Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Dinosaurs, early relatives coexisted
sfgate.com ^ | Friday, July 20, 2007 | David Perlman, Chronicle Science Editor

Posted on 07/20/2007 12:30:45 PM PDT by my_pointy_head_is_sharp

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 321-324 next last
To: Non-Sequitur

I do not know him. I am not RC.


101 posted on 07/20/2007 2:29:52 PM PDT by Resolute Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: my_pointy_head_is_sharp

So its true, Rush Limbaugh’s radio program existed at the same time as Old Media Network news at the dawn of the new media...

(/s)


102 posted on 07/20/2007 2:30:03 PM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: my_pointy_head_is_sharp

What? No Hellen Thomas pic?


103 posted on 07/20/2007 2:31:24 PM PDT by DanielLongo (Don't tread on me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GunRunner
According to them, I'm a "monkey worshiper" who kneels at the Church of Darwin because I believe that dinosaurs lived over 65 million years ago.

Pass the bananas, please.


104 posted on 07/20/2007 2:31:50 PM PDT by DallasMike
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: Resolute Conservative
I did not evolve from amoebas to amphibian to primates to me.

You can believe whatever you want to believe, but the evidence is there.

If God wants me to know what happen prior to written history as far as an exact time line goes he will let me know after the White Throne Judgment.

And that's ok, but many of us want to use our God-given intellects to examine the universe around us. After all, can you really appreciate God's creation if you can't understand its majesty? As far as I'm concerned, to look at the elegant genius of evolution is to get a glimpse of the divine. You're more than welcome to disagree - again, that's your perogative.

105 posted on 07/20/2007 2:40:15 PM PDT by Alter Kaker (Gravitation is a theory, not a fact. It should be approached with an open mind...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: mgstarr
Someone said something quite similar a few years ago: "There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, Than are dreamt of in your philosophy."

Isn't that a Danish saying? Something's rotten in the state of the educational system.

106 posted on 07/20/2007 2:42:13 PM PDT by Alter Kaker (Gravitation is a theory, not a fact. It should be approached with an open mind...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: Resolute Conservative
Via archeology, there has been no proof of several momentous occurrences in the Bible. The ones that come to mind are Moses and his follower's exodus from Egypt, the Roman taxation census, and the slaughter of innocents.

"Monkey worshiper" is one of the favorite epithets of creationists on FR for people who believe in evolution and a 4 billion year old Earth.

I do agree that atheism is a religion because. That's why I don't call myself one. I don't know either way if there is a God, but if there is, I doubt he takes an interest in my day to day life. If he is taking an interest in my life, I wish he would stop and spend more time with the poor, sick, and oppressed. If he solves those problems, then maybe he can take up an interest in the details of my everyday existence, of which most are completely inconsequential when compared to the troubles of a starving kid in India or a soldier in Iraq.

107 posted on 07/20/2007 2:43:03 PM PDT by GunRunner (Come on Fred, how long are you going to wait?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: Resolute Conservative
I have the word of the Bible which via archeology has been proven to be accurate through related finds.

You're absolutely correct. However, the Bible also says that the hills are "ancient." See here for a more detailed explanation. There is nothing in Genesis to indicate that the universe is only 6,000 to 10,000 years old. It's a man-made construct and we can be better witnesses to the world by getting rid of this medieval belief. The Bible does not contradict science. All truth is God's truth.


108 posted on 07/20/2007 2:43:16 PM PDT by DallasMike
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: Resolute Conservative
If God wants me to know what happen prior to written history as far as an exact time line goes he will let me know after the White Throne Judgment.

Exactly. The Bible that I use the most devotes a whopping 2 pages to the creation story. Not only that, the creation story is mostly about WHO created the universe, not HOW or WHEN. If God had wanted us to know more of these details, including the age of the universe, He would have included it in the Bible. It is obviously not an important issue to God, so why should it be an important issue to use?


109 posted on 07/20/2007 2:48:18 PM PDT by DallasMike
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: DallasMike

If the Biblical timeline of history is to believed (with Noah’s Ark through the line of Patriarchs and Adam’s lineage, then the earth does have to be somewhere along the lines of no more than 10,000 years old. Yet I agree with you that The Bible doesnt contradict science (afterall God created the world, including nature, and all natural laws).

The question is what consists of “science” I contend speculation does not, only provable emprical evidence, which (in my opinion does not include “macro-evolution”).

Blessings,

-JS.


110 posted on 07/20/2007 2:50:16 PM PDT by JSDude1 (Republicans if the don't beware ARE the new WHIGS! (all empty hairpieces..) :).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: Rodney King
Another bogus story designed to test our faith. The earth is only 9,000 years old.

Yikes! This is the kind of quote that liberal whack-jobs like the DUmmies like to highlight, to make the claim that conservatives (as represented by posters on this site) are a bunch of loons that do not believe in scientific evidence.

Our good creationist brethren really need to stop taking the current English translation of the Bible so literally, particularly the very oldest parts in the beginning of Genesis. Keep in mind that your English bible has undergone many language translations and rewrites over millenia.

Take particular note of the potential Hebrew definitions of a "day" as noted in this link . Per original semantics prior to English translations, a "day" can also be interpreted as a "time period", meaning Earth's creation over a period of "7 days" could very well translate into any period you like (e.g. billions of years). This supports both scientific evidence of God's work, while NOT contradicting what is written in the Bible.

Remember, God created EVERYTHING, including time & space. Also keep in mind the theory of relativity (invented by God BTW :), and its meaning relative to time. What time frame, relative to Earth, is Heaven in? Given that God created the entire universe, it seems pretty arrogant to think He measures time by a "day" as defined by the orbital rotation of our single planet.

111 posted on 07/20/2007 2:51:50 PM PDT by MCH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: my_pointy_head_is_sharp

YEC INTREP


112 posted on 07/20/2007 2:54:50 PM PDT by LiteKeeper (Beware the secularization of America; the Islamization of Eurabia)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DallasMike
If God had wanted us to know more of these details, including the age of the universe, He would have included it in the Bible. It is obviously not an important issue to God, so why should it be an important issue to us?

While we're at it...

There is no Biblical authority for the date of Jesus' birth. I submit that his birth is relatively unimportant, as all me are born. What is important isn't that he died on the cross either (stay with me!), as all men die.

What he did is come back of his own accord, THAT is unique. THAT is THE defining moment of Christianity. Even his Disciples doubted until they knew he had risen.

And that is also an event that the Bible precisely dates!

There's where our calendar should start, with the day of resurrection, not with something so common as a birth, but with a singular rebirth.

Extra bonus points:

That means this isn't the 2007th Year of Redemption.

And that means we haven't yet reached the True Millennium, either...

113 posted on 07/20/2007 3:01:44 PM PDT by null and void (We are a Nation of Laws... IGNORED Laws...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: JSDude1
If the Biblical timeline of history is to believed (with Noah’s Ark through the line of Patriarchs and Adam’s lineage, then the earth does have to be somewhere along the lines of no more than 10,000 years old. Yet I agree with you that The Bible doesnt contradict science (afterall God created the world, including nature, and all natural laws).

I believe in the Biblical timeline of history. However, I do not believe in the interpretation by some that the Bible says that the universe is something less than 10,000 years. Hebrew allows for the meaning of a "day" to be anywhere from just the daylight hours to an unspecified amount of time (see here for more involved explanations. Once one recognizes that fact, any supposed conflict with science goes away. Think of it as you would the English word "time." Time can mean exactly 3 PM, or the time of the Roman Empire, or every moment that has happened since creation. Same word, different meanings, depending upon the context.


114 posted on 07/20/2007 3:18:30 PM PDT by DallasMike
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: DallasMike

Back in my day a day was 24 hours...


115 posted on 07/20/2007 3:23:58 PM PDT by null and void (We are a Nation of Laws... IGNORED Laws...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: Calpernia



116 posted on 07/20/2007 3:26:54 PM PDT by wally_bert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: null and void
Back in my day a day was 24 hours...

That's the funniest post I've seen in weeks. Thanks!

117 posted on 07/20/2007 3:31:34 PM PDT by DallasMike
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: ejonesie22

re post 59: darn right!! God can and will do whatever God pleases, whether or not we agree with it, or like it, or want it...


118 posted on 07/20/2007 3:36:59 PM PDT by toomuchcoffee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: DallasMike

Thank you. Yours was the best set-up I’ve seen in months!


119 posted on 07/20/2007 3:38:44 PM PDT by null and void (We are a Nation of Laws... IGNORED Laws...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: Greg F
It looks like his arms are hanging limp at his side.

And his legs have nothing to do.

120 posted on 07/20/2007 3:38:48 PM PDT by Tribune7 (Live Earth: Pretend to Care)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 321-324 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson