be Muslim to use them.
Ergo, either the ACLU is truly demented in a Hollywood kind of way, or it is a business decision based on funding.
I choose both.
Why not stop them from washing their feet in the sink? It’s $25,000 cheaper...
The ACLU supports the jihadists even if they don’t support the jihad...
Actually, someone should walk into court with a box load of ACLU cases from other jurisdictions, and demand that the court shut this project down, AND pay attorneys fees and costs to the parties who had to sue to shut it down.
Also, why did the Dearborn Muslims ask the DETROIT ACLU for clearance on their footbaths? Were they looking for an ACLU affiliate that was so friendly to Muslims that it was brain-dead on the law? Looks that way to me.
Congressman Billybob
Latest article, "Bar Fight in the Blue Ridge: The Battle for NC 11"
See Leftwing Word Games & Religious Freedom.
Providing foot baths is harmless, but you are right to imply that were a public University to spend money to provide some facility to encourage Christian worship--particularly by a denomination closely linked to the social infrastructure of the community involved, over many generations--the ACLU would go ballistic. That is because the Christian denomination would represent an institution in support of an important aspect of the American tradition. Obviously the Islamic group does not.
William Flax
Hate America commies and hate America muzzies UNITE!
Well, some drunk (or not) Frat Guys could just piss it all the time. WHEWPS!! How so politically incorrect!
You could also say “I support and defend pedophiles but deplore pedophilia.”
This to is circumlocution. An enabler supports the act regardless of good intentions.
Also, there is a disparity in which people the ACLU chooses to support.
For example, the ACLU petitions to have Christian Bibles removed from hotels. My opinion is that it would make their head explode if Muslims started putting Korans in hotels. But maybe I overstate the obvious. The ACLU would just ignore it and not say a word.
This sort of disparity of outrage(selective outrage) is precisly why they are widely know as the Anti-Christian-Lawyer-Union
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.